UPDATE OF DUTCH MULTICENTER DOSE-ESCALATION TRIAL OF RADIOTHERAPY FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER

被引:324
作者
Al-Mamgani, Abrahim [1 ]
van Putten, Wim L. J.
Heemsbergen, Wilma D. [2 ]
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
Slot, Annerie [3 ]
Dielwart, Michel F. H. [4 ]
Incrocci, Luca
Lebesque, Joos V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Erasmus Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, NL-3075 EA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Radiotherapeut Inst Friesland, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
[4] Zeeuws Radiotherapeut Inst, Vlissingen, Netherlands
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2008年 / 72卷 / 04期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Randomized trial; External beam radiotherapy; Conformal; Dose escalation; Rectal toxicity;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.073
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To update the analysis of the Dutch dose-escalation trial of radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: A total of 669 patients with localized prostate cancer were randomly assigned to receive 68 or 78 Gy. The patients were stratified by age, institution, use of neoadjuvant or adjuvant hormonal therapy, and treatment group. The primary endpoint was freedom from failure (FFF), with failure defined as clinical or biochemical failure. Two definitions of biochemical failure were used: the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition (three consecutive increases in prostate-specific antigen level) and the Phoenix definition (nadir plus 2 mu g/L). The secondary endpoints were freedom from clinical failure, overall survival, and genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity. Results: After a median follow-up of 70 months, the FFF using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition was significantly better in the 78-Gy arm than in the 68-Gy arm (7-year FFF rate, 54% vs. 47%, respectively; p = 0.04). The FFF using the Phoenix definition was also significantly better in the 78-Gy arm than in the 68-Gy arm (7-year FFF rate, 56 % vs. 45 %, respectively; p = 0.03). However, no differences in freedom from clinical failure or overall survival were observed. The incidence of late Grade 2 or greater genitourinary toxicity was similar in both arms (40 % and 41 % at 7 years; p = 0.6). However, the cumulative incidence of late Grade 2 or greater gastrointestinal toxicity was increased in the 78-Gy arm compared with the 68-Gy arm (35 % vs. 25 % at 7 years; p = 0.04). Conclusion: The results of our study have shown a statistically significant improvement in FFF in prostate cancer patients treated with 78 Gy but with a greater rate of late gastrointestinal toxicity. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:980 / 988
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Statistical considerations when assessing outcomes following treatment for prostate cancer [J].
Albertsen, PC ;
Hanley, JA ;
Murphy-Setzko, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (02) :439-444
[2]   Reduction of rectal dose by integration of the boost in the large-field treatment plan for prostate irradiation [J].
Bos, LJ ;
Damen, EMF ;
de Boer, RW ;
Mijnheer, BJ ;
McShan, DL ;
Fraass, BA ;
Kessler, ML ;
Lebesque, JV .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (01) :254-265
[3]   Defining biochemical failure after radiotherapy with and without androgen deprivation for prostate cancer [J].
Buyyounouski, MK ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Eisenberg, DF ;
Horwitz, EM ;
Feigenberg, SJ ;
Uzzo, RG ;
Pollack, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (05) :1455-1462
[4]   A comparison of the single and double factor high-risk models for risk assignment of prostate cancer treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy [J].
Chism, DB ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Horwitz, EM ;
Feigenberg, SJ ;
Pollack, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (02) :380-385
[5]  
Cox JD, 1997, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V37, P1035
[6]   Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial [J].
Dearnaley, David P. ;
Sydes, Matthew R. ;
Graham, John D. ;
Aird, Edwin G. ;
Bottomley, David ;
Cowan, Richard A. ;
Huddart, Robert A. ;
Jose, Chakiath C. ;
Matthews, John H. L. ;
Millar, Jeremy ;
Moore, A. Rollo ;
Morgan, Rachel C. ;
Russell, J. Martin ;
Scrase, Christopher D. ;
Stephens, Richard J. ;
Syndikus, Isabel ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. B. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (06) :475-487
[7]   Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects [J].
Dearnaley, DP ;
Hall, E ;
Lawrence, D ;
Huddart, RA ;
Eeles, R ;
Nutting, CM ;
Gadd, J ;
Warrington, A ;
Bidmead, M ;
Horwich, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 92 (03) :488-498
[8]   Late normal tissue sequelae in the second decade after high dose radiation therapy with combined photons and conformal protons for locally advanced prostate cancer [J].
Gardner, BG ;
Zietman, AL ;
Shipley, WU ;
Skowronski, UE ;
McManus, P .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (01) :123-126
[9]   A critical analysis of the interpretation of biochemical failure in surgically treated patients using the american society for therapeutic radiation and oncology criteria [J].
Gretzer, MB ;
Trock, BJ ;
Han, M ;
Walsh, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (04) :1419-1422
[10]   OPTIMIZING THE RADIATION TREATMENT AND OUTCOME OF PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
HANKS, GE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1985, 11 (07) :1235-1245