Effect of canopy management on growth and yield of mango cv. Amrapali planted at close spacing

被引:0
|
作者
Das, Bikash [1 ]
Jana, B. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Res Complex Eastern Reg, Res Ctr, Ranchi 834010, Jharkhand, India
来源
关键词
Mango; rejuvenation; canopy architecture; pruning; OLD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Investigations were undertaken at ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Research Centre, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India (ICAR RCER, RC, R) to standardize canopy architecture of rejuvenated mango plants of cv. Amrapali planted at a closer spacing. Twenty four years old mango trees cv. Amrapali planted at a spacing of 5.0 m x 5.0 m were topped at three different heights: 1.0 m (R1), 1.5 m (R2) and 2.0 m (R3) above ground during December, 2005. Treatments on length of primary shoot [60 cm (P1), 120 cm (P2), no control on length of primary shoot (P3)] and length of secondary shoots [60 cm (S1) and no control on length of secondary shoot (S2)] were imposed after one year of rejuvenation pruning in 18 different combinations. The earliest bud sprouting occurred in R3 and longer in R1 trees. There were significant differences among treatments for tree height during both the years of study and canopy spread and shoot girth after one year of rejuvenation pruning. The treatment R1 resulted in lower plant height as compared to R2 and R3 trees. With respect to girth of primary shoots, R1 resulted in lower values as compared to other treatments after one year of rejuvenation pruning. However, the differences among the values of girth of primary shoot during 2010 were non-significant. Initiation of fruiting began after third year of rejuvenation pruning. Yield greater than 60 kg/tree were recorded in R2 and R3. Pruning at 1.0 m (R1), 60 cm length of primary shoot (P1), and no control on length of secondary shoots (S2) was found to be the best management practice for rejuvenation of unproductive mango orchards of cv. Amrapali planted at close spacing.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 319
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effectiveness of different spray schedules against mango hopper and yield of mango cv. Himsagar
    Samanta, Arunava
    Dhote, V. W.
    Patra, Sandip
    Biswas, Milan
    RESEARCH ON CROPS, 2013, 14 (03) : 860 - 863
  • [22] Effect of cincturing and chemical treatments on growth, flowering and yield of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Kensington Pride
    Leonardi, J
    Blaikie, SJ
    Muller, WJ
    Scott, NS
    Chacko, EK
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1999, 39 (06): : 761 - 770
  • [23] Effect of organic mulching on growth and yield of raspberry cv. heritage
    Pedreros, A.
    Gonzalez, M. L.
    Manosalva, V.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IXTH INTERNATIONAL RUBUS AND RIBES SYMPOSIUM, 2008, (777): : 473 - 475
  • [24] Effect of bud load and canopy management on growth and yield components of grape cv. 'Cardinal' under mild climatic conditions of Agadir area of Morocco
    Benismail, M. C.
    Bennaouar, M.
    Elmribti, A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ADVANCES IN GRAPEVINE AND WINE RESEARCH, 2007, (754): : 197 - 203
  • [25] Effect of Fertigation on Growth and Yield of Papaya cv. Red Lady
    Sadarunnisa, S.
    Madhumathi, C.
    Babu, K. Hari
    Sreenivasulu, B.
    Krishna, M. Rama
    II INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PAPAYA, 2010, 851
  • [26] Young Flush Thinning in Mango (cv. Cogshall) Controls Canopy Density and Production
    Jannoyer, M.
    Lauri, P. -E.
    VIII INTERNATIONAL MANGO SYMPOSIUM, 2009, 820 : 395 - 402
  • [27] Biostimulants on Fruit Yield and Quality of Mango cv. Kent Grown in Semiarid
    Lobo, Jackson Teixeira
    Melo De Sousa, Karla Dos Santos
    De Paiva Neto, Vespasiano Borges
    Pereira, Renan Nunes
    Silva, Luan Dos Santos
    Lucena Cavalante, Italo Herbert
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN POMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 73 (03) : 152 - 160
  • [28] PHYSIOLOGICAL DESORDERS AND FRUIT YIELD OF MANGO CV. PALMER ASSOCIATED TO BORON NUTRITION: BORON FERTILIZING MANAGEMENT
    Silva Barbosa, Luirick Felix
    Lucena Cavalcante, Italo Herbert
    Nascimento Lima, Augusto Miguel
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE FRUTICULTURA, 2016, 38 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [29] Effect of Pre-harvest Nutrients Application and Bagging on Quality and Shelf Life of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Fruits cv. Amrapali
    Jakhar, M. S.
    Pathak, S.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 18 (03): : 717 - 729
  • [30] Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield attributes and yield of field pea (Pisum sativum L) cv. Rachna
    Qureshi, Fozia
    Bashir, Uzma
    Ali, Tahir
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2015, 38 (05) : 701 - 703