Efficacy and safety of tanezumab versus naproxen in the treatment of chronic low back pain

被引:123
|
作者
Kivitz, Alan J. [1 ]
Gimbel, Joseph S. [2 ]
Bramson, Candace [3 ]
Nemeth, Mary Anne [3 ]
Keller, David S. [3 ]
Brown, Mark T. [3 ]
West, Christine R. [3 ]
Verburg, Kenneth M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Altoona Ctr Clin Res, Duncansville, PA 16635 USA
[2] Arizona Res Ctr, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT 06340 USA
关键词
Chronic low back pain; Efficacy; Nerve growth factor; Safety; Tanezumab; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINE; NERVE GROWTH-FACTOR; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALS; DOUBLE-BLIND; SOCIETY/AMERICAN COLLEGE; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; OUTCOME MEASURES; RESPONDER INDEX; PRIMARY-CARE; KNEE PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.pain.2013.03.006
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Tanezumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits nerve growth factor as a treatment for chronic pain. This phase IIB study investigated the efficacy and safety of tanezumab for chronic low back pain vs placebo and naproxen. Patients (N = 1347) received intravenous tanezumab (5, 10, or 20 mg every 8 weeks), naproxen (500 mg twice daily), or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was mean change in daily average low back pain intensity (LBPI) from baseline to week 16. Secondary end points included mean change from baseline to week 16 in the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of low back pain. Tanezumab 10 and 20 mg had similar efficacy profiles and significantly improved LBPI, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, and PGA scores vs both placebo and naproxen (P <= .05). Tanezumab 5 mg provided improvement of PGA scores vs placebo (P <= .05), and naproxen resulted in significant improvement of LBPI vs placebo (P <= .05). Adverse event incidence was comparable across tanezumab doses but higher than with placebo or naproxen. Arthralgia, pain in extremity, headache, and paresthesia were the most commonly reported adverse events by tanezumab-treated patients. The most frequently reported adverse events resulting in discontinuation of tanezumab treatment were arthralgia and paresthesia; the highest frequency was observed with tanezumab 20 mg (both 1.4%). Serious adverse event incidence was similar across treatments. In conclusion, tanezumab provided significantly greater improvement in pain, function, and global scores vs placebo and naproxen in patients with chronic low back pain. (C) 2013 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1021
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and safety of duloxetine in osteoarthritis or chronic low back pain: a Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Weng, C.
    Xu, J.
    Wang, Q.
    Lu, W.
    Liu, Z.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2020, 28 (06) : 721 - 734
  • [22] Preliminary Assessment of Safety and Efficacy in Proof-of-Concept, Randomized Clinical Trial of Tanezumab for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome
    Nickel, J. Curtis
    Atkinson, Gary
    Krieger, John N.
    Mills, Ian W.
    Pontari, Michel
    Shoskes, Daniel A.
    Crook, Tim J.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (05) : 1105 - 1110
  • [23] Design of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of tanezumab for treatment of schwannomatosis-related pain
    Da, Jennifer L. W.
    Merker, Vanessa L.
    Jordan, Justin T.
    Ly, K. Ina
    Muzikansky, Alona
    Parsons, Michael
    Wolters, Pamela L.
    Xu, Lei
    Styren, Scot
    Brown, Mark T.
    Plotkin, Scott R.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 121
  • [24] Nerve safety of tanezumab, a nerve growth factor inhibitor for pain treatment
    Brown, Mark T.
    Herrmann, David N.
    Goldstein, Mark
    Burr, Aimee M.
    Smith, Michael D.
    West, Christine R.
    Verburg, Kenneth M.
    Dyck, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 345 (1-2) : 139 - 147
  • [25] Eperisone versus tizanidine for treatment of chronic low back pain
    Rossi, M.
    Ianigro, G.
    Liberatoscioli, G.
    Di Castelnuovo, A.
    Grimani, V.
    Garofano, A.
    Camposarcone, N.
    Nardi, L. F.
    MINERVA MEDICA, 2012, 103 (03) : 143 - 149
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of fasinumab in patients with chronic low back pain: a phase II/III randomised clinical trial
    Dakin, Paula
    Kivitz, Alan J.
    Gimbel, Joseph S.
    Skrepnik, Nebojsa
    DiMartino, Stephen J.
    Emeremni, Chetachi A.
    Gao, Haitao
    Stahl, Neil
    Weinreich, David M.
    Yancopoulos, George D.
    Geba, Gregory P.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2021, 80 (04) : 509 - 517
  • [27] Efficacy and Safety of Tapentadol Prolonged Release for Chronic Osteoarthritis Pain and Low Back Pain
    Lange, Bernd
    Kuperwasser, Brigitte
    Okamoto, Akiko
    Steup, Achim
    Haeufel, Thomas
    Ashworth, Judy
    Etropolski, Mila
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2010, 27 (06) : 381 - 399
  • [28] The neuropathic component in chronic low back pain
    Foerster, M.
    Mahn, F.
    Baron, R.
    NERVENHEILKUNDE, 2012, 31 (03) : 147 - 153
  • [29] Treatment strategy for chronic low back pain
    Rozenberg, Sylvie
    Foltz, Violaine
    Fautrel, Bruno
    JOINT BONE SPINE, 2012, 79 (06) : 555 - 559
  • [30] A comprehensive review of clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of drugs for the treatment of low back pain
    Schnitzer, TJ
    Ferraro, A
    Hunsche, E
    Kong, SX
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2004, 28 (01) : 72 - 95