Efficacy and safety of tanezumab versus naproxen in the treatment of chronic low back pain

被引:123
|
作者
Kivitz, Alan J. [1 ]
Gimbel, Joseph S. [2 ]
Bramson, Candace [3 ]
Nemeth, Mary Anne [3 ]
Keller, David S. [3 ]
Brown, Mark T. [3 ]
West, Christine R. [3 ]
Verburg, Kenneth M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Altoona Ctr Clin Res, Duncansville, PA 16635 USA
[2] Arizona Res Ctr, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT 06340 USA
关键词
Chronic low back pain; Efficacy; Nerve growth factor; Safety; Tanezumab; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINE; NERVE GROWTH-FACTOR; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALS; DOUBLE-BLIND; SOCIETY/AMERICAN COLLEGE; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; OUTCOME MEASURES; RESPONDER INDEX; PRIMARY-CARE; KNEE PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.pain.2013.03.006
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Tanezumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits nerve growth factor as a treatment for chronic pain. This phase IIB study investigated the efficacy and safety of tanezumab for chronic low back pain vs placebo and naproxen. Patients (N = 1347) received intravenous tanezumab (5, 10, or 20 mg every 8 weeks), naproxen (500 mg twice daily), or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was mean change in daily average low back pain intensity (LBPI) from baseline to week 16. Secondary end points included mean change from baseline to week 16 in the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of low back pain. Tanezumab 10 and 20 mg had similar efficacy profiles and significantly improved LBPI, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, and PGA scores vs both placebo and naproxen (P <= .05). Tanezumab 5 mg provided improvement of PGA scores vs placebo (P <= .05), and naproxen resulted in significant improvement of LBPI vs placebo (P <= .05). Adverse event incidence was comparable across tanezumab doses but higher than with placebo or naproxen. Arthralgia, pain in extremity, headache, and paresthesia were the most commonly reported adverse events by tanezumab-treated patients. The most frequently reported adverse events resulting in discontinuation of tanezumab treatment were arthralgia and paresthesia; the highest frequency was observed with tanezumab 20 mg (both 1.4%). Serious adverse event incidence was similar across treatments. In conclusion, tanezumab provided significantly greater improvement in pain, function, and global scores vs placebo and naproxen in patients with chronic low back pain. (C) 2013 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1021
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of tanezumab in the treatment of chronic low back pain
    Katz, Nathaniel
    Borenstein, David G.
    Birbara, Charles
    Bramson, Candace
    Nemeth, Mary Anne
    Smith, Mike D.
    Brown, Mark T.
    PAIN, 2011, 152 (10) : 2248 - 2258
  • [2] Long-term safety and effectiveness of tanezumab as treatment for chronic low back pain
    Gimbel, Joseph S.
    Kivitz, Alan J.
    Bramson, Candace
    Nemeth, Mary Anne
    Keller, David S.
    Brown, Mark T.
    West, Christine R.
    Verburg, Kenneth M.
    PAIN, 2014, 155 (09) : 1793 - 1801
  • [3] Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Tanezumab for the Symptomatic Treatment of Osteoarthritis: 2 Randomized Controlled Trials versus Naproxen
    Ekman, Evan F.
    Gimbel, Joseph S.
    Bello, Alfonso E.
    Smith, Michael D.
    Keller, David S.
    Annis, Karen M.
    Brown, Mark T.
    West, Christine R.
    Verburg, M.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 41 (11) : 2249 - 2259
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of tanezumab in the treatment of pain from bone metastases
    Sopata, Maciej
    Katz, Nathaniel
    Carey, William
    Smith, Michael D.
    Keller, David
    Verburg, Kenneth M.
    West, Christine R.
    Wolfram, Gernot
    Brown, Mark T.
    PAIN, 2015, 156 (09) : 1703 - 1713
  • [5] Population pharmacokinetics of tanezumab following intravenous or subcutaneous administration to patients with osteoarthritis or chronic low back pain
    Shoji, Satoshi
    Suzuki, Akiyuki
    Gaitonde, Puneet
    Cai, Chun-Hua
    Marshall, Scott
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 88 (07) : 3321 - 3334
  • [6] Different Dosage Regimens of Tanezumab for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lian, Jinrong
    Wang, Jiahe
    Li, Xiang
    Yang, Siyuan
    Li, Hang
    Zhong, Yi
    Gao, Heng
    Chen, Gang
    CLINICAL NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 46 (01) : 6 - 16
  • [7] Tanezumab: a selective humanized mAb for chronic lower back pain
    Webb, Michael P.
    Helander, Erik M.
    Menard, Bethany L.
    Urman, Richard D.
    Kaye, Alan D.
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2018, 14 : 361 - 367
  • [8] Tanezumab for chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, phase 3 study of efficacy and safety
    Markman, John D.
    Bolash, Robert B.
    McAlindon, Timothy E.
    Kivitz, Alan J.
    Pombo-Suarez, Manuel
    Ohtori, Seiji
    Roemer, Frank W.
    Li, David J.
    Viktrup, Lars
    Bramson, Candace
    West, Christine R.
    Verburg, Kenneth M.
    PAIN, 2020, 161 (09) : 2068 - 2078
  • [9] The Efficacy of Nerve Growth Factor Antibody for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis Pain and Chronic Low-Back Pain: A Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Si
    Huang, Yu
    Ye, Ziqi
    Li, Lu
    Zhang, Yu
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [10] First-in-human randomized clinical trials of the safety and efficacy of tanezumab for treatment of chronic knee osteoarthritis pain or acute bunionectomy pain
    Walicke, Patricia A.
    Hefti, Franz
    Bales, Roxanne
    Lu, Shiao-Ping
    Ruckle, Jon L.
    Brown, Mark T.
    West, Christine R.
    Shelton, David L.
    PAIN REPORTS, 2018, 3 (03)