Non-platinum doublets were as effective as platinum-based doublets for chemotherapy-na⟨ve advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the era of third-generation agents

被引:7
|
作者
Jiang, Jingwei [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Xiaohua [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Xinli [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Ruofan [1 ,2 ]
Chu, Zhaohui [1 ,2 ]
Zhan, Qiong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Dept Oncol, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carcinoma; Non-small-cell lung; Chemotherapy; Platinum; Third-generation agents; Meta-analysis; RANDOMIZED PHASE-II; PACLITAXEL PLUS CARBOPLATIN; GEMCITABINE-DOCETAXEL; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; VINORELBINE; CHEMOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN; TRIAL; COMBINATION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00432-012-1294-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim was to compare the efficacy between doublets of third-generation agents (non-platinum) and doublets of platinum plus a third-generation agent (platinum-based) for chemotherapy-na < ve advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a literature-based meta-analysis to compare the efficacy between doublets of third-generation agents and doublets of platinum plus a third-generation agent for chemotherapy-na < ve advanced NSCLC. The primary end point was overall survival, and the secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate. Subgroup analyses were also conducted by different non-platinum doublet regimens or different platinum-based doublets. A descriptive review for toxicity was performed. Sixteen randomized controlled trials were identified ultimately. Results demonstrated that the efficacy of non-platinum doublets was comparable with platinum-based doublets according to the overall survival (HR = 1.03, 95 % CI = 0.98-1.08, p = 0.29). Subgroup analyses by different non-platinum doublets also showed the efficacy of all the third-generation doublets, such as vinorelbine plus gemcitabine, vinorelbine plus paclitaxel, gemcitabine plus paclitaxel, and gemcitabine plus docetaxel, was comparable with platinum-based doublets (HR = 1.00, 95 % CI = 0.78-1.27, p = 0.98; HR = 0.97, 95 % CI = 0.80-1.18, p = 0.79; HR = 1.05, 95 % CI = 0.99-1.12, p = 0.11; HR = 1.01, 95 % CI = 0.92-1.10, p = 0.87; respectively). Subgroup analyses by different platinum-based doublets indicated that the efficacy of the third-generation doublets were equal to both cisplatin-based doublets and carboplatin-based doublets (HR = 1.08, 95 % CI = 1.00-1.17, p = 0.05; HR = 1.00, 95 % CI = 0.94-1.05, p = 0.94; respectively). The secondary end points indicated that platinum-based doublets might have an advantage in PFS but not in response rate (HR = 1.06, 95 % CI = 1.01-1.12, p = 0.03; RR = 0.99, 95 % CI = 0.90-1.08, p = 0.81; respectively). Non-platinum doublets were as effective as platinum-based doublets with different toxicity profile for chemotherapy-na < ve advanced NSCLC in the era of third-generation agents.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 38
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Non-platinum doublets were as effective as platinum-based doublets for chemotherapy-naïve advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the era of third-generation agents
    Jingwei Jiang
    Xiaohua Liang
    Xinli Zhou
    Ruofan Huang
    Zhaohui Chu
    Qiong Zhan
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2013, 139 : 25 - 38
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of non-platinum based doublets chemotherapy compared with platinum-based doublets chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a meta-analysis
    Huang, Jing-Tao
    Zhang, Zhong-Wei
    Zhang, Yong-Min
    Yan, Wen-Qiang
    Li, Zhi-Gang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (08): : 15262 - 15273
  • [3] Phase II study of erlotinib for chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who are ineligible for platinum doublets
    Dae Ho Lee
    Sang-We Kim
    Cheolwon Suh
    Yun Hee Han
    Jung-Shin Lee
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2011, 67 : 35 - 39
  • [4] Phase III randomized trial comparing three platinum-based doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Scagliotti, GV
    De Marinis, F
    Rinaldi, M
    Crinò, L
    Gridelli, C
    Ricci, S
    Matano, E
    Boni, C
    Marangolo, M
    Failla, G
    Altavilla, G
    Adamo, V
    Ceribelli, A
    Clerici, M
    Di Costanzo, F
    Frontini, L
    Tonato, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (21) : 4285 - 4291
  • [5] Platinum-based and non-platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial
    Georgoulias, V
    Papadakis, E
    Alexopoulos, A
    Tsiafaki, X
    Rapti, A
    Veslemes, M
    Palamidas, P
    Vlachonikolis, I
    LANCET, 2001, 357 (9267): : 1478 - 1484
  • [6] Comparison Of Bevacizumab Versus Pemetrexed In Combination With Platinum-based Doublets In First-line Treatment Of Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
    Pereira, A. A. R.
    Lessa, R. C.
    Martins, S. J.
    Pinto, F. A. I.
    Cruz, M. R. S.
    Pereira, J. R.
    Gagliato, D. M.
    Rodrigues, N. A. F.
    Santos, E. S.
    Lima, V. C. C.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7 (09) : S247 - S247
  • [7] Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer
    Amarasena, Isuru U.
    Walters, Julia A. E.
    Wood-Baker, Richard
    Fong, Kwun
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (04):
  • [8] Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer
    Amarasena, Isuru U.
    Chatterjee, Saion
    Walters, Julia A. E.
    Wood-Baker, Richard
    Fong, Kwun M.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (08):
  • [9] Platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: optimal number of treatment cycles
    Rossi, Antonio
    Di Maio, Massimo
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2016, 16 (06) : 653 - 660
  • [10] Platinum-based versus non-platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of the published literature
    D'Addario, G
    Pintilie, M
    Leighl, NB
    Feld, R
    Cerny, T
    Shepherd, FA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (13) : 2926 - 2936