'Too interconnected to fail' financial network of US CDS market: Topological fragility and systemic risk

被引:178
|
作者
Markose, Sheri [1 ]
Giansante, Simone [2 ]
Shaghaghi, Ali Rais [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Dept Econ, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[2] Univ Bath, Sch Management, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[3] Univ Essex, CCFEA, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
Credit default swaps; Financial networks; Eigenvector centrality; Financial contagion; Systemic risk; Super-spreader tax; CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS; EXPOSURES; CONTAGION; LIQUIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2012.05.016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A small segment of credit default swaps (CDS) on residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) stand implicated in the 2007 financial crisis. The dominance of a few big players in the chains of insurance and reinsurance for CDS credit risk mitigation for banks' assets has led to the idea of too interconnected to fail (TITF) resulting, as in the case of AIG, of a tax payer bailout. We provide an empirical reconstruction of the US CDS network based on the FDIC Call Reports for off balance sheet bank data for the 4th quarter in 2007 and 2008. The propagation of financial contagion in networks with dense clustering which reflects high concentration or localization of exposures between few participants will be identified as one that is TITF. Those that dominate in terms of network centrality and connectivity are called 'super-spreaders'. Management of systemic risk from bank failure in uncorrelated random networks is different to those with clustering. As systemic risk of highly connected financial firms in the CDS (or any other) financial markets is not priced into their holding of capital and collateral, we design a super-spreader tax based on eigenvector centrality of the banks which can mitigate potential socialized losses. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 646
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Financial turbulence, systemic risk and the predictability of stock market volatility
    Salisu, Afees A.
    Demirer, Riza
    Gupta, Rangan
    GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2022, 52
  • [42] Investor ambiguity, systemic banking risk and economic activity: The case of too-big-to-fail
    Driouchi, Tarik
    So, Raymond H. Y.
    Trigeorgis, Lenos
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 62
  • [43] Common asset holdings and systemic risk of financial network
    Zhao, Zhigang
    Zhang, Wei
    Shi, Shanchong
    FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 17 : 1010 - 1014
  • [44] Are "too big to fail" banks just different in size? - A study on systemic risk and stand-alone risk
    Li, Zongyuan
    Lai, Rose Neng
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 93
  • [45] Systemic risk and the financial network system: an experimental investigation
    Yudistira Permana
    Saiqa Akbar
    Anisa Nurpita
    Eurasian Economic Review, 2022, 12 : 631 - 651
  • [46] Systemic risk and the financial network system: an experimental investigation
    Permana, Yudistira
    Akbar, Saiqa
    Nurpita, Anisa
    EURASIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 12 (04) : 631 - 651
  • [47] Imported financial risk in global stock markets: Evidence from the interconnected network
    Ouyang, Zisheng
    Zhou, Xuewei
    Lu, Min
    Liu, Ke
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2024, 69
  • [48] Financial Network Connectedness and Systemic Risk During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    So, Mike K. P.
    Chan, Lupe S. H.
    Chu, Amanda M. Y.
    ASIA-PACIFIC FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2021, 28 (04) : 649 - 665
  • [50] The stock market reaction to the public announcement of a supranational list of too-big-to-fail banks during the financial crisis
    Abreu, Jose Filipe
    Gulamhussen, Mohamed Azzim
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2013, 25 : 49 - 72