The role of the comprehensive complication index for the prediction of survival after liver transplantation

被引:13
|
作者
Lai, Quirino [1 ]
Melandro, Fabio [1 ]
Nowak, Greg [2 ]
Nicolini, Daniele [3 ]
Iesari, Samuele [4 ,5 ]
Fasolo, Elisa [6 ]
Mennini, Gianluca [1 ]
Romano, Antonio [2 ]
Mocchegiani, Federico [3 ]
Ackenine, Kevin [4 ]
Polacco, Marina [6 ]
Marinelli, Laura [3 ]
Ciccarelli, Olga [4 ]
Zanus, Giacomo [6 ]
Vivarelli, Marco [3 ]
Cillo, Umberto [6 ]
Rossi, Massimo [1 ]
Ericzon, Bo-Goran [2 ]
Lerut, Jan [4 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Gen Surg & Organ Transplantat Unit, Dept Surg, Umberto I Polyclin Rome, Viale Policlin 155, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp Huddinge, Div Transplantat Surg, Solna, Sweden
[3] Azienda Osped Univ Osped Riuniti, Unit Hepatobiliary Surg & Transplantat, Polytech Univ Marche, Ancona, Italy
[4] Catholic Univ Louvain, Starzl Unit Abdominal Transplantat, Pole Chirurg Expt & Transplantat, Inst Rech Expt & Clin, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Univ Aquila, Dept Biotechnol & Appl Clin Sci, Laquila, Italy
[6] Univ Padua, Dept Surg Oncol & Gastroenterol, Padua, Italy
关键词
MELD; Retransplantation; Graft survival; Survival prediction; Allograft dysfunction; EARLY ALLOGRAFT DYSFUNCTION; BILIARY COMPLICATIONS; DEFINING BENCHMARKS; HEPATIC-ARTERY; MELD SCORE; MODEL; ALLOCATION; OUTCOMES; RECIPIENTS; DEATH;
D O I
10.1007/s13304-020-00878-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
In the last years, several scoring systems based on pre- and post-transplant parameters have been developed to predict early post-LT graft function. However, some of them showed poor diagnostic abilities. This study aims to evaluate the role of the comprehensive complication index (CCI) as a useful scoring system for accurately predicting 90-day and 1-year graft loss after liver transplantation. A training set (n = 1262) and a validation set (n = 520) were obtained. The study was registered at(ID: NCT03723317). CCI exhibited the best diagnostic performance for 90 days in the training (AUC = 0.94;p < 0.001) and Validation Sets (AUC = 0.77;p < 0.001) when compared to the BAR, D-MELD, MELD, and EAD scores. The cut-off value of 47.3 (third quartile) showed a diagnostic odds ratio of 48.3 and 7.0 in the two sets, respectively. As for 1-year graft loss, CCI showed good performances in the training (AUC = 0.88;p < 0.001) and validation sets (AUC = 0.75;p < 0.001). The threshold of 47.3 showed a diagnostic odds ratio of 21.0 and 5.4 in the two sets, respectively. All the other tested scores always showed AUCs < 0.70 in both the sets. CCI showed a good stratification ability in terms of graft loss rates in both the sets (log-rankp < 0.001). In the patients exceeding the CCI ninth decile, 1-year graft survival rates were only 0.7% and 23.1% in training and validation sets, respectively. CCI shows a very good diagnostic power for 90-day and 1-year graft loss in different sets of patients, indicating better accuracy with respect to other pre- and post-LT scores. Clinical Trial Notification: NCT03723317.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 221
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-term survival and predictors of relapse and survival after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease
    Lindenger, Christine
    Castedal, Maria
    Schult, Andreas
    Aberg, Fredrik
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 53 (12) : 1553 - 1561
  • [32] Poor Graft and Patient Survival After Liver Transplantation in Sarcoidosis
    Thuluvath, Avesh J.
    Savva, Yulia
    Chen, Po-Hung
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 54 (10) : 884 - 890
  • [33] Survival Outcomes Following Pediatric Liver Transplantation (Pedi-SOFT) Score: A Novel Predictive Index
    Rana, A.
    Pallister, Z. S.
    Guiteau, J. J.
    Cotton, R. T.
    Halazun, K.
    Nalty, C. C.
    Khaderi, S. A.
    O'Mahony, C. A.
    Goss, J. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 15 (07) : 1855 - 1863
  • [34] The Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index in Liver Transplantation: ET-DRI
    Braat, A. E.
    Blok, J. J.
    Putter, H.
    Adam, R.
    Burroughs, A. K.
    Rahmel, A. O.
    Porte, R. J.
    Rogiers, X.
    Ringers, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 (10) : 2789 - 2796
  • [35] Sarcopenia as prognostic factor for survival after orthotopic liver transplantation
    Dos Santos, Daniel Pinto
    Kloeckner, Roman
    Koch, Sandra
    Hoppe-Lotichius, Maria
    Zoeller, Daniela
    Toenges, Gerrit
    Kremer, Wolfgang Maximilian
    Zimmermann, Tim
    Mittler, Jens
    Lang, Hauke
    Dueber, Christoph
    Galle, Peter Robert
    Weinmann, Arndt
    Sprinzl, Martin Franz
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 32 (05) : 626 - 634
  • [36] Prediction of Survival After Liver Transplantation for Chronic Severe Hepatitis B Based on Preoperative Prognostic Scores: A Single Center's Experience in China
    Xiao, Liang
    Fu, Zhi-Ren
    Ding, Guo-Shan
    Fu, Hong
    Ni, Zhi-Jia
    Wang, Zheng-Xin
    Shi, Xiao-Min
    Guo, Wen-Yuan
    Ma, Jun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 33 (11) : 2420 - 2426
  • [37] Outcomes After Liver Transplantation in Patients Achieving a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score of 40 or Higher
    Alexopoulos, Sophoclis
    Matsuoka, Lea
    Cho, Yong
    Thomas, Elizabeth
    Sheikh, Mohd
    Stapfer, Maria
    Dhanireddy, Kiran
    Sher, Linda
    Selby, Rick
    Genyk, Yuri
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 95 (03) : 507 - 512
  • [38] Impact of the center on graft failure after liver transplantation
    Asrani, Sumeet K.
    Kim, W. Ray
    Edwards, Erick B.
    Larson, Joseph J.
    Thabut, Gabriel
    Kremers, Walter K.
    Therneau, Terry M.
    Heimbach, Julie
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 19 (09) : 957 - 964
  • [39] Risk and prediction of kidney failure early after liver transplantation
    Innanen, Tuija
    Sallinen, Ville
    Helantera, Ilkka
    Eerola, Verner
    Nordin, Arno
    Aberg, Fredrik
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 59 (04) : 461 - 468
  • [40] Serum Sodium and Survival Benefit of Liver Transplantation
    Sharma, Pratima
    Schaubel, Douglas E.
    Goodrich, Nathan P.
    Merion, Robert M.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 21 (03) : 308 - 313