Amantadine versus biperiden: A double-blind study of treatment efficacy in neuroleptic extrapyramidal movement disorders

被引:23
|
作者
Konig, P
Chwatal, K
Havelec, L
Riedl, F
Schubert, H
Schultes, H
机构
[1] UNIV VIENNA,VIENNA,AUSTRIA
[2] HOSP PSYCHIAT,HALL IN TIROL,AUSTRIA
关键词
amantadine; anticholinergics; neuroleptic parkinsonism; side effects; glutamatergic system;
D O I
10.1159/000119254
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Anticholinergic treatment of neuroleptic extrapyramidal movement disorders (EPS) has been associated with induction of tardive dyskinesia. Also an increasing abuse of anticholinergics by schizophrenic patients is noted. Since as early as 1976, positive effects of amantadine (AMA) on neuroleptic EPS have been described, therefore a controlled study of these reports seemed worthwhile. Forty-two schizophrenic patients (of which 7 were dropouts) of three centers entered the study and were treated for EPS in a double-blind design: 18 (11 m, 7 f) with AMA and 17 (8 m, 9 f) with biperiden (BIP). Identical preparations of AMA (100 mg, tid) and BIP (2 mg, tid) were used in treatment of haloperidol-induced EPS (AMA, mean 22.4 mg haloperidol; BIP, mean 19.6 mg haloperidol). Effects of treatment and possible side effects were rated: EPS for the intensity of EPS, BPRS for quantification of psychotic symptoms, FSUCL for rating the side effects and KUSTA to document patients' mood. Ratings were recorded on days 0, 3, 7, 14, 28 and at discontinuation, respectively. All patients were treated with haloperidol and levomepromazine (for tranquilization/sleep induction) and the respective antiparkinsonian agent for 14 days. Patient characteristics did not differ significantly in either groups. In the AMA treatment group, 2 patients dropped out for noncompliance, in the BIP group, 5 (3 no effect, 1 noncompliance, 1 agitation). All results as recorded with the different rating instruments showed a significant (p < 0.01) overall improvement, whereas no significant differences between treatment groups could be determined, notably the treatment effect of both drugs on EPS was similar. Thus, the application of AMA in cases of neuroleptic EPS seems justified and is a useful alternative to anticholinergic drugs. Certain advantageous aspects of AMA treatment of EPS with regard to the glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia and tardive dyskinesia are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 84
页数:5
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [31] RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY OF NABUMETONE AND PIROXICAM IN THE TREATMENT OF OSTEOARTHRITIS IN DUTCH GENERAL-PRACTICE - EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY
    DEBOCK, GH
    HERMANS, J
    MULDER, JD
    PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 1993, 15 (03): : 132 - 138
  • [32] The analgesic efficacy of IV acetaminophen for acute postoperative pain in C-section patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Bernstein, Jeffrey
    Spitzer, Yelena
    Ohaegbulam, Kim
    Reddy, Shamantha
    Song, Jing
    Romanelli, Erik
    Nair, Singh
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (05): : 933 - 940
  • [33] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin. with or without amantadine in treatment-naive patients with-chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection
    Ferenci, P
    Formann, E
    Laferl, H
    Gschwantler, M
    Hackl, F
    Brunner, H
    Hubmann, R
    Datz, C
    Stauber, R
    Steindl-Munda, P
    Kessler, HH
    Klingler, A
    Gangl, A
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 44 (02) : 275 - 282
  • [34] Stop of proton-pump inhibitor treatment in patients with liver cirrhosis (STOPPIT): study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, controlled, randomized, double-blind trial
    Malte H. Wehmeyer
    Thomas Horvatits
    Anika Buchholz
    Linda Krause
    Sarah Walter
    Antonia Zapf
    Ansgar W. Lohse
    Johannes Kluwe
    Trials, 23
  • [35] Stop of proton-pump inhibitor treatment in patients with liver cirrhosis (STOPPIT): study protocol for a prospective, multicentre, controlled, randomized, double-blind trial
    Wehmeyer, Malte H.
    Horvatits, Thomas
    Buchholz, Anika
    Krause, Linda
    Walter, Sarah
    Zapf, Antonia
    Lohse, Ansgar W.
    Kluwe, Johannes
    TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [36] A randomized, double-blind controlled trial of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin vs. interferon alpha-2b and amantadine for treatment of chronic hepatitis C non-responder to interferon monotherapy
    Younossi, ZM
    Mullen, KD
    Zakko, W
    Hodnick, S
    Brand, E
    Barnes, DS
    Carey, WD
    McCullough, AC
    Easley, K
    Boparai, N
    Gramlich, T
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 34 (01) : 128 - 133
  • [37] Evaluation of low-level laser therapy in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced mucositis: A double-blind randomized study in head and neck cancer patients
    Carvalho, P. A. G.
    Jaguar, G. C.
    Pellizzon, A. C.
    Prado, J. D.
    Lopes, R. N.
    Alves, F. A.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 47 (12) : 1176 - 1181
  • [38] Can the combined treatment of solifenacin and imipramine has a role in desmopressin refractory monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis? A prospective double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study
    Samir, Mohamed
    Mahmoud, Mahmoud A.
    Elawady, Hossam
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2021, 88 (04) : 369 - 373
  • [39] Short-term side effects of 0.2% alcohol-free chlorhexidine mouthrinse used as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment:: A double-blind clinical study
    Gurgan, Cem A.
    Zaim, Eylem
    Bakirsoy, Isil
    Soykan, Emel
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 77 (03) : 370 - 384
  • [40] A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group comparison of valsartan and amlodipine in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in elderly patients:: TheVal-Syst study
    Malacco, E
    Varì, N
    Capuano, V
    Spagnuolo, V
    Borgnino, C
    Palatini, P
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 25 (11) : 2765 - 2780