Palatal needle-free anesthesia for upper molars extraction. A randomized clinical trial

被引:5
|
作者
Amorim, Klinger de Souza [1 ]
Franz-Montan, Michelle [1 ]
Groppo, Francisco Carlos [1 ]
Muniz, Bruno Vilela [1 ]
Macena de Araujo, Jaiza Samara [1 ]
Ferreira Santana, Jose Vanison [2 ]
Gercina Carvalho Dantas, Anne Caroline [2 ]
de Paula, Eneida [3 ]
de Almeida Souza, Liane Maciel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Pharmacol Anesthesiol & Therapeut Dept, Piracicaba Dent Sch, 901 Limeira Ave, BR-13414903 Piracibaba, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sergipe, Oral Surg & Anesthesiol Area Dent Dept, BR-49060108 Cidade Nova, Sergipe, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Biol Inst, Biochem & Tissue Biol Dept, St Monteiro Lobato 255, BR-13083862 Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
EMLA; Dental extraction; Lipo somes; Local anesthetics; Topical gel; LIPOSOME-ENCAPSULATED ROPIVACAINE; TOPICAL ANESTHESIA; EFFICACY; GEL; ANXIETY; MUCOSA; DURATION; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcms.2020.05.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the ability of liposomal and non-liposomal lidocaine and prilocaine in hydrogel formulations to promote topical anesthesia in palatal mucosa during upper molar extractions. Methods: In this randomized, cross over, triple-blinded clinical trial, a liposomal and a non-liposomal formulation of the eutectic mixture of local anesthetics, 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine, were used to promote palatal anesthesia without the local anesthetic infiltration during bilateral upper molars extractions. Results: From the total of 40 patients included in this study, the non-liposomal eutectic lidocaineprilocaine formulation failed in 40% of cases, unlike the liposomal formulation, which was effective for all patients (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the liposomal formulation (26.75 +/- 7,47 min) induced longer anesthesia duration (t-test, p < 0.0001) than the non-liposomal formulation (16.78 +/- 4.75 min). No mucosal ulceration or discomfort was reported for both formulations. Conclusion: The liposomal formulation was able to induce adequate anesthesia in palatal mucosa during dental extraction, avoiding the local anesthetic infiltration. For the first time, a topical formulation allowed upper molars surgical removal without injection of any local anesthetic agent into palatal mucosa in adults. (C) 2020 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 819
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Plus Cryotherapy Anesthesia Success in Pulpectomy of Primary Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Elheeny, Ahmad Abdel Hamid
    Turky, Mohammed
    PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 45 (02) : 105 - 110
  • [32] The Clinical Efficacy of EMLA as a Topical Anesthetic Agent Instead of Palatal Injection During Maxillary Dental Extractions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chugh, Ankita
    Singh, Surjit
    Khatana, Shruti
    Gaur, Shubham
    Patnana, Arun Kumar
    Chugh, Vinay
    Kumar, Pravin
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2023, 22 (01) : 172 - 177
  • [33] The Clinical Efficacy of EMLA as a Topical Anesthetic Agent Instead of Palatal Injection During Maxillary Dental Extractions: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ankita Chugh
    Surjit Singh
    Shruti Khatana
    Shubham Gaur
    Arun Kumar Patnana
    Vinay Chugh
    Pravin Kumar
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2023, 22 : 172 - 177
  • [34] Evaluation of bone repair with platelet-rich fibrin following the extraction of impacted third molars - randomized clinical trial
    Rocha Rodrigues, Ewerton Daniel
    Pontual, Andrea dos Anjos
    de Paiva Macedo, Romulo Augusto
    Nascimento, Eduarda
    do Egito Vasconcelos, Belmiro Cavalcanti
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2023, 28 (05): : E433 - E441
  • [35] Mucoadhesive, Thermoreversible Hydrogel, Containing Tetracaine-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for Topical, Intranasal Needle-Free Anesthesia
    Calixto, Giovana Maria Fioramonti
    Muniz, Bruno Vilela
    Castro, Simone R.
    de Araujo, Jaiza Samara Macena
    Amorim, Klinger de Souza
    Ribeiro, Ligia N. M.
    Ferreira, Luiz Eduardo Nunes
    de Araujo, Daniele Ribeiro
    de Paula, Eneida
    Franz-Montan, Michelle
    PHARMACEUTICS, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [36] Is the only buccal infiltration anesthesia enough for extraction of mandibular anterior incisors and premolar teeth? A split-mouth randomized clinical trial
    Ege, Bilal
    Demirkol, Mehmet
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (05) : 3077 - 3085
  • [37] Safety and Efficacy of Needle-free Powder Lidocaine Delivery System in Adult Patients Undergoing Venipuncture or Peripheral Venous Cannulation A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
    Zempsky, William T.
    Schmitz, Michael L.
    Meyer, James M.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 32 (03) : 211 - 217
  • [38] Effectiveness of Articaine Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia for Mandibular Premolar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
    Majid, Omer Waleed
    Muhammad, Zaid Abdulazeez
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (09) : 1784 - 1789
  • [39] Efficacy of buccal infiltration anaesthesia with articaine for extraction of mandibular molars: a clinical trial
    Rayati, F.
    Noruziha, A.
    Jabbarian, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 56 (07) : 607 - 610
  • [40] Effect of platelet-rich fibrin palatal bandage on pain scores and wound healing after free gingival graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Maha A. Bahammam
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2018, 22 : 3179 - 3188