Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Initial Experience of 267 Cases

被引:0
|
作者
Islamoglu, Ekrem [1 ]
Aktas, Yasin [1 ]
Ari, Ozgur [1 ]
Anil, Hakan [1 ]
Yildiz, Ali [1 ]
Ates, Mutlu [1 ]
Savas, Murat [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Antalya Training & Res Hosp, Clin Urol, Antalya, Turkey
来源
UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY | 2019年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
Prostate cancer; robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy; outcomes; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; LEARNING-CURVE; CANCER;
D O I
10.4274/uob.galenos.2018.1109
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To present our experience of 267 consecutive patients treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and assess the perioperative and postoperative outcomes. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 267 men who underwent RALP in our clinic between March 2015 and April 2018. Preoperative clinical data including age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason score, and number of positive cores were noted. Perioperative parameters such as operative time and intraoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative parameters including hematocrit change, length of hospital stay, and catheter removal date were noted. Pathological outcomes included pathological Gleason score; positive surgical margin (PSM) status; extracapsular, lymphovascular, perineural, and seminal vesicle invasion; and lymph node positivity. The Clavien-Dindo system was used to classify surgical complications. Results: The mean age of the patients was 64.2 +/- 6.4 years and the median PSA was 8.27 ng/dL. The mean operative time was 196.4 +/- 59.4 min and median hematocrit decrease was 3.9%. The overall PSM rate was 21.34% and this rate increased significantly with final pathological stage from 12.97% for pT2 to 35.48% for pT3 (p<0.05). Over a mean follow-up time of 19 months, biochemical recurrence occured in 29 patients (9.7%) and a total of 35 patients (22%) required additional treatment. A total of 29 patients (10.86%) had complications and 1 patient required surgical intervention in the first 48 hours after surgery. The median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days and median time to urethral catheter removal was 10 days. Conclusion: Our initial experience with RALP is promising. Oncological outcomes were satisfactory, with patients benefiting from the advantages of the minimally invasive surgical approach.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 17
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bowel Complication during Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Hung, Chi-Feng
    Yang, Cheng-Kuang
    Cheng, Chen-Li
    Ou, Yen-Chuan
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 31 (10) : 3497 - 3501
  • [42] Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Allan, Christie
    Ilic, Dragan
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2016, 96 (04) : 373 - 378
  • [43] Effect of minimizing tension during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on urinary function recovery
    Kowalczyk, Keith J.
    Huang, Andy C.
    Hevelone, Nathanael D.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Yu, Hua-yin
    Lynch, John H.
    Hu, Jim C.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (03) : 515 - 521
  • [44] Combined Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy and Radical Prostatectomy
    Patel, Manish N.
    Eun, Daniel
    Menon, Mani
    Rogers, Craig G.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2009, 13 (02) : 229 - 232
  • [45] Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy - the 5-year Romanian experience
    Logigan, Horia
    Andras, Julia
    Pop, Cristian-Doru
    Muresan, Marius
    Crisan, Nicolae
    Coman, Ioan
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2015, 20 (04): : 1068 - 1073
  • [46] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after aborted retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Kowalczyk K.J.
    Huang A.C.
    Williams S.B.
    Yu H.-Y.
    Hu J.C.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2013, 7 (3) : 301 - 304
  • [47] Comparison of open and robotic-assisted prostatectomy: The University of British Columbia experience
    Gagnon, Louis-Olivier
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    Lynch, Kenny
    Hurtado, Antonio
    Gleave, Martin E.
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2014, 8 (3-4): : 92 - 97
  • [48] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a report of the current state
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Shah, Ketul
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Thaly, Rahul
    Coughlin, Geoff
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2007, 7 (09) : 1269 - 1278
  • [49] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP): a new way to training
    Rocha R.
    Fiorelli R.K.A.
    Buogo G.
    Rubistein M.
    Mattos R.M.
    Frota R.
    Coelho R.F.
    Palmer K.
    Patel V.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2016, 10 (1) : 19 - 25
  • [50] Recurrent sigmoid volvulus after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Oberoi, Kunind
    Sethi, Kapil
    UROLOGY CASE REPORTS, 2025, 59