Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Initial Experience of 267 Cases

被引:0
|
作者
Islamoglu, Ekrem [1 ]
Aktas, Yasin [1 ]
Ari, Ozgur [1 ]
Anil, Hakan [1 ]
Yildiz, Ali [1 ]
Ates, Mutlu [1 ]
Savas, Murat [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Antalya Training & Res Hosp, Clin Urol, Antalya, Turkey
来源
UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY | 2019年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
Prostate cancer; robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy; outcomes; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; LEARNING-CURVE; CANCER;
D O I
10.4274/uob.galenos.2018.1109
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To present our experience of 267 consecutive patients treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and assess the perioperative and postoperative outcomes. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 267 men who underwent RALP in our clinic between March 2015 and April 2018. Preoperative clinical data including age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason score, and number of positive cores were noted. Perioperative parameters such as operative time and intraoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative parameters including hematocrit change, length of hospital stay, and catheter removal date were noted. Pathological outcomes included pathological Gleason score; positive surgical margin (PSM) status; extracapsular, lymphovascular, perineural, and seminal vesicle invasion; and lymph node positivity. The Clavien-Dindo system was used to classify surgical complications. Results: The mean age of the patients was 64.2 +/- 6.4 years and the median PSA was 8.27 ng/dL. The mean operative time was 196.4 +/- 59.4 min and median hematocrit decrease was 3.9%. The overall PSM rate was 21.34% and this rate increased significantly with final pathological stage from 12.97% for pT2 to 35.48% for pT3 (p<0.05). Over a mean follow-up time of 19 months, biochemical recurrence occured in 29 patients (9.7%) and a total of 35 patients (22%) required additional treatment. A total of 29 patients (10.86%) had complications and 1 patient required surgical intervention in the first 48 hours after surgery. The median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days and median time to urethral catheter removal was 10 days. Conclusion: Our initial experience with RALP is promising. Oncological outcomes were satisfactory, with patients benefiting from the advantages of the minimally invasive surgical approach.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 17
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Overcoming the Learning Curve for Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Freire, Marcos P.
    Choi, Wesley W.
    Lei, Yin
    Carvas, Fernando
    Hu, Jim C.
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 37 (01) : 37 - +
  • [22] Effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on surgical pathology specimens
    Heng Hong
    Lin Mel
    Jonathan Taylor
    Qiang Wu
    Hugh Reeves
    Diagnostic Pathology, 7
  • [23] Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Kordan, Yakup
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    Altamar, Hernan O.
    Clark, Peter E.
    Chang, Sam S.
    Davis, Rodney
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Baumgartner, Roxy
    Mishra, Vineet
    Chan, Robert C.
    Smith, Joseph A., Jr.
    Cookson, Michael S.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (07) : 1036 - 1040
  • [24] Complications of Robotic-assisted laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Experience Sharing from 2000 Cases Involving a Single Surgeon
    Lu, Chin-Heng
    Ou, Yen-Chuan
    Lin, Yi-Sheng
    Huang, Li-Hua
    Weng, Wei-Chun
    Hsu, Chao-Yu
    Tung, Min-Che
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 33 (04) : 192 - 198
  • [25] Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Bladou, F.
    Walz, J.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2009, 19 : S181 - S186
  • [26] Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Thomas, C.
    Neisius, A.
    Roos, F. C.
    Hampel, C.
    Thueroff, J. W.
    UROLOGE, 2015, 54 (02): : 178 - 182
  • [27] Ureteral Ligation During Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
    Baetzhold, Daniel
    Dinerman, Brian
    Rutkowski, John
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [28] Current role of salvage robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    D. Wetherell
    D. Bolton
    L. Kavanagh
    M. Perera
    World Journal of Urology, 2013, 31 : 463 - 469
  • [29] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in men with metabolic syndrome
    Kwon, Young Suk
    Leapman, Michael
    McBride, Russell B.
    Hobbs, Adele R.
    Collingwood, Shemille A.
    Stensland, Kristian D.
    Samadi, David B.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 32 (01) : 40.e9 - 40.e16
  • [30] The impact of days off between cases on perioperative outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Shane M. Pearce
    Joseph J. Pariser
    Sanjay G. Patel
    Blake B. Anderson
    Scott E. Eggener
    Gregory P. Zagaja
    World Journal of Urology, 2016, 34 : 269 - 274