Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium

被引:7
|
作者
Loomans, Laura [1 ]
Botella, Anali Conesa [1 ]
D'hondt, Agnes [1 ]
Verschueren, Jacob [1 ]
Van den Bossche, Dorien [1 ]
Van Esbroeck, Marjan [1 ]
Jacobs, Jan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Trop Med, Dept Clin Sci, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Malaria; Diagnostic performance; Belgium; EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12936-019-2731-0
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe Belgian Reference Laboratory for Plasmodium offers a free-of-charge reference testing of malaria-positive or doubtful samples to clinical laboratories.MethodsThe final malaria diagnosis from the Reference Laboratory (microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and Plasmodium species-specific PCR) were compared with the final diagnosis from peripheral Belgian laboratories. The Reference Laboratory reports were analysed for all samples submitted between 2013 and 2017. Criteria assessed included the diagnosis of malaria, Plasmodium species identification including mixed infections, and in case of Plasmodium falciparum, the parasite density and the presence of sexual and asexual stages.ResultsA total of 947 non-duplicate samples were included. Reference testing confirmed 96.3% (893/927) and 90.0% (18/20) samples submitted as positive and negative, respectively, the two missed diagnoses were samples with Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae. Submitting laboratories had correctly identified P. falciparum in 95.1% (508/534) samples with P. falciparum single infection. They had correctly diagnosed the species in 62.9% (95/151) single non-falciparum samples and had reported non-falciparum' in another 26 (17.2%) samples; most errors occurred among P. malariae (n=8/21, 38.1%) and P. ovale (n=14/51, 27.5%). Only one of the 21 mixed Plasmodium species infections had been diagnosed as such by the submitting laboratories; in three of them, P. falciparum had been overlooked. Taken single and mixed infections together, P. falciparum was diagnosed in 98.6% (546/554) samples. Among 471 single P. falciparum samples available for comparison, laboratories had correctly reported parasite densities above 2% in 87.5% (70/80) samples; they had incorrectly reported parasite densities>2% in an extra 52 (8.9%) samples. Laboratories had correctly reported P. falciparum schizonts and gametocytes in 25.6% (11/43) and 56.7% (17/30) samples, respectively.ConclusionDiagnostic laboratories in a malaria non-endemic setting provided excellent diagnosis of malaria and P. falciparum, reasonably good diagnosis of non-falciparum infections and acceptable calculation of P. falciparum parasite density.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Malaria diagnosis: A review
    Avila, SLM
    Ferreira, AW
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1996, 29 (04) : 431 - 443
  • [42] Advances in malaria diagnosis
    Hawkes, Michael
    Kain, Kevin C.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2007, 5 (03) : 485 - 495
  • [43] Quality of malaria microscopy in 12 district hospital laboratories in Tanzania
    Mbakilwa, Hilda
    Manga, Chacha
    Kibona, Stafford
    Mtei, Frank
    Meta, Judith
    Shoo, Aikande
    Amos, Ben
    Reyburn, Hugh
    PATHOGENS AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2012, 106 (06) : 330 - 334
  • [44] Malaria, Control and Diagnosis
    Hatam, G. R.
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 12 (03) : 239 - 241
  • [45] Clinical significance of molecular methods in the diagnosis of imported malaria in returning travelers in Serbia
    Dakic, Zorica
    Ivovic, Vladimir
    Pavlovic, Milorad
    Lavadinovic, Lidija
    Markovic, Marija
    Djurkovic-Djakovic, Olgica
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 29 : 24 - 30
  • [46] External quality assessment for molecular diagnostic laboratories in Belgium: Can we improve it?
    Dufraing, Kelly
    Lierman, Els
    Vankeerberghen, Anne
    Franke, Sabine
    Dequeker, Els
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2020, 25 (01) : 39 - 49
  • [47] External quality assessment for molecular diagnostic laboratories in Belgium: Can we improve it?
    Kelly Dufraing
    Els Lierman
    Anne Vankeerberghen
    Sabine Franke
    Els Dequeker
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2020, 25 : 39 - 49
  • [48] Clinical Evaluation of a Loop-Mediated Amplification Kit for Diagnosis of Imported Malaria
    Polley, Spencer D.
    Gonzalez, Iveth J.
    Mohamed, Deqa
    Daly, Rosemarie
    Bowers, Kathy
    Watson, Julie
    Mewse, Emma
    Armstrong, Margaret
    Gray, Christen
    Perkins, Mark D.
    Bell, David
    Kanda, Hidetoshi
    Tomita, Norihiro
    Kubota, Yutaka
    Mori, Yasuyoshi
    Chiodini, Peter L.
    Sutherland, Colin J.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 208 (04) : 637 - 644
  • [49] Evaluation of the OnSite (Pf/Pan) rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of clinical malaria
    Abu Naser Mohon
    Rubayet Elahi
    Milka Patracia Podder
    Khaja Mohiuddin
    Mohammad Sharif Hossain
    Wasif A Khan
    Rashidul Haque
    Mohammad Shafiul Alam
    Malaria Journal, 11
  • [50] The accuracy of clinical malaria case reporting at primary health care facilities in Honiara, Solomon Islands
    Ayano Kunimitsu
    Malaria Journal, 8