Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium

被引:7
|
作者
Loomans, Laura [1 ]
Botella, Anali Conesa [1 ]
D'hondt, Agnes [1 ]
Verschueren, Jacob [1 ]
Van den Bossche, Dorien [1 ]
Van Esbroeck, Marjan [1 ]
Jacobs, Jan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Trop Med, Dept Clin Sci, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Malaria; Diagnostic performance; Belgium; EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12936-019-2731-0
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe Belgian Reference Laboratory for Plasmodium offers a free-of-charge reference testing of malaria-positive or doubtful samples to clinical laboratories.MethodsThe final malaria diagnosis from the Reference Laboratory (microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and Plasmodium species-specific PCR) were compared with the final diagnosis from peripheral Belgian laboratories. The Reference Laboratory reports were analysed for all samples submitted between 2013 and 2017. Criteria assessed included the diagnosis of malaria, Plasmodium species identification including mixed infections, and in case of Plasmodium falciparum, the parasite density and the presence of sexual and asexual stages.ResultsA total of 947 non-duplicate samples were included. Reference testing confirmed 96.3% (893/927) and 90.0% (18/20) samples submitted as positive and negative, respectively, the two missed diagnoses were samples with Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae. Submitting laboratories had correctly identified P. falciparum in 95.1% (508/534) samples with P. falciparum single infection. They had correctly diagnosed the species in 62.9% (95/151) single non-falciparum samples and had reported non-falciparum' in another 26 (17.2%) samples; most errors occurred among P. malariae (n=8/21, 38.1%) and P. ovale (n=14/51, 27.5%). Only one of the 21 mixed Plasmodium species infections had been diagnosed as such by the submitting laboratories; in three of them, P. falciparum had been overlooked. Taken single and mixed infections together, P. falciparum was diagnosed in 98.6% (546/554) samples. Among 471 single P. falciparum samples available for comparison, laboratories had correctly reported parasite densities above 2% in 87.5% (70/80) samples; they had incorrectly reported parasite densities>2% in an extra 52 (8.9%) samples. Laboratories had correctly reported P. falciparum schizonts and gametocytes in 25.6% (11/43) and 56.7% (17/30) samples, respectively.ConclusionDiagnostic laboratories in a malaria non-endemic setting provided excellent diagnosis of malaria and P. falciparum, reasonably good diagnosis of non-falciparum infections and acceptable calculation of P. falciparum parasite density.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Malaria Diagnostic Practices in US Laboratories in 2017
    Prestel, Christopher
    Tan, Kathrine R.
    Abanyie, Francisca
    Jerris, Robert
    Gutman, Julie R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 56 (08)
  • [22] Malaria diagnosis for malaria elimination
    Zimmerman, Peter A.
    Howes, Rosalind E.
    CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 28 (05) : 446 - 454
  • [23] A prospective evaluation of a clinical algorithm for the diagnosis of malaria in Gambian children
    Bojang, KA
    Obaro, S
    Morison, LA
    Greenwood, BM
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2000, 5 (04) : 231 - 236
  • [24] Clinical significance of PLT for diagnosis and treatment monitoring in imported malaria
    Fu, Shui
    Hu, Qi-Lei
    Zhang, Liang
    Han, Xiao-Jun
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [25] Clinical diagnosis of malaria: Can the patients help us improve?
    Philipps, J
    Radloff, PD
    Lehman, LG
    Baksai, L
    Milovanovic, D
    Nkeyi, M
    Wernsdorfer, WH
    Kremsner, PG
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1996, 90 (01) : 42 - 42
  • [26] Accuracy of diagnosis among clinical malaria patients: comparing microscopy, RDT and a highly sensitive quantitative PCR looking at the implications for submicroscopic infections
    Stephen Opoku Afriyie
    Thomas Kwame Addison
    Yilekal Gebre
    Abdul-Hakim Mutala
    Kwasi Baako Antwi
    Dawood Ackom Abbas
    Kofi Agyapong Addo
    Austine Tweneboah
    Nana Kwame Ayisi-Boateng
    Cristian Koepfli
    Kingsley Badu
    Malaria Journal, 22
  • [27] Accuracy of diagnosis among clinical malaria patients: comparing microscopy, RDT and a highly sensitive quantitative PCR looking at the implications for submicroscopic infections
    Afriyie, Stephen Opoku
    Addison, Thomas Kwame
    Gebre, Yilekal
    Mutala, Abdul-Hakim
    Antwi, Kwasi Baako
    Abbas, Dawood Ackom
    Addo, Kofi Agyapong
    Tweneboah, Austine
    Ayisi-Boateng, Nana Kwame
    Koepfli, Cristian
    Badu, Kingsley
    MALARIA JOURNAL, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [28] Multicenter Pivotal Clinical Trial of Urine Malaria Test for Rapid Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria
    Oyibo, Wellington A.
    Ezeigwe, Nnenna
    Ntadom, Godwin
    Oladosu, Oladipo O.
    Rainwater-Loveth, Kaitlin
    O'Meara, Wendy
    Okpokoro, Evaezi
    Brieger, William
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 55 (01) : 253 - 263
  • [29] Accuracy of malaria rapid diagnosis test Optimal-IT® in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo
    Muhindo, Hypolite Mavoko
    Ilombe, Gillon
    Meya, Ruth
    Mitashi, Patrick M.
    Kutekemeni, Albert
    Gasigwa, Didier
    Lutumba, Pascal
    Van Geertruyden, Jean-Pierre
    MALARIA JOURNAL, 2012, 11
  • [30] Comparing the accuracy of lay diagnosis of childhood malaria and pneumonia with that of the revised IMCI guidelines in Nigeria
    Elimian, K. O.
    Myles, P. R.
    Phalkey, R.
    Sadoh, A.
    Pritchard, C.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 43 (04) : 772 - 779