Evaluation of an Inexpensive Growth Medium for Direct Detection of Escherichia coli in Temperate and Sub-Tropical Waters

被引:15
作者
Bain, Robert E. S. [1 ]
Woodall, Claire [2 ]
Elliott, John [3 ]
Arnold, Benjamin F. [4 ]
Tung, Rosalind [5 ]
Morley, Robert [6 ]
du Preez, Martella [7 ]
Bartram, Jamie K. [8 ]
Davis, Anthony P. [2 ]
Gundry, Stephen W. [9 ]
Pedley, Stephen [3 ]
机构
[1] UNICEF, New York, NY 10038 USA
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Chem, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Surrey, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Guildford GU2 5XH, Surrey, England
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[5] CPI Int, Santa Rosa, CA USA
[6] Publ Hlth England, Bristol, Avon, England
[7] CSIR, ZA-0001 Pretoria, South Africa
[8] Univ N Carolina, Water Inst, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[9] Brightwater Diagnost Ltd, Bath, Avon, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 10期
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
BETA-D-GLUCURONIDASE; DRINKING-WATER; TOTAL COLIFORMS; FRESH-WATER; H2S TEST; ENUMERATION; TESTS; COLILERT-18; COUNTRIES; BACTERIA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0140997
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The cost and complexity of traditional methods for the detection of faecal indicator bacteria, including E. coli, hinder widespread monitoring of drinking water quality, especially in low-income countries and outside controlled laboratory settings. In these settings the problem is exacerbated by the lack of inexpensive media for the detection of E. coli in drinking water. We developed a new low-cost growth medium, aquatest (AT), and validated its use for the direct detection of E. coli in temperate and sub-tropical drinking waters using IDEXX Quanti-Tray (R). AT was compared with IDEXX Colilert-18 (R) and either EC-MUG or MLSB for detecting low levels of E. coli from water samples from temperate (n = 140; Bristol, UK) and subtropical regions (n = 50, Pretoria/Tshwane, South Africa). Confirmatory testing (n = 418 and 588, respectively) and the comparison of quantitative results were used to assess performance. Sensitivity of AT was higher than Colilert-18 (R) for water samples in the UK [98.0% vs. 86.9%; p<0.0001] and South Africa [99.5% vs. 93.2%; p = 0.0030]. There was no significant difference in specificity, which was high for both media (>95% in both settings). Quantitative results were comparable and within expected limits. AT is reliable and accurate for the detection of E. coli in temperate and subtropical drinking water. The composition of the new medium is reported herein and can be used freely.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Adapting Enzyme-Based Microbial Water Quality Analysis to Remote Areas in Low-Income Countries
    Abramson, Adam
    Benami, Maya
    Weisbrod, Noam
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (18) : 10494 - 10501
  • [2] Effect of transport at ambient temperature on detection and isolation of Vibrio cholerae from environmental samples
    Alam, M
    Sadique, A
    Nur-A-Hasan
    Bhuiyan, NA
    Nair, GB
    Siddique, AK
    Sack, DA
    Ahsan, S
    Huq, A
    Sack, RB
    Colwell, RR
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 72 (03) : 2185 - 2190
  • [3] Differential susceptibility of aeromonads and coliforms to cefsulodin
    Alonso, JL
    Amoros, I
    Alonso, MA
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 62 (06) : 1885 - 1888
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, Progress on Sanitation and Drinking Water: 2015 Update and MDG Assessment
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2018, Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality
  • [6] Bacteria holding times for fecal coliform by mFC agar method and total coliform and Escherichia coli by ColilertA®-18 Quanti-TrayA® method
    Aulenbach, Brent T.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2010, 161 (1-4) : 147 - 159
  • [7] A Summary Catalogue of Microbial Drinking Water Tests for Low and Medium Resource Settings
    Bain, Robert
    Bartram, Jamie
    Elliott, Mark
    Matthews, Robert
    McMahan, Lanakila
    Tung, Rosalind
    Chuang, Patty
    Gundry, Stephen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 9 (05): : 1609 - 1625
  • [8] Baird R.B., 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater
  • [9] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [10] Comparison of methods and confirmation tests for the recovery Escherichia coli in water
    Bonadonna, L.
    Cataldo, C.
    Semproni, M.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2007, 213 (1-3) : 18 - 23