Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5000 g

被引:112
作者
Kurmanavicius, J [1 ]
Burkhardt, T [1 ]
Wisser, J [1 ]
Huch, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Perinatal Res Unit, Dept Obstet, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
estimated fetal weight; reliability; ultrasound biometry;
D O I
10.1515/JPM.2004.028
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the accuracy of birth weight in different birth weight (BW) groups using widely accepted formulas for fetal weight estimation (EFW). The secondary purpose was to estimate the role of examiners on the accuracy of EFW. Methods: The crosssectional data were obtained from 5612 pregnant women. Fetal weight was estimated for each fetus using the formulas of Campbell and Wilkin, Shepard, 2 formulas of Hadlock and Merz. Inclusion criteria were: singleton pregnancy, complete ultrasound parameters, EFW obtained within the last week prior to delivery, the live born infant without congenital malformations or hydrops. Results: The highest intraclass correlation coefficient and the most stable results in all BW groups were generated with both Hadlock formulas. Both Hadlock and Campbell formulas had the lowest percent errors (PE) in BW groups between <1500 g and 3500 g. Shepard and Merz formulas had lower PEs in BW groups between 3501 g and >4000 g. However in BW groups under 3500 g they were imprecise. The PE of EFW varied from -4.0+/-8.5% to 1.3+/-8.5% between examiners. Conclusions: Both Hadlock formulas showed the most stable results in all of the weight groups. There is also a need for routine evaluation of the accuracy of EFW for every examiner, to make suggestions, what fetal measurements must be improved to improve EFW.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 161
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J MATERN FETAL MED
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL ABDOMEN CIRCUMFERENCE IN ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT [J].
CAMPBELL, S ;
WILKIN, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1975, 82 (09) :689-697
[4]  
Chauhan SP, 1999, J REPROD MED, V44, P969
[5]   Validity of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight [J].
Chien, PFW ;
Owen, P ;
Khan, KS .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (06) :856-860
[6]  
FIELD N, 1995, OBSTET GYNECOL, P102
[7]   ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT WITH THE USE OF HEAD, BODY, AND FEMUR MEASUREMENTS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
HADLOCK, FP ;
HARRIST, RB ;
SHARMAN, RS ;
DETER, RL ;
PARK, SK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 151 (03) :333-337
[8]   ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT IN THE CLINICALLY MACROSOMIC FETUS [J].
HIRATA, GI ;
MEDEARIS, AL ;
HORENSTEIN, J ;
BEAR, MB ;
PLATT, LD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 162 (01) :238-242
[9]   Fetal ultrasound biometry: 1. Head reference values [J].
Kurmanavicius, J ;
Wright, EM ;
Royston, P ;
Wisser, J ;
Huch, R ;
Huch, A ;
Zimmermann, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (02) :126-135
[10]   Fetal ultrasound biometry: 2. Abdomen and femur length reference values [J].
Kurmanavicius, J ;
Wright, EM ;
Royston, P ;
Zimmermann, R ;
Huch, R ;
Huch, A ;
Wisser, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (02) :136-143