Food Systems Sustainability: An Examination of Different Viewpoints on Food System Change

被引:14
作者
Haysom, Gareth [1 ]
Olsson, E. Gunilla Almered [2 ]
Dymitrow, Mirek [3 ,4 ]
Opiyo, Paul [5 ]
Buck, Nick Taylor [6 ]
Oloko, Michael [5 ]
Spring, Charlotte [6 ]
Fermskog, Kristina [7 ]
Ingelhag, Karin [8 ]
Kotze, Shelley [3 ,8 ]
Agong, Stephen Gaya [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, African Ctr Cities, EGS Bldg, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Sch Global Studies, Box 700, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Chalmers Univ Technol, Mistra Urban Futures, Lararegatan 3, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Univ Gothenburg, Sch Business Econ & Law, Dept Econ & Soc, Unit Human Geog, POB 625, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Univ Sci & Technol, Kisumu 40100, Kisumu County, Kenya
[6] Univ Sheffield, Urban Inst, 219 Portobello St, Sheffield S1 4DP, S Yorkshire, England
[7] City Gothenburg, Dept Environm, Box 7012, S-40231 Gothenburg, Sweden
[8] Business Reg Gothenburg, City Hall, SE-40482 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
urban food system; food systems change; wicked problems; sustainability; urban food security; CROSS-SECTOR PARTNERSHIPS; FARM-ANIMAL-WELFARE; AGRICULTURE; FRAMEWORK; SECURITY; POLICY; COPRODUCTION; DECLINE;
D O I
10.3390/su11123337
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global food insecurity levels remain stubbornly high. One of the surest ways to grasp the scale and consequence of global inequality is through a food systems lens. In a predominantly urban world, urban food systems present a useful lens to engage a wide variety of urban (and global) challenges-so called wicked problems.' This paper describes a collaborative research project between four urban food system research units, two European and two African. The project purpose was to seek out solutions to what lay between, across and within the different approaches applied in the understanding of each city's food system challenges. Contextual differences and immediate (perceived) needs resulted in very different views on the nature of the challenge and the solutions required. Value positions of individuals and their disciplinary enclaves presented further boundaries. The paper argues that finding consensus provides false solutions. Rather the identification of novel approaches to such wicked problems is contingent of these differences being brought to the fore, being part of the conversation, as devices through which common positions can be discovered, where spaces are created for the realisation of new perspectives, but also, where difference is celebrated as opposed to censored.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 106 条
  • [1] Altieri M.A., 2018, Agroecology: The Science of Sustainable Agriculture M
  • [2] Andree P., 2019, Civil Society and Social Movements in Food System Governance
  • [3] [Anonymous], 5 U CAP TOWN AFR CTR
  • [4] [Anonymous], FOOD MIL HLTH FACTS
  • [5] [Anonymous], NATURAL RESOURCE CON
  • [6] [Anonymous], HALLB MAT GOT NUL OM
  • [7] [Anonymous], CONCEPTS THEMES DESI
  • [8] [Anonymous], INT ENCY HUMAN GEOGR
  • [9] [Anonymous], SHEFF FOOD STRAT 201
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2017, RURAL URBAN REDUX B