Visually detectable resolution of intraoral dental films

被引:12
作者
Künzel, A
Scherkowski, D
Willers, R
Becker, J
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Surg, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Comp Sci, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
radiology; digitization; line pairs; observer performance; film processing;
D O I
10.1259/dmfr/22478778
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The visually utilizable resolution of intraoral dental films was examined with the naked eye, with two-fold optical magnification and after digitization using a computer display. Methods: Agfa Dentus M2(R), Kodak Ektaspeed Plus(R) and Kodak InSight(R) dental films were exposed with a line pair (1p) test pattern providing frequencies up to 16.6 1p mm(-1). Films were developed at 24degreesC in a Durr Periomat machine and at 28degreesC in a Durr AC245 machine. Forty dental students evaluated the maximum visually detectable resolution with their naked eye, with an X-ray viewer(R) (providing two-fold magnifying lenses and eliminating disturbing light) and following digitization and monitor display examination. Results: The best detectable resolution was achieved through digitization, reaching a mean of up to 16.5 1p mm(-1). With two-fold magnification, a mean of up to 13.3 1p mm(-1) could be resolved, while only 11.7 1p mm(-1) could be resolved with the naked eye. Unlike the other film types, the resolution of Ektaspeed depended on the processing type when viewing digitized images or when viewing with the naked eye. There was a trend for students above 29 years of age to detect a lower resolution with the naked eye, although they performed comparably with students below 29 years when using the X-ray viewer(R) or viewing digitized images. Conclusions: Film resolution is utilized best through digitization and secondly using a magnifying lens. With the naked eye, a mean of 11 1p mm(-1) with a broad distribution can be resolved. A magnifying lens is recommended if resolution is important or if the viewer's eyesight is reduced. Compared with E-speed films, Kodak Insight was less dependent on processing conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 389
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Detection of caries with conventional digital imaging and tuned aperture computed tomography using CRT monitor and laptop displays [J].
Abreu, M ;
Tyndall, DA ;
Ludlow, JB .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1999, 88 (02) :234-238
[2]  
Alder M E, 1995, Tex Dent J, V112, P31
[3]   Digitisation and display of intra-oral films [J].
Attaelmanan, A ;
Borg, E ;
Grondahl, HG .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (02) :97-102
[4]   Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images [J].
Cederberg, RA ;
Frederiksen, NL ;
Benson, BW ;
Shulman, JD .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 27 (05) :293-297
[5]   Influence of the digital image display monitor on observer performance [J].
Cederberg, RA ;
Frederiksen, NL ;
Benson, BW ;
Shulman, JD .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (04) :203-207
[7]   Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films [J].
Farman, TT ;
Farman, AG .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (01) :41-45
[8]   DIAGNOSTIC-IMAGING IN DENTAL IMPLANTOLOGY [J].
FREDERIKSEN, NL .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1995, 80 (05) :540-554
[9]   Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films [J].
Geist, JR ;
Brand, JW .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 30 (03) :147-152
[10]  
Grusser OJ, 2000, PHYSL MENSCHEN, P278