Private land use for public housing projects: The Influence of a Government Announcement on Housing Markets in Hong Kong

被引:12
|
作者
Liang, Cong [1 ]
Hui, Eddie C. M. [2 ]
Yip, Tsz Leung [3 ]
Huang, Yaoxuan [3 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ Hong Kong, Lee Shau Kee Sch Business & Adm, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Logist & Maritime Studies, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Housing policy; Land use policy; Search behavior; Spatial econometrics; Housing markets; SALT LAKE COUNTY; ON-THE-MARKET; PROPERTY-VALUES; REAL-ESTATE; RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES; URBAN LANDSCAPE; SELLING PRICE; TIME; IMPACT; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105067
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Insufficient land supply and housing shortage limit the development in Hong Kong. To tackle such obstacles, the Hong Kong government launched a new housing initiative in June 2018, that is, to reallocate private housing sites for public housing in East Kowloon. Yet, the initiative may give rise to two important questions: (1) how does this initiative affect the housing searching behaviour in the housing market; and (2) in what way should the new public housing be developed, if it is to be compatible with the host neighborhood by the public sector, or with the participation of the private sector. Little is known about the possible impacts of such an initiative. To fill this research gap, this paper adopts an improved spatial econometric model by incorporating spatial and temporal information to explore the above two questions. Our results indicate that (1) the announcement of the initiative leads to a 5% change in time-on-market for private housing in East Kowloon; (2) people in private property prefer more to live near public housing developed by the private sector. These findings somehow echo the invasion theory of urban change: Neighborhood changes in private housing areas will spill-over to adjacent urban areas.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Private rental housing in Hong Kong
    La Grange, A
    Pretorius, F
    HOUSING STUDIES, 2002, 17 (05) : 721 - 740
  • [2] Housing price and transaction intensity correlation in Hong Kong: implications for government housing policy
    Ling Hin Li
    Ka Shing Cheung
    Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 2017, 32 : 269 - 287
  • [3] Housing price and transaction intensity correlation in Hong Kong: implications for government housing policy
    Li, Ling Hin
    Cheung, Ka Shing
    JOURNAL OF HOUSING AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 32 (02) : 269 - 287
  • [4] Land supply and housing prices in Hong Kong: The political economy of urban land policy
    Li, Ling-Hin
    Wong, Siu Kei Kelvin
    Cheung, Ka Shing
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2016, 34 (05): : 981 - 998
  • [5] Impacts of the built environment on activity-travel behavior: Are there differences between public and private housing residents in Hong Kong?
    Wang, Donggen
    Cao, Xinyu
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 103 : 25 - 35
  • [6] The Economics of the Right to Keep a Dog A Case Study of a Private Housing Complex in Hong Kong
    Yau, Yung
    Chiu, Shuk Man
    SOCIETY & ANIMALS, 2015, 23 (04) : 343 - 362
  • [7] A hybrid simulation approach to predict cooling energy demand for public housing in Hong Kong
    Cheung, Chin To
    Mui, Kwok Wai
    Wong, Ling Tim
    BUILDING SIMULATION, 2015, 8 (06) : 603 - 611
  • [8] The spatial pattern of premature mortality in Hong Kong: How does it relate to public housing?
    Kandt, Jens
    Chang, Shu-Sen
    Yip, Paul
    Burdett, Ricky
    URBAN STUDIES, 2017, 54 (05) : 1211 - 1234
  • [9] Is insufficient land supply the root cause of housing shortage? Empirical evidence from Hong Kong
    Huang, Juan
    Shen, Geoffrey Qiping
    Zheng, Helen Wei
    HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 49 : 538 - 546
  • [10] Burst of the property bubble and Hong Kong's changing land and housing policies post-1997
    Li, Si-ming
    EURASIAN GEOGRAPHY AND ECONOMICS, 2016, 57 (02) : 228 - 248