Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy

被引:86
|
作者
Bondarenko, Igor [1 ]
Gladkov, Oleg A. [2 ]
Elsaesser, Reiner [3 ]
Buchner, Anton [3 ]
Bias, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] State Med Acad, UA-49044 Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine
[2] Chelyabinsk Reg Clin Oncol Ctr, Chelyabinsk, Russia
[3] Teva Ratiopharm, Ulm, Germany
来源
BMC CANCER | 2013年 / 13卷
关键词
Neutropenia; Febrile neutropenia; Breast cancer; Recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; Lipegfilgrastim; Pegfilgrastim; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; SINGLE-ADMINISTRATION PEGFILGRASTIM; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINE; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; DAILY FILGRASTIM; DOUBLE-BLIND; FEVER; CYCLE; PROPHYLAXIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-13-386
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Lipegfilgrastim is a novel glyco-pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in development for neutropenia prophylaxis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. This phase III, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, noninferiority trial compared the efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim in chemotherapy-naive breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with high-risk stage II, III, or IV breast cancer and an absolute neutrophil count >= 1.5 x 10(9) cells/L were randomized to a single 6-mg subcutaneous injection of lipegfilgrastim (n = 101) or pegfilgrastim (n = 101) on day 2 of each 21-day chemotherapy cycle (4 cycles maximum). The primary efficacy endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia during cycle 1. Results: Cycle 1: The mean duration of severe neutropenia for the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups was 0.7 and 0.8 days, respectively (lambda = -0.218 [95% confidence interval: -0.498%, 0.062%], p = 0.126), and no severe neutropenia was observed in 56% and 49% of patients in the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups, respectively. All cycles: In the efficacy population, febrile neutropenia occurred in three pegfilgrastim-treated patients (all in cycle 1) and zero lipegfilgrastim-treated patients. Drug-related adverse events in the safety population were reported in 28% and 26% of patients i006E the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups, respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that lipegfilgrastim 6 mg is as effective as pegfilgrastim in reducing neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A pilot study on intermittent every other days of 5-dose Filgrastim compared with single Pegfilgrastim in breast Cancer patients receiving adjuvant Docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) chemotherapy
    Sohn, Byeong Seok
    Jeong, Jae Ho
    Ahn, Jin-Hee
    Jung, Kyung Hae
    Kim, Jeong Eun
    Sohn, Joo Hyuk
    Koh, Su-Jin
    Seo, Jae Hong
    Lee, Keun Seok
    Kim, Sung-Bae
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2020, 38 (03) : 866 - 873
  • [22] A randomized, multicenter, phase II/III study to determine the optimal dose and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegteograstim (GCPGC) on chemotherapy-induced neutropenia compared to pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients: KCSG PC10-09
    Lee, Ki Hyeong
    Kim, Ji-Yeon
    Lee, Moon Hee
    Han, Hye Sook
    Lim, Joo Han
    Park, Keon Uk
    Park, In Hae
    Cho, Eun Kyung
    Yoon, So Young
    Kim, Jee Hyun
    Choi, In Sil
    Park, Jae Hoo
    Choi, Young Jin
    Kim, Hee-Jun
    Jung, Kyung Hae
    Kim, Si-Young
    Oh, Do-Youn
    Im, Seock-Ah
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (04) : 1709 - 1717
  • [23] A Phase III Randomized Equivalence Study of Biosimilar Filgrastim versus Amgen Filgrastim in Patients Receiving Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
    Waller, Cornelius F.
    Semiglazov, Vladimir F.
    Tjulandin, Sergei
    Bentsion, Dmitry
    Chan, Stephen
    Challand, Rodeina
    ONKOLOGIE, 2010, 33 (10): : 504 - 511
  • [24] A phase III, randomized, non-inferiority study comparing the efficacy and safety of biosimilar filgrastim versus originator filgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients
    Hegg, Roberto
    Mattar, Andre
    de Matos-Neto, Joao Nunes
    Pedrini, Jose Luiz
    Aleixo, Sabina Bandeira
    Rocha, Roberto Odebrecht
    Cramer-Junior, Renato Peixoto
    van-Eyll-Rocha, Sylvie
    CLINICS, 2016, 71 (10) : 586 - 592
  • [25] A randomized, double-blind, active control, multicenter, dose-finding study of lipegfilgrastim (XM22) in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive therapy
    Anton Buchner
    Reiner Elsässer
    Peter Bias
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2014, 148 : 107 - 116
  • [26] NOLAN: a randomized, phase 2 study to estimate the effect of prophylactic naproxen or loratadine vs no prophylactic treatment on bone pain in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim
    Kirshner, Jeffrey J.
    McDonald, Maxwell C., III
    Kruter, Flavio
    Guinigundo, Andrew S.
    Vanni, Linda
    Maxwell, Cathy L.
    Reiner, Maureen
    Upchurch, Terry E.
    Garcia, Jacob
    Morrow, Phuong Khanh
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2018, 26 (04) : 1323 - 1334
  • [27] Clinical confirmation to demonstrate similarity for a biosimilar pegfilgrastim: a 3-way randomized equivalence study for a proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim versus US-licensed and EU-approved reference products in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy
    Desai, Kalpna
    Misra, Priya
    Kher, Sanyukta
    Shah, Nirmesh
    EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2018, 7
  • [28] A randomized phase-III trial of docetaxel/capecitabine versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide as primary chemotherapy for patients with stage II/III breast cancer
    Lee, Keun Seok
    Ro, Jungsil
    Nam, Byung-Ho
    Lee, Eun Sook
    Kwon, Youngmee
    Kwon, Hye Soo
    Chung, Ki Wook
    Kang, Han Sung
    Kim, Eun A.
    Kim, Seok Won
    Shin, Kyung Hwan
    Kim, Seok-Ki
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2008, 109 (03) : 481 - 489
  • [29] A randomized phase-III trial of docetaxel/capecitabine versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide as primary chemotherapy for patients with stage II/III breast cancer
    Keun Seok Lee
    Jungsil Ro
    Byung-Ho Nam
    Eun Sook Lee
    Youngmee Kwon
    Hye Soo Kwon
    Ki Wook Chung
    Han Sung Kang
    Eun A Kim
    Seok Won Kim
    Kyung Hwan Shin
    Seok-Ki Kim
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2008, 109 : 481 - 489
  • [30] Efficacy of same-day versus next-day administration of pegfilgrastim for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: A retrospective multi-site analysis
    Hobbs, Jacob
    Lowe, Jan
    Ferdinand, Abigale
    Shook, Anna
    Beck, Bradley
    Blais, Danielle
    Borchardt, Cole
    Xu, Bing
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2023, 29 (08) : 1853 - 1861