Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy

被引:87
作者
Bondarenko, Igor [1 ]
Gladkov, Oleg A. [2 ]
Elsaesser, Reiner [3 ]
Buchner, Anton [3 ]
Bias, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] State Med Acad, UA-49044 Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine
[2] Chelyabinsk Reg Clin Oncol Ctr, Chelyabinsk, Russia
[3] Teva Ratiopharm, Ulm, Germany
关键词
Neutropenia; Febrile neutropenia; Breast cancer; Recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; Lipegfilgrastim; Pegfilgrastim; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; SINGLE-ADMINISTRATION PEGFILGRASTIM; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINE; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; DAILY FILGRASTIM; DOUBLE-BLIND; FEVER; CYCLE; PROPHYLAXIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-13-386
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Lipegfilgrastim is a novel glyco-pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in development for neutropenia prophylaxis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. This phase III, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, noninferiority trial compared the efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim in chemotherapy-naive breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with high-risk stage II, III, or IV breast cancer and an absolute neutrophil count >= 1.5 x 10(9) cells/L were randomized to a single 6-mg subcutaneous injection of lipegfilgrastim (n = 101) or pegfilgrastim (n = 101) on day 2 of each 21-day chemotherapy cycle (4 cycles maximum). The primary efficacy endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia during cycle 1. Results: Cycle 1: The mean duration of severe neutropenia for the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups was 0.7 and 0.8 days, respectively (lambda = -0.218 [95% confidence interval: -0.498%, 0.062%], p = 0.126), and no severe neutropenia was observed in 56% and 49% of patients in the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups, respectively. All cycles: In the efficacy population, febrile neutropenia occurred in three pegfilgrastim-treated patients (all in cycle 1) and zero lipegfilgrastim-treated patients. Drug-related adverse events in the safety population were reported in 28% and 26% of patients i006E the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups, respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that lipegfilgrastim 6 mg is as effective as pegfilgrastim in reducing neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ANN ONCOL, V14, P29
[2]  
Buchner A, 2012, SUPPORT CARE CANCER, V20, ps240
[3]   REDUCTION BY GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR OF FEVER AND NEUTROPENIA INDUCED BY CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
CRAWFORD, J ;
OZER, H ;
STOLLER, R ;
JOHNSON, D ;
LYMAN, G ;
TABBARA, I ;
KRIS, M ;
GROUS, J ;
PICOZZI, V ;
RAUSCH, G ;
SMITH, R ;
GRADISHAR, W ;
YAHANDA, A ;
VINCENT, M ;
STEWART, M ;
GLASPY, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 325 (03) :164-170
[4]  
Crawford Jeffrey, 2005, Support Cancer Ther, V3, P36, DOI 10.3816/SCT.2005.n.023
[5]   XM02 is superior to placebo and equivalent to Neupogen™ in reducing the duration of severe neutropenia and the incidence of febrile neutropenia in cycle 1 in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy [J].
del Giglio, A. ;
Eniu, A. ;
Ganea-Motan, D. ;
Topuzov, E. ;
Lubenau, H. .
BMC CANCER, 2008, 8 (1)
[6]  
European Medicines Agency, 2006, CPMPICH36396 EUR MED
[7]   Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Outpatient Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Adults Treated for Malignancy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline [J].
Flowers, Christopher R. ;
Seidenfeld, Jerome ;
Bow, Eric J. ;
Karten, Clare ;
Gleason, Charise ;
Hawley, Douglas K. ;
Kuderer, Nicole M. ;
Langston, Amelia A. ;
Marr, Kieren A. ;
Rolston, Kenneth V. I. ;
Ramsey, Scott D. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (06) :794-810
[8]   Executive Summary: Clinical Practice Guideline for the Use of Antimicrobial Agents in Neutropenic Patients with Cancer: 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America [J].
Freifeld, Alison G. ;
Bow, Eric J. ;
Sepkowitz, Kent A. ;
Boeckh, Michael J. ;
Ito, James I. ;
Mullen, Craig A. ;
Raad, Issam I. ;
Rolston, Kenneth V. ;
Young, Jo-Anne H. ;
Wingard, John R. .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 52 (04) :427-431
[9]   A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy [J].
Green, MD ;
Koelbl, H ;
Baselga, J ;
Galid, A ;
Guillem, V ;
Gascon, P ;
Siena, S ;
Lalisang, RI ;
Samonigg, H ;
Clemens, MR ;
Zani, V ;
Liang, BC ;
Renwick, J ;
Piccart, MJ .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (01) :29-35
[10]   Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer [J].
Holmes, FA ;
O'Shaughnessy, JA ;
Vukelja, S ;
Jones, SE ;
Shogan, J ;
Savin, M ;
Glaspy, J ;
Moore, M ;
Meza, L ;
Wiznitzer, I ;
Neumann, TA ;
Hill, LR ;
Liang, BC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (03) :727-731