Developing spatial biophysical accounting for multiple ecosystem services

被引:63
|
作者
Remme, Roy P. [1 ]
Schroter, Matthias [1 ]
Hein, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Environm Syst Anal Grp, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Cultural landscape; Province; Mapping; Biophysical accounting; SEEA; Ecosystem contribution; AIR-POLLUTION; LAND; POLICY; CONSEQUENCES; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; UNCERTAINTY; POLLINATION; TRADEOFFS; LANDSCAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecosystem accounting is receiving increasing interest as a way to systematically monitor the conditions of ecosystems and the ecosystem services they provide. A critical element of ecosystem accounting is understanding spatially explicit flows of ecosystem services. We developed spatial biophysical models of seven ecosystem services in a cultural landscape (Limburg province, the Netherlands) in a way that is consistent with ecosystem accounting. We included hunting, drinking water extraction, crop production, fodder production, air quality regulation, carbon sequestration and recreational cycling. In addition, we examined how human inputs can be distinguished from ecosystem services, a critical element in ecosystem accounting. Model outcomes were used to develop an ecosystem accounting table in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Experimental Ecosystem Accounting (SEER EEA) guidelines, in which contributions of land cover types to ecosystem service flows were recorded. Furthermore we developed spatial accounts for single statistical units. This study shows that for the case of Limburg spatial modelling for ecosystem accounting in line with SEEA EEA is feasible. The paper also analyses and discusses key challenges that need to be addressed to develop a well-functioning system for ecosystem accounting. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 18
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Towards ecosystem service assessment: Developing biophysical indicators for forest ecosystem services
    Tiemann, Andre
    Ring, Irene
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 137
  • [2] Lessons learned for spatial modelling of ecosystem services in support of ecosystem accounting
    Schroeter, Matthias
    Remme, Roy P.
    Sumarga, Elham
    Barton, David N.
    Hein, Lars
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 13 : 64 - 69
  • [3] Spatial complementarity of forests and farms: Accounting for ecosystem services
    Pattanayak, SK
    Butry, DT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 87 (04) : 995 - 1008
  • [4] Integration of biophysical connectivity in the spatial optimization of coastal ecosystem services
    Ospina-Alvarez, Andres
    de Juan, Silvia
    Davis, Katrina J.
    Gonzalez, Catherine
    Fernandez, Miriam
    Navarrete, Sergio A.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 733
  • [5] Biophysical and economic assessment of four ecosystem services for natural capital accounting in Italy
    Capriolo, A.
    Boschetto, R. G.
    Mascolo, R. A.
    Balbi, S.
    Villa, F.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 46
  • [6] Spatial modeling of the biophysical and economic values of ecosystem services in Maryland, USA
    Campbell, Elliott
    Marks, Rachel
    Conn, Christine
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 43
  • [7] Towards ecosystem accounting: a comprehensive approach to modelling multiple hydrological ecosystem services
    Duku, C.
    Rathjens, H.
    Zwart, S. J.
    Hein, L.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2015, 19 (10) : 4377 - 4396
  • [8] Ecosystem services of Lake Erie: Spatial distribution and concordance of multiple services
    Allan, J. David
    Manning, Nathan F.
    Smith, Sigrid D. P.
    Dickinson, Caitlin E.
    Joseph, Christine A.
    Pearsall, Douglas R.
    JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2017, 43 (04) : 678 - 688
  • [9] Accounting for the value of ecosystem services
    Howarth, RB
    Farber, S
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 41 (03) : 421 - 429
  • [10] Ecosystem Services: Accounting Standards
    Obst, Carl
    Edens, Bram
    Hein, Lars
    SCIENCE, 2013, 342 (6157) : 420 - 420