Effects of different types of instructor comments in online discussions

被引:19
|
作者
Kwon, Kyungbin [1 ]
Park, Su Jin [2 ]
Shin, Suhkyung [3 ]
Chang, Chae Young [4 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Instruct Syst Technol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Dept Literacy Culture & Language Educ, Bloomington, IN USA
[3] Univ Seoul, Educ Innovat, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Indiana Univ Northwest, Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, Gary, IN USA
关键词
Comment types; online discussion; knowledge construction; interactivity; quality discussion; CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS; COLLABORATIVE ARGUMENTATION; STUDENTS; PEER; FEEDBACK; QUALITY; CONSTRUCTION; FACILITATION; PERCEPTIONS; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1080/01587919.2019.1602469
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The current study examined the effects of different types of instructor comments on student engagement in an online discussion. In particular, this study examined three comment types: (1) praise-oriented comments, agreeing with students' initial messages and recapping their ideas, (2) elaboration-encouraging comments, requesting elaboration on the initial messages, and (3) perspective-widening comments, suggesting different or thought-provoking opinions responding to the initial messages. Seventeen graduate students enrolled in an online course were recruited. A content analysis was employed to evaluate the levels of knowledge construction. Interactivity was measured by the number of posts and idea units. The findings revealed that perspective-widening comments facilitated students' evaluation on the peer postings and brought up diverse perspectives, contributing to knowledge construction. While elaboration-encouraging comments led to high interactivity among students, praise-oriented comments had no significant effect on the frequency of interactivity.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 242
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Teaching Presence in Online Courses: Similar Perceptions but Different Experiences from Multiple Instructor Perspectives
    Turk, Murat
    Muftuoglu, Ali Ceyhun
    Toraman, Sinem
    ONLINE LEARNING, 2021, 25 (04): : 7 - 28
  • [42] Effects of learner-instructor relationship-building strategies in online video instruction
    Kim, Yanghee
    Thayne, Jeffrey
    DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2015, 36 (01) : 100 - 114
  • [43] An Exploratory Examination of Student-Led, Asynchronous Collaborative Online Discussions in Fostering Higher-Order Cognitive Skills and Ethical Leadership Learning
    McCarron, Graziella Pagliarulo
    Olesova, Larisa
    Calkins, Brianna
    ONLINE LEARNING, 2021, 25 (04): : 79 - 100
  • [44] Interculturality in Online Learning: Instructor and Student Accommodations
    Sadykova, Gulnara
    Meskill, Carla
    ONLINE LEARNING, 2019, 23 (01): : 5 - 21
  • [45] Presence and Positioning as Components of Online Instructor Persona
    Dennen, Vanessa Paz
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, 2007, 40 (01) : 95 - 108
  • [46] Investigating assessment types in an online climate change class: moderating and mediating effects
    Millet, April L.
    Dinc, Emre
    Bralower, Timothy J.
    ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 72 (06): : 3075 - 3101
  • [47] INVESTIGATING DOMINANT TYPE OF ONLINE INSTRUCTOR SCAFFOLDING
    Rabu, Siti Nazleen Abdul
    Aris, Baharuddin
    Tasir, Zaidatun
    EDULEARN16: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, : 7118 - 7127
  • [48] What Creates Interactivity in Online News Discussions? An Exploratory Analysis of Discussion Factors in User Comments on News Items
    Ziegele, Marc
    Breiner, Timo
    Quiring, Oliver
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2014, 64 (06) : 1111 - 1138
  • [49] Characteristics of asynchronous online discussions in a graduate course: an exploratory study
    Li, Xiaofeng
    Yu, Yawen
    INFORMATION AND LEARNING SCIENCES, 2020, 121 (7-8) : 599 - 609
  • [50] Analysing interactions in online discussions through social network analysis
    Ye, Dan
    Pennisi, Svoboda
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2022, 38 (03) : 784 - 796