PREDICTION OF SOLAR FLARE SIZE AND TIME-TO-FLARE USING SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE REGRESSION

被引:38
作者
Boucheron, Laura E. [1 ]
Al-Ghraibah, Amani [1 ]
McAteer, R. T. James [2 ]
机构
[1] New Mexico State Univ, Klipsch Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
[2] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Astron, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
methods: data analysis; methods: statistical; Sun: flares; Sun: magnetic fields; Sun: photosphere; MAGNETIC-FIELD PROPERTIES; QUIET ACTIVE REGIONS; PRODUCTIVITY; COMPLEXITY; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/51
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We study the prediction of solar flare size and time-to-flare using 38 features describing magnetic complexity of the photospheric magnetic field. This work uses support vector regression to formulate a mapping from the 38-dimensional feature space to a continuous-valued label vector representing flare size or time-to-flare. When we consider flaring regions only, we find an average error in estimating flare size of approximately half a geostationary operational environmental satellite (GOES) class. When we additionally consider non-flaring regions, we find an increased average error of approximately three-fourths a GOES class. We also consider thresholding the regressed flare size for the experiment containing both flaring and non-flaring regions and find a true positive rate of 0.69 and a true negative rate of 0.86 for flare prediction. The results for both of these size regression experiments are consistent across a wide range of predictive time windows, indicating that the magnetic complexity features may be persistent in appearance long before flare activity. This is supported by our larger error rates of some 40 hr in the time-to-flare regression problem. The 38 magnetic complexity features considered here appear to have discriminative potential for flare size, but their persistence in time makes them less discriminative for the time-to-flare problem.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [21] FREE MAGNETIC ENERGY AND FLARE PRODUCTIVITY OF ACTIVE REGIONS
    Jing, Ju
    Tan, Changyi
    Yuan, Yuan
    Wang, Benjamin
    Wiegelmann, Thomas
    Xu, Yan
    Wang, Haimin
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 713 (01) : 440 - 449
  • [22] Koskinen H., 2001, ESWSRMIRP0001 ESA FI
  • [23] Photospheric magnetic field properties of flaring versus flare-quiet active regions. I. Data, general approach, and sample results
    Leka, KD
    Barnes, G
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 595 (02) : 1277 - 1295
  • [24] Blind image deconvolution through support vector regression
    Li, Dalong
    Mersereau, Russell M.
    Simske, Steven
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 2007, 18 (03): : 931 - 935
  • [25] TESTING AUTOMATED SOLAR FLARE FORECASTING WITH 13 YEARS OF MICHELSON DOPPLER IMAGER MAGNETOGRAMS
    Mason, J. P.
    Hoeksema, J. T.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 723 (01) : 634 - 640
  • [26] McAteer R. T. J., 2015, SSRV, P1
  • [27] Frozen-in Fractals All Around: Inferring the Large-Scale Effects of Small-Scale Magnetic Structure
    McAteer, R. T. James
    [J]. SOLAR PHYSICS, 2015, 290 (07) : 1897 - 1907
  • [28] Turbulence, complexity, and solar flares
    McAteer, R. T. James
    Gallagher, Peter T.
    Conlon, Paul A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2010, 45 (09) : 1067 - 1074
  • [29] Statistics of active region complexity: A large-scale fractal dimension survey
    McAteer, RTJ
    Gallagher, PT
    Ireland, J
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 631 (01) : 628 - 635
  • [30] Complexity of magnetic structures: Flares and cycle phase dependence
    Meunier, N
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2004, 420 (01) : 333 - 342