How Decision Complexity Affects Outcomes in Combinatorial Auctions

被引:5
作者
Adomavicius, Gediminas [1 ]
Curley, Shawn P. [1 ]
Gupta, Alok [1 ]
Sanyal, Pallab [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, 321 19th Ave South, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Sch Business, 4400 Univ Dr, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
decision complexity; combinatorial auctions; laboratory experiments; bidder strategies; TASK COMPLEXITY; PROCUREMENT AUCTIONS; USER ACCEPTANCE; INFORMATION FEEDBACK; PERFORMANCE; HETEROGENEITY; SUPPORT; DESIGN; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/poms.13249
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Procurement mechanisms used by businesses have evolved from simple single-item auctions to complex multi-unit, multi-attribute, and multi-object auctions and their combinations. These state-of-the-art mechanisms offer many economic benefits but also introduce challenges such as the increased complexity in decision-making for the participants. Our primary goal in this study is to study how decision complexity affects the economic outcomes and acceptability of an advanced economic mechanism: the continuous combinatorial auction. We identify three aspects of complexity-auction size, competition, and the number of active bids. We examine these complexity aspects with five types of auctions conducted with a general consumer population in an experimental environment with real payoffs. We find that various aspects of complexity affect economic outcomes in different ways. Furthermore, competition is a critical factor for conducting efficient auctions. We also conduct a secondary analysis of bidder behavior through a granular examination of clickstream data collected during the auctions. We find that decision complexity influences bidder strategies leading to differences in auction outcomes. Based on our analysis, we develop valuable insights for auction practitioners.
引用
收藏
页码:2579 / 2600
页数:22
相关论文
共 55 条
[41]   Combinatorial auction design [J].
Porter, D ;
Rassenti, S ;
Roopnarine, A ;
Smith, V .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (19) :11153-11157
[42]   Computationally manageable combinational auctions [J].
Rothkopf, MH ;
Pekec, A ;
Harstad, RM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (08) :1131-1147
[43]   The challenge of complexity for cognitive systems [J].
Schmid, Ute ;
Ragni, Marco ;
Gonzalez, Cleotilde ;
Funke, Joachim .
COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2011, 12 (3-4) :211-218
[44]   The use of bundling in B2B online reverse auctions [J].
Schoenherr, Tobias ;
Mabert, Vincent A. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2008, 26 (01) :81-95
[45]  
Schroder H.M., 1971, Personality theory and information processing
[46]   Procurement Auctions for Differentiated Goods [J].
Shachat, Jason ;
Swarthout, J. Todd .
DECISION ANALYSIS, 2010, 7 (01) :6-22
[47]   A Multiattribute Sealed-Bid Procurement Auction with Multiple Budgets for Government Vendor Selection [J].
Simon, Jay ;
Melese, Francois .
DECISION ANALYSIS, 2011, 8 (03) :170-179
[48]   Complexity as a Guide to Understanding Decision Bias: A Contribution to the Favorite-Longshot Bias Debate [J].
Sung, Ming-Chien ;
Johnson, Johnnie Eric Victor ;
Dror, Itiel E. .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2009, 22 (03) :318-337
[49]   THE FRAMING OF DECISIONS AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CHOICE [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4481) :453-458
[50]   Effects of Concurrent Monitoring on Cognitive Load and Performance as a Function of Task Complexity [J].
Van Gog, Tamara ;
Kester, Liesbeth ;
Paas, Fred .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 25 (04) :584-587