Considerations on the Environmental and Social Sustainability of Animal-Based Policies

被引:8
作者
Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano [1 ]
Lamonaca, Emilia [1 ]
Tappi, Marco [1 ]
Di Gioia, Leonardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Foggia, Dept Sci Agr Food & Environm, Via Napoli 25, I-71121 Foggia, Italy
来源
SUSTAINABILITY | 2019年 / 11卷 / 08期
关键词
animal welfare; GHG emission; EU policy; livestock; rural development; sustainability; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; AGRICULTURAL POLICY; LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS; GHG EMISSIONS; TRADE-OFF; LAND-USE; EFFICIENCY; EXPANSION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.3390/su11082316
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The contribution of the livestock sector to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as the worsening of animal welfare, with the intensification of production methods, have become increasingly relevant. Our contribution investigates the environmental impacts, in terms of methane and nitrous oxide emissions, of animal-based policies supported by the European Union. We examine factors affecting the adoption and the magnitude of related budget of Measure 215animal welfareof Rural Development Programmes 2007-2013. Our focus is cattle farming in Italy. The results highlight that the problem of animal welfare is highly perceived in regions with greater livestock intensity, also where GHG emissions are relevant. Given the adoption of measure 215, more budget tends to be allocated in regions where livestock units are particularly high. In addition, from the analysis emerges the bargaining position of regions with a higher propensity to the agricultural sector.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Animal-Based Measures for the On-Farm Welfare Assessment of Geese
    Tremolada, Carlo
    Bielinska, Halina
    Minero, Michela
    Ferrante, Valentina
    Canali, Elisabetta
    Barbieri, Sara
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (05):
  • [32] Animal-Based Measures to Assess the Welfare of Extensively Managed Ewes
    Munoz, Carolina
    Campbell, Angus
    Hemsworth, Paul
    Doyle, Rebecca
    ANIMALS, 2018, 8 (01):
  • [33] Environmental and social life cycle assessment to enhance sustainability of sugarcane-based products in Thailand
    Jittima Prasara-A
    Shabbir H. Gheewala
    Thapat Silalertruksa
    Patcharaporn Pongpat
    Wanchat Sawaengsak
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2019, 21 : 1447 - 1458
  • [34] Sustainability considerations of biodiesel based on supply chain analysis
    Mata, Teresa M.
    Martins, Antonio A.
    Sikdar, Subhas K.
    Costa, Carlos A. V.
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2011, 13 (05) : 655 - 671
  • [35] Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Molasses-based Bioethanol Fuel in Pakistan
    Ghani, Hafiz Usman
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 27 : 402 - 410
  • [36] Application of the Welfare Quality® animal welfare assessment system in Finnish pig production, part II: Associations between animal-based and environmental measures of welfare
    Munsterhjelm, C.
    Heinonen, M.
    Valros, A.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2015, 24 (02) : 161 - 172
  • [37] CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE SUSTAINABILITY
    Safta, Adela Sorinela
    Popescu, Lavinia
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2024, 23 (03): : 599 - 605
  • [38] Motivations for environmental and social consciousness: Reevaluating the sustainability-based view
    Brockhaus, Sebastian
    Fawcett, Stanley E.
    Knemeyer, A. Michael
    Fawcett, Amydee M.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 : 933 - 947
  • [39] Political and Social Foundations for Environmental Sustainability
    Whitford, Andrew B.
    Wong, Karen
    POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2009, 62 (01) : 190 - 204
  • [40] The Use of the General Animal-Based Measures Codified Terms in the Scientific Literature on Farm Animal Welfare
    Brscic, Marta
    Contiero, Barbara
    Magrin, Luisa
    Riuzzi, Giorgia
    Gottardo, Flaviana
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8