Different motor learning effects on excitability changes of motor cortex in muscle contraction state

被引:4
|
作者
Sugawara, Kenichi [1 ]
Tanabe, Shigeo [2 ]
Suzuki, Tomotaka [1 ]
Higashi, Toshio [3 ]
机构
[1] Kanagawa Univ Human Serv, Fac Hlth & Social Work, Div Phys Therapy, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] Fujita Hlth Univ, Fac Rehabil, Sch Hlth Sci, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
[3] Nagasaki Univ, Grad Sch Hlth Sci, Div Phys Therapy & Occupat Therapy Sci, Nagasaki 852, Japan
关键词
Motor cortex (M1); motor evoked potential (MEP); motor skill learning; transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); DORSAL INTEROSSEOUS MUSCLE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; PLASTICITY; MODULATION; RESPONSES; HUMANS;
D O I
10.3109/08990220.2013.779244
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We aimed to investigate whether motor learning induces different excitability changes in the human motor cortex (M1) between two different muscle contraction states (before voluntary contraction [static] or during voluntary contraction [dynamic]). For the same, using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we compared excitability changes during these two states after pinch-grip motor skill learning. The participants performed a force output tracking task by pinch grip on a computer screen. TMS was applied prior to the pinch grip (static) and after initiation of voluntary contraction (dynamic). MEPs of the following muscles were recorded: first dorsal interosseous (FDI), thenar muscle (Thenar), flexor carpi radialis (FCR), and extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscles. During both the states, motor skill training led to significant improvement of motor performance. During the static state, MEPs of the FDI muscle were significantly facilitated after motor learning; however, during the dynamic state, MEPs of the FDI, Thenar, and FCR muscles were significantly decreased. Based on the results of this study, we concluded that excitability changes in the human M1 are differentially influenced during different voluntary contraction states (static and dynamic) after motor learning.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 139
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Motor Cortex Excitability in Acute Cerebellar Infarct
    Huynh, William
    Krishnan, Arun V.
    Vucic, Steve
    Lin, Cindy S-Y.
    Kiernan, Matthew C.
    CEREBELLUM, 2013, 12 (06) : 826 - 834
  • [42] Motor Cortex Excitability in Acute Cerebellar Infarct
    William Huynh
    Arun V. Krishnan
    Steve Vucic
    Cindy S-Y. Lin
    Matthew C. Kiernan
    The Cerebellum, 2013, 12 : 826 - 834
  • [43] Imagined paralysis reduces motor cortex excitability
    Hartmann, Matthias
    Falconer, Caroline J.
    Kaelin-Lang, Alain
    Mueri, Rene M.
    Mast, Fred W.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 59 (10)
  • [44] The effect of acupuncture on motor cortex excitability and plasticity
    Lo, YL
    Cui, SL
    Fook-Chong, S
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2005, 384 (1-2) : 145 - 149
  • [45] Suppression of ipsilateral motor cortex facilitates motor skill learning
    Kobayashi, Masahito
    Theoret, Hugo
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (04) : 833 - 836
  • [46] Effect of pain and pain expectation on primary motor cortex excitability
    Dube, Joelle A.
    Mercier, Catherine
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 122 (11) : 2318 - 2323
  • [47] THE AUDITORY-EVOKED AROUSAL MODULATES MOTOR CORTEX EXCITABILITY
    Lofberg, O.
    Julkunen, P.
    Paakkonen, A.
    Karhu, J.
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 274 : 403 - 408
  • [48] Comparison of different baseline conditions in evaluating factors that influence motor cortex excitability
    Labruna, Ludovica
    Fernandez-del-Olmo, Miguel
    Ivry, Richard B.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2011, 4 (03) : 152 - 155
  • [49] Primary motor cortex disinhibition during motor skill learning
    Coxon, James P.
    Peat, Nicola M.
    Byblow, Winston D.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 112 (01) : 156 - 164
  • [50] Effects of cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation on motor cortex excitability and motor function
    Antonino Naro
    Alessia Bramanti
    Antonino Leo
    Alfredo Manuli
    Francesca Sciarrone
    Margherita Russo
    Placido Bramanti
    Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
    Brain Structure and Function, 2017, 222 : 2891 - 2906