Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for ureteral calculi

被引:42
作者
Feyaerts, A [1 ]
Rietbergen, J [1 ]
Navarra, S [1 ]
Vallancien, G [1 ]
Guillonneau, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 06, Dept Urol, Inst Mutualiste Montsouris, F-75674 Paris, France
关键词
ureteric stone; laparoscopy;
D O I
10.1159/000049845
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: Most patients with ureteral calculi that do not pass spontaneously can be treated by either extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or ureteroscopy. In rare cases of large, hard and chronically impacted stones, or after failure of first-line treatments, surgical ureterolithotomy is still indicated. Laparoscopy allows performing this procedure in a minimally invasive manner. Patients and Methods: Twenty-four patients (22 men and 2 women) underwent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy between 1994 and 1999. The procedure was indicated in 10 cases as a salvage treatment after failure of SWL (6 patients), ureteroscopy (2 patients), both (1 patient), laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (1 patient), or even open ureterolithotomy (11 patient), and in 14 patients as a primary treatment for large stones (median size 11.5, range 8-33 mm). The first 3 procedures were carried out via the retroperitoneal route and the following 21 via the transperitoneal approach. Results: All but 1 stone were successfully removed in a mean operating time of 111 (range 45180) min. Postoperative pain was managed with first-line analgesics. Hospital stay ranged from 2 to 10 (mean 3.8) days. The 2 postoperative complications encountered were prolonged ileus (1 patient) and venous thrombosis (1 patient). Conclusions: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is a safe and effective procedure that enables the urologist to maintain a minimally invasive strategy when first-line treatment have failed or are unlikely to be effective. Copyright I-D 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 613
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE TECHNIQUE OF LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY
    BELLMAN, GC
    SMITH, AD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (01) : 146 - 149
  • [2] COHEN JD, 1983, UROL CLIN N AM, V10, P699
  • [3] LAPAROSCOPIC OPERATIVE RETROPERITONEOSCOPY - USE OF A NEW DEVICE
    GAUR, DD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (04) : 1137 - 1139
  • [4] LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY - THE RESULTS OF AN INITIAL SERIES, AND AN EVALUATION OF ITS ROLE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF URETERAL CALCULI
    HAREWOOD, LM
    WEBB, DR
    POPE, AJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 74 (02): : 170 - 176
  • [5] HENKEL TO, 1995, ANN UROL, V29, P61
  • [6] Keeley FX, 1999, BJU INT, V84, P765
  • [7] The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi
    Micali, S
    Moore, RG
    Averch, TD
    Adams, JB
    Kavoussi, LR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (02) : 463 - 466
  • [8] Nualyong Chaiyong, 1999, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V82, P1028
  • [9] LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY
    RABOY, A
    FERZLI, GS
    IOFFREDA, R
    ALBERT, PS
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1992, 39 (03) : 223 - 225
  • [10] Ureteral stones clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi
    Segura, JW
    Preminger, GM
    Assimos, DG
    Dretler, SP
    Kahn, RI
    Lingeman, JE
    Macaluso, JN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (05) : 1915 - 1921