Optimized Thrust Allocation of Variable-pitch Propellers Quadrotor Control: A Comparative Study on Flip Maneuver

被引:0
作者
Nekoo, S. R. [1 ]
Acosta, J. A. [1 ]
Gomez-Tamm, A. E. [1 ]
Ollero, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn, Dept Ingn Sistemas & Automat, GRVC Robot Lab, Seville, Spain
来源
2019 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON RESEARCH, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (RED UAS 2019) | 2019年
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
SDRE; thrust allocation; optimization; variable-pitch; null-space; optimal control; flip maneuver; CONTROL DESIGN; HELICOPTER;
D O I
10.1109/reduas47371.2019.8999681
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Variable-pitch propellers quadrotors possess nonlinear algebraic relations between force/moment of the system and thrust factors of the rotor dynamics. The nonlinear relations make the thrust allocation a challenging topic in overall control design. The state-dependent Riccati equation (SDRE) is selected as a controller for regulation task in fully coupled six degree-of-freedom (DoF) mode. Common designs of the SDRE fail to deliver a fully coupled six-DoF control due to under-actuation. Virtual constraints are used to deliver a position and orientation control in a cascade design. Within the structure of the SDRE, four thrust allocation methods are proposed to compute the thrust factors based on the output results of control system. Practical implementation has been the main reason to generate such allocations. The use of Mean Value Theorem makes it possible to find an implementable formalism for thrust factors since they can be categorized as non-affine systems. Agile and aggressive maneuver is one of the application of the variable-pitch propellers quadrotors; so, flip maneuver is studied to highlight the advantages of the thrust allocation methods. Analysis of the four methods and comparisons are carried out to present the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed structures.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 95
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, FUNDAMENTALS ROBOTIC
[2]   Robust optimal motion planning approach to cooperative grasping and transporting using multiple UAVs based on SDRE [J].
Babaie, Raziyeh ;
Ehyaie, Amir Farhad .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL, 2017, 39 (09) :1391-1408
[3]   Robust nonlinear control of a variable-pitch quadrotor with the flip maneuver [J].
Bhargavapuri, Mahathi ;
Sahoo, Soumya Ranjan ;
Kothari, Mangal ;
Abhishek .
CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2019, 87 :26-42
[4]   Inner-Outer Loop Control for Quadrotor UAVs With Input and State Constraints [J].
Cao, Ning ;
Lynch, Alan F. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 24 (05) :1797-1804
[5]  
Cutler M., 2011, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, P6406
[6]   Dynamic inversion with zero-dynamics stabilisation for quadrotor control [J].
Das, A. ;
Subbarao, K. ;
Lewis, F. .
IET CONTROL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, 3 (03) :303-314
[7]  
Garus J., 2004, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, V14, P461
[8]   Finite-time state-dependent Riccati equation for time-varying nonaffine systems: Rigid and flexible joint manipulator control [J].
Korayem, M. H. ;
Nekoo, S. R. .
ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2015, 54 :125-144
[9]   Fuel-efficient rudder and propeller control allocation for marine craft: Experiments with a model ship [J].
Lindegaard, KP ;
Fossen, TI .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 11 (06) :850-862
[10]  
Luukkonen T, 2011, Independent research project in applied mathematics, Espoo, V22