Is the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale a Valid Tool for Assessing Pain Intensity in Children Below 8 Years of Age?

被引:51
作者
Castarlenas, Elena [1 ]
Miro, Jordi [1 ]
Sanchez-Rodriguez, Elisabet [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Unit Study & Treatment Pain ALGOS, Ctr Recerca Avaluacio & Mesura Conducta, Inst Invest Sanitaria Pere Virgili, Tarragona 43007, Spain
关键词
Children; pain intensity; assessment; verbal numerical rating scale; self-report; FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY INVENTORY; PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; CLINICAL-TRIALS; NEEDLE PAIN; UNPLEASANTNESS; ADOLESCENTS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpain.2012.12.004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The verbal numerical rating scale (vNRS-11) is one of the most widely used scales for assessing pediatric pain intensity. The literature shows that it is a valid instrument for assessing pain intensity in children above 8 years of age. The aim of this work was to study whether the vNRS-11 is also a valid instrument when it is used with Catalan-speaking children between 6 and 8 years old. A total of 126 schoolchildren (mean age, 6.87; SD,.68) were interviewed individually. Participants reported the maximum intensity of the most frequent pain they had experienced in the previous 3 months, and the intensity they would experience in 3 circumstances, using the vNRS-11 and other widely used scales: the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R), the mechanical visual analog scale (VAS), and the colored analog scale (CAS). They rated their affective state in relation to the pain experience and reported their pain-related disability. Participants also indicated which of the 4 scales they preferred. The vNRS-11 showed a high convergent construct validity (r =.73.86), adequate discriminant validity (z = 2.05-5.55), and adequate criterion-related validity (r =.45.70). The vNRS-11 was the second most preferred scale. Perspective: This study contributes to the increasing literature that supports the use of the vNRS-11 to assess pain intensity in children. Specifically, it shows that it can be used in children as young as 6 years of age. (C) 2013 by the American Pain Society
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 304
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, HLTH MEASUREMENT SCA, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199231881.001.0001
  • [2] Comparison of four pain scales in children with acute abdominal pain in a pediatric emergency department
    Bailey, Benoit
    Bergeron, Sylvie
    Gravel, Jocelyn
    Daoust, Raoul
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 50 (04) : 379 - 383
  • [3] Validation and properties of the verbal numeric scale in children with acute pain
    Bailey, Benoit
    Daoust, Raoul
    Doyon-Trottier, Evelyne
    Dauphin-Pierre, Sabine
    Gravel, Jocelyn
    [J]. PAIN, 2010, 149 (02) : 216 - 221
  • [4] PRESCHOOLERS ABILITY TO DIFFERENTIATE LEVELS OF PAIN - RELATIVE EFFICACY OF 3 SELF-REPORT MEASURES
    BELTER, RW
    MCINTOSH, JA
    FINCH, AJ
    SAYLOR, CF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 17 (04): : 329 - 335
  • [5] Besenski L.J., 2007, PEDIAT PAIN LETT, V9, P1
  • [6] Functional assessment of pediatric pain patients: Psychometric properties of the Functional Disability Inventory
    Claar, RL
    Walker, LS
    [J]. PAIN, 2006, 121 (1-2) : 77 - 84
  • [7] Comparative Prospective Evaluation of the Responsiveness of Single-Item Pediatric Pain-Intensity Self-Report Scales and Their Uniqueness From Negative Affect in a Hospital Setting
    Connelly, Mark
    Neville, Kathleen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2010, 11 (12) : 1451 - 1460
  • [8] The verbal numeric rating scale in the pediatric emergency department: What do the numbers really mean?
    Connelly, Mark
    [J]. PAIN, 2010, 149 (02) : 167 - 168
  • [9] Prognosis of non-specific musculoskeletal pain in preadolescents: A prospective 4-year follow-up study till adolescence
    El-Metwally, A
    Salminen, JJ
    Auvinen, A
    Kautiainen, H
    Mikkelsson, M
    [J]. PAIN, 2004, 110 (03) : 550 - 559
  • [10] Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses
    Faul, Franz
    Erdfelder, Edgar
    Buchner, Axel
    Lang, Albert-Georg
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) : 1149 - 1160