Motor unit number in a small facial muscle, dilator naris

被引:4
|
作者
Patel-Khurana, Nilam [1 ]
Fregosi, Ralph F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Physiol, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
关键词
EMG; Facial nerve; Motor units; MUNE; Nasal muscles; UPPER AIRWAY MUSCLE; NERVE FUNCTION; NASAL VALVE; EXERCISE; FLOW; EMG; MECHANISMS; RESISTANCE; NOSE;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-015-4359-9
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
A loss of functioning motor units underlies many neuromuscular disorders. The facial nerve innervates the muscles of facial expression, including nasal muscles, which also play an important role in the regulation of airflow resistance. It is difficult to accurately assess motor unit number in the facial muscles, because the muscles are difficult to activate in isolation. Here, we apply the manual McComas method to estimate the number of motor units in a nasal dilator muscle. EMG of the dilator naris was recorded during graded stimulation of the zygomatic branch of the facial nerve in 26 subjects (12 males and 14 females), aged 20-41 years. Each subject was studied twice, on separate days, to estimate method reproducibility. As a check on our use of the McComas method, we also estimated motor unit number in the first dorsal interosseus muscle (FDI) of six subjects, as the muscle is also small and has been studied with the McComas method. Reproducibility was evaluated with a rigorous statistical approach, the Bland-Altman procedure. We estimate that dilator naris is composed of 75 +/- A 15.6 (SD) motor units, compared to 144 +/- A 35.5 in FDI. The coefficient of variation for test-retest reproducibility of dilator naris motor unit estimates was 29.6 %, similar to separate-day reproducibility reported for other muscles. Recording and stimulation were done with surface electrodes, and the recordings were of high quality and reproducible. This simple technique could be applied clinically to track motor neuron loss and to monitor facial nerve integrity.
引用
收藏
页码:2897 / 2902
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MScanFit motor unit number estimation and muscle velocity recovery cycle recordings in diabetic polyneuropathy
    Kristensen, A. G.
    Khan, K. S.
    Bostock, H.
    Khan, B. S.
    Gylfadottir, S.
    Andersen, H.
    Finnerup, N. B.
    Jensen, T. S.
    Tankisi, H.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 131 (11) : 2591 - 2599
  • [22] ESTIMATING THE NUMBER OF MOTOR UNITS IN A MUSCLE
    DAUBE, JR
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 12 (06) : 585 - 594
  • [23] Updating motor unit number estimation (MUNE)
    Bromberg, Mark B.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 118 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [24] Motor unit number estimates - From A to Z
    Daube, JR
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2006, 242 (1-2) : 23 - 35
  • [25] Motor unit number index (MUNIX) versus motor unit number estimation (MUNE): A direct comparison in a longitudinal study of ALS patients
    Boekestein, Werner A.
    Schelhaas, Helenius J.
    van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
    Stegeman, Dick F.
    Zwarts, Machiel J.
    van Dijk, Johannes P.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 123 (08) : 1644 - 1649
  • [26] Cremaster muscle motor unit action potentials
    Ozdemirkiran, Tolga
    Ertekin, Cumhur
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 122 (08) : 1679 - 1685
  • [27] MOTOR UNIT RECRUITMENT AND THE GRADATION OF MUSCLE FORCE
    CLAMANN, HP
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1993, 73 (12): : 830 - 843
  • [28] Motor unit number estimation by MScanFit in myotonic dystrophies
    Schneider, Christian
    Svacina, Martin K. R.
    Kohle, Felix
    Sprenger-Svacina, Alina
    Fink, Gereon R.
    Lehmann, Helmar C.
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 451
  • [29] Motor unit number estimation in transected peripheral nerves
    Oge, A. E.
    Kocasoy-Orhan, E.
    Yayla, V.
    Basaran, K.
    Guven, E.
    Baslo, M. B.
    Emekli, U.
    NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 32 (10) : 1072 - 1076
  • [30] Anconeus motor unit number estimates using decomposition-based quantitative electromyography
    Stevens, Daniel E. S.
    Harwood, Brad
    Power, Geoffrey A.
    Doherty, Timothy J.
    Rice, Charles L.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2014, 50 (01) : 52 - 59