Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Is Superior to the Laparoscopic Technique

被引:266
|
作者
Daouadi, Mustapha [1 ]
Zureikat, Amer H. [1 ]
Zenati, Mazen S.
Choudry, Haroon [1 ]
Tsung, Alan
Bartlett, David L. [1 ]
Hughes, Steven J. [2 ]
Lee, Ken K. [1 ]
Moser, A. James [1 ]
Zeh, Herbert J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div GI Surg Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Surg, Div Gen Surg, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy; minimally-invasive surgery; operative time; robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy; retrospective study; ADENOCARCINOMA; SURGERY; EVOLUTION; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825fff08
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) reduces postoperative morbidity, hospital stay, and recovery as compared with open distal pancreatectomy. Technical limitations of laparoscopic surgery may limit patient eligibility and require conversion to open or hand-assisted surgery to maintain patient safety. We hypothesized that robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RADP) was superior to LDP as a result of improved surgical manipulation and visualization, potentially expanding the indications for minimally invasive pancreatectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between January 2004 and February 2011. We compared the perioperative outcomes, 90-day morbidity and mortality of our first 30 RADPs to 94 consecutive historical control LDPs. Results: Patients undergoing RADP and LDP demonstrated equivalent age, sex, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists' score, and tumor size. Postoperative length of hospital stay and rates of pancreatic fistula, blood transfusion, and readmission were not statistically different. Patients in the RADP group did not require conversion to open surgery unlike the LDP group (16%, P < 0.05) and had reduced risk of excessive blood loss. There were more pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas approached robotically (43%) than laparoscopically (15%) (P < 0.05). Oncological outcomes in these cases were superior for the robotic-assisted group with higher rates of margin negative resection and improved lymph node yield for both benign and malignant lesions (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: RADPs were equivalent to LDPs in nearly all measures of outcome and safety but significantly reduced the risk of conversion to open resection, despite a statistically greater probability of malignancy in the robotic cohort. We concluded that robotic assistance may broaden indications for minimally invasive pancreatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy improves spleen preservation rate versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas
    Jiang, Yabo
    Zheng, Kailian
    Zhang, Shichao
    Shao, Zhuo
    Cheng, Peng
    Zhang, Yijie
    Jin, Gang
    He, Tianlin
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (09) : 5166 - 5172
  • [42] Optimal Placement of a Superior Vena Cava Cannula in Minimally Invasive Robot-Assisted Cardiac Surgery
    Lee, Yoon Kyung
    Sim, Ji Yeon
    Seo, Jung Wook
    Choi, In Cheol
    Hahm, Kyung Don
    Choi, Jae Woong
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2010, 74 (02) : 284 - 288
  • [43] Initial Experience with Robot-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
    Partelli, S.
    Cirocchi, R.
    Crippa, S.
    Desiderio, J.
    Belfiori, G.
    Parisi, A.
    Falconi, M.
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 102 (1-2) : 143 - 144
  • [44] Endoscopic Drainage of Postoperative Collection After Robot-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy
    Chong, Charing Ching Ning
    Teoh, Anthony Yuen Bun
    Lau, James Yun Wong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 (07): : 965 - 965
  • [45] Technique of left robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy
    Bagga, Herman S.
    Levinson, Adam
    Hernandez, David J.
    Piacitelli, Jeffrey
    Su, Li-Ming
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 711 - 712
  • [46] Technique of left robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy
    Roberts, Wilmer B.
    deAlmeida e Paula, Felipe
    Lepper, Fabio
    Su, Li-Ming
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 158 - 158
  • [47] ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY: SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
    Rocco, B.
    Coelho, R. F.
    Albo, G.
    Patel, V. R.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2010, 62 (03) : 295 - 304
  • [48] Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy: Description of technique
    Passerotti, Carlo C.
    Diamond, David A.
    Borer, Joseph G.
    Eisner, Brian H.
    Barrisford, Glen
    Nguyen, Hiep T.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (04) : 581 - 584
  • [49] TECHNIQUE OF ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC CALYCEAL DIVERTICULECTOMY
    Yamamoto, Akira
    Evans, Blake
    Nelson, Christopher
    Su, Li Ming
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A507 - A508
  • [50] TARUP technique. Advantages of minimally invasive robot-assisted abdominal Wall surgery
    Rodrigues, Victor
    Lopez-Cano, Manuel
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2021, 99 (04): : 302 - 305