Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Is Superior to the Laparoscopic Technique

被引:266
|
作者
Daouadi, Mustapha [1 ]
Zureikat, Amer H. [1 ]
Zenati, Mazen S.
Choudry, Haroon [1 ]
Tsung, Alan
Bartlett, David L. [1 ]
Hughes, Steven J. [2 ]
Lee, Ken K. [1 ]
Moser, A. James [1 ]
Zeh, Herbert J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div GI Surg Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Surg, Div Gen Surg, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy; minimally-invasive surgery; operative time; robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy; retrospective study; ADENOCARCINOMA; SURGERY; EVOLUTION; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825fff08
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) reduces postoperative morbidity, hospital stay, and recovery as compared with open distal pancreatectomy. Technical limitations of laparoscopic surgery may limit patient eligibility and require conversion to open or hand-assisted surgery to maintain patient safety. We hypothesized that robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RADP) was superior to LDP as a result of improved surgical manipulation and visualization, potentially expanding the indications for minimally invasive pancreatectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between January 2004 and February 2011. We compared the perioperative outcomes, 90-day morbidity and mortality of our first 30 RADPs to 94 consecutive historical control LDPs. Results: Patients undergoing RADP and LDP demonstrated equivalent age, sex, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists' score, and tumor size. Postoperative length of hospital stay and rates of pancreatic fistula, blood transfusion, and readmission were not statistically different. Patients in the RADP group did not require conversion to open surgery unlike the LDP group (16%, P < 0.05) and had reduced risk of excessive blood loss. There were more pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas approached robotically (43%) than laparoscopically (15%) (P < 0.05). Oncological outcomes in these cases were superior for the robotic-assisted group with higher rates of margin negative resection and improved lymph node yield for both benign and malignant lesions (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: RADPs were equivalent to LDPs in nearly all measures of outcome and safety but significantly reduced the risk of conversion to open resection, despite a statistically greater probability of malignancy in the robotic cohort. We concluded that robotic assistance may broaden indications for minimally invasive pancreatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Novel robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical technique for the treatment of esophageal cancer
    Wilkojc, Michal
    Migal, Wojciech
    Majewska, Agnieszka
    Rozanska-Waledziak, Anna
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2024, 19 (04) : 506 - 510
  • [32] Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Weksler, B.
    Sharma, P.
    Moudgill, N.
    Chojnacki, K. A.
    Rosato, E. L.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2012, 25 (05) : 403 - 409
  • [33] Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes comparing robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
    Hu, Yong-hao
    Qin, Ya-fei
    Yu, Ding-ding
    Li, Xiang
    Zhao, Yi-ming
    Kong, De-jun
    Jin, Wang
    Wang, Hao
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (03) : 201 - 218
  • [34] Oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Analysis of the National Cancer Database
    Raoof, Mustafa
    Nota, Carolijn L. M. A.
    Melstrom, Laleh G.
    Warner, Susanne G.
    Woo, Yanghee
    Singh, Gagandeep
    Fong, Yuman
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 118 (04) : 651 - 656
  • [35] Comparison of Standard Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy with Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Using the da Vinci S System
    Ito, Masahiro
    Asano, Yukio
    Shimizu, Tomohiro
    Uyama, Ichiro
    Horiguchi, Akihiko
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 61 (130) : 493 - 496
  • [36] Totally minimally invasive laparoscopic robot-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: improved technique and outcomes over 200 cases
    Drake, Justin A.
    Sinnamon, Andrew J.
    Saeed, Samir
    Mehta, Rutika
    Palm, Russell F.
    Baldonado, Jobelle J.
    Fontaine, Jacques P.
    Pimiento, Jose M.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 15 (02) : 544 - +
  • [37] THE PERITONEAL "WINDOW" TECHNIQUE DURING A ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. MINIMIZING A MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH.
    Tyritzis, S., I
    Wiklund, P.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 : 98 - 99
  • [38] ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC EXCISION OF DISTAL URETERAL REMNANTS
    Yates, J.
    Hinds, P.
    Stock, J.
    Kim, M.
    Uberoi, J.
    Munver, R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A361 - A361
  • [39] Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery
    Okamura, Allison M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2009, 19 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [40] Initial experience with robot-assisted minimally invasive nephroureterectomy
    Hu, Jim C.
    Silletti, Joseph P.
    Williams, Stephen B.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (04) : 699 - 704