Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Is Superior to the Laparoscopic Technique

被引:266
|
作者
Daouadi, Mustapha [1 ]
Zureikat, Amer H. [1 ]
Zenati, Mazen S.
Choudry, Haroon [1 ]
Tsung, Alan
Bartlett, David L. [1 ]
Hughes, Steven J. [2 ]
Lee, Ken K. [1 ]
Moser, A. James [1 ]
Zeh, Herbert J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div GI Surg Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Surg, Div Gen Surg, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy; minimally-invasive surgery; operative time; robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy; retrospective study; ADENOCARCINOMA; SURGERY; EVOLUTION; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825fff08
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) reduces postoperative morbidity, hospital stay, and recovery as compared with open distal pancreatectomy. Technical limitations of laparoscopic surgery may limit patient eligibility and require conversion to open or hand-assisted surgery to maintain patient safety. We hypothesized that robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RADP) was superior to LDP as a result of improved surgical manipulation and visualization, potentially expanding the indications for minimally invasive pancreatectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between January 2004 and February 2011. We compared the perioperative outcomes, 90-day morbidity and mortality of our first 30 RADPs to 94 consecutive historical control LDPs. Results: Patients undergoing RADP and LDP demonstrated equivalent age, sex, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists' score, and tumor size. Postoperative length of hospital stay and rates of pancreatic fistula, blood transfusion, and readmission were not statistically different. Patients in the RADP group did not require conversion to open surgery unlike the LDP group (16%, P < 0.05) and had reduced risk of excessive blood loss. There were more pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas approached robotically (43%) than laparoscopically (15%) (P < 0.05). Oncological outcomes in these cases were superior for the robotic-assisted group with higher rates of margin negative resection and improved lymph node yield for both benign and malignant lesions (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: RADPs were equivalent to LDPs in nearly all measures of outcome and safety but significantly reduced the risk of conversion to open resection, despite a statistically greater probability of malignancy in the robotic cohort. We concluded that robotic assistance may broaden indications for minimally invasive pancreatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Efficacy of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single-Center Comparative Study
    Chen, Peng
    Zhou, Bin
    Wang, Tao
    Hu, Xiao
    Ye, Yongqiang
    Guo, Weidong
    Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2022, 2022
  • [22] Minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robot-assisted) approach for solid pseudopapillary tumor of the distal pancreas: a single-center experience
    Kang, Chang Moo
    Choi, Sung Hoon
    Hwang, Ho Kyoung
    Lee, Woo Jung
    Chi, Hoon Sang
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2011, 18 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [23] Laparoscopic robot-assisted distal splenorenal shunt
    Boggi, Ugo
    Belluomini, Mario Antonio
    Barbarello, Linda
    Caniglia, Fabio
    Brunetto, Maurizia
    Amorese, Gabriella
    SURGERY, 2015, 157 (02) : 405 - 405
  • [24] Robot-assisted minimally invasive lung brachytherapy
    Trejos, A. L.
    Lin, A. W.
    Pytel, M. P.
    Patel, R. V.
    Malthaner, R. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2007, 3 (01): : 41 - 51
  • [25] Haptics for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Okamura, A. M.
    Verner, L. N.
    Reiley, C. E.
    Mahvash, M.
    ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 2010, 66 : 361 - 372
  • [26] Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Distal Ureteral Surgery
    Schimpf, Megan O.
    Wagner, Joseph R.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2009, 13 (01) : 44 - 49
  • [27] Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a case-matched cost-analysis between robot-assisted surgery and direct manual laparoscopy
    Di Franco, Gregorio
    Peri, Andrea
    Lorenzoni, Valentina
    Palmeri, Matteo
    Furbetta, Niccolo
    Guadagni, Simone
    Gianardi, Desiree
    Bianchini, Matteo
    Pollina, Luca Emanuele
    Melfi, Franca
    Mamone, Domenica
    Milli, Carlo
    Di Candio, Giulio
    Turchetti, Giuseppe
    Pietrabissa, Andrea
    Morelli, Luca
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (01): : 651 - 662
  • [28] Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a case-matched cost-analysis between robot-assisted surgery and direct manual laparoscopy
    Gregorio Di Franco
    Andrea Peri
    Valentina Lorenzoni
    Matteo Palmeri
    Niccolò Furbetta
    Simone Guadagni
    Desirée Gianardi
    Matteo Bianchini
    Luca Emanuele Pollina
    Franca Melfi
    Domenica Mamone
    Carlo Milli
    Giulio Di Candio
    Giuseppe Turchetti
    Andrea Pietrabissa
    Luca Morelli
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 651 - 662
  • [29] Procedure-specific Training for Robot-assisted Distal Pancreatectomy
    Klompmaker, Sjors
    van der Vliet, Walderik J.
    Thoolen, Stijn J.
    Ore, Ana Sofia
    Verkoulen, Koen
    Solis-Velasco, Monica
    Canacari, Elena G.
    Kruskal, Jonathan B.
    Khwaja, Khalid O.
    Tseng, Jennifer F.
    Callery, Mark P.
    Kent, Tara S.
    Moser, A. James
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (01) : E18 - E27
  • [30] Robot-assisted spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy: case report
    Kauffmann, Emanuele Federico
    Napoli, Niccolo
    Menonna, Francesca
    Cacace, Concetta
    Genovese, Valerio
    Vistoli, Fabio
    Boggi, Ugo
    ANNALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2021, 6