Systemic Immunity Influences Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation

被引:22
|
作者
Souter, Melanie [1 ,2 ]
Eastwood, Hayden [1 ]
Marovic, Paul [1 ,3 ]
Kel, Gordana [1 ]
Wongprasartsuk, Sarin [1 ,3 ]
Ryan, Allen F. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
O'Leary, Stephen John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Otolaryngol, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hosp, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
[2] Christchurch Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Otolaryngol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Neurosci, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[6] San Diego VA Healthcare Syst, San Diego, CA USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Cochlear implant; Hearing loss; Innate immunity; Keyhole limpet hemocyanin; Systemic immune system; ROUND WINDOW DEXAMETHASONE; ELECTRODE INSERTION TRAUMA; RESIDUAL HEARING; IMPEDANCE; SURGERY; MECHANISMS; THERAPY; BRAIN; CELLS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824bac44
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: To determine whether a systemic immune response influences hearing thresholds and tissue response after cochlear implantation of hearing guinea pigs. Methods: Guinea pigs were inoculated with sterile antigen (Keyhole limpet hemocyanin) 3 weeks before cochlear implantation. Pure-tone auditory brainstem response thresholds were performed before implantation and 1 and 4 weeks later. Dexamethasone phosphate 20% was adsorbed onto a hyaluronic acid carboxymethylcellulose sponge and was applied to the round window for 30 minutes before electrode insertion. Normal saline was used for controls. Cochlear histology was performed at 4 weeks after implantation to assess the tissue response to implantation. To control for the effect of keyhole limpet hemocyanin priming, a group of unprimed animals underwent cochlear implantation with a saline-soaked pledget applied to the round window. Results: Keyhole limpet hemocyanin priming had no significant detrimental effect on thresholds without implantation. Thresholds were elevated after implantation across all frequencies tested (2-Y32 kHz) in primed animals but only at higher frequencies (4-32 kHz) in unprimed controls. In primed animals, dexamethasone treatment significantly reduced threshold shifts at 2 and 8 kHz. Keyhole limpet hemocyanin led to the more frequent observation of lymphocytes in the tissue response to the implant. Conclusion: Systemic immune activation at the time of cochlear implantation broadened the range of frequencies experiencing elevated thresholds after implantation. Local dexamethasone provides partial protection against this hearing loss, but the degree and extent of protection are less compared to previous studies with unprimed animals.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic Review on Surgical Outcomes and Hearing Preservation for Cochlear Implantation in Children and Adults
    Bruijnzeel, Hanneke
    Draaisma, Kaspar
    van Grootel, Roderick
    Stegeman, Inge
    Topsakal, Vedat
    Grolman, Wilko
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2016, 154 (04) : 586 - 596
  • [42] Hearing preservation in children with electric-acoustic stimulation after cochlear implantation
    Rader, T.
    Bohnert, A.
    Matthias, C.
    Koutsimpelas, D.
    Kainz, M-A.
    Strieth, S.
    HNO, 2018, 66 : S56 - S62
  • [43] Impact of the round window membrane accessibility on hearing preservation in adult cochlear implantation
    Mirsalehi, Marjan
    Mohebbi, Saleh
    Ghajarzadeh, Mahsa
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Majdani, Omid
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 274 (08) : 3049 - 3056
  • [44] The Reality of Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: Who Is Utilizing EAS?
    Perkins, Elizabeth
    Lee, Jaclyn
    Manzoor, Nauman
    O'Malley, Matthew
    Bennett, Marc
    Labadie, Robert
    Rivas, Alejandro
    Haynes, David
    Gifford, Rene
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (06) : 832 - 837
  • [45] Dynamic Postural Stability and Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation
    Buhl, Christof
    Artemiev, Dmitri
    Pfiffner, Flurin
    Swanenburg, Jaap
    Veraguth, Dorothe
    Roosli, Christof
    Huber, Alexander
    Dalbert, Adrian
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2018, 23 (04) : 222 - 228
  • [46] The Impact of Electrode Array Length on Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation
    Suhling, Marie-Charlot
    Majdani, Omid
    Salcher, Rolf
    Leifholz, Melanie
    Buechner, Andreas
    Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke
    Lenarz, Thomas
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2016, 37 (08) : 1006 - 1015
  • [47] The Effects of Gusher-Related Intracochlear Pressure Changes on Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: A Comparative Series
    Crohan, William
    Krishnaswamy, Jay
    Rajan, Gunesh
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2018, 23 (03) : 181 - 186
  • [48] Impact of Perioperative Oral Steroid Use on Low-frequency Hearing Preservation After Cochlear Implantation
    Sweeney, Alex D.
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    Zuniga, M. Geraldine
    Bennett, Marc L.
    Wanna, George B.
    Haynes, David S.
    Rivas, Alejandro
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (09) : 1480 - 1485
  • [49] An Evaluation of Preservation of Residual Hearing Using the Suprameatal Approach for Cochlear Implantation: Can This Implantation Technique Be Used for Preservation of Residual Hearing?
    Postelmans, Job T. F.
    van Spronsen, Erik
    Grolman, Wilko
    Stokroos, Robert J.
    Tange, Rinze A.
    Mare, Marcel J.
    Dreschler, Wouter A.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2011, 121 (08) : 1794 - 1799
  • [50] Feasibility of hearing preservation for residual hearing with longer cochlear implant electrodes
    Moteki, Hideaki
    Nishio, Shin-Ya
    Miyagawa, Maiko
    Tsukada, Keita
    Noguchi, Yoshihiro
    Usami, Shin-Ichi
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2018, 138 (12) : 1080 - 1085