Systemic Immunity Influences Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation

被引:22
|
作者
Souter, Melanie [1 ,2 ]
Eastwood, Hayden [1 ]
Marovic, Paul [1 ,3 ]
Kel, Gordana [1 ]
Wongprasartsuk, Sarin [1 ,3 ]
Ryan, Allen F. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
O'Leary, Stephen John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Otolaryngol, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hosp, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
[2] Christchurch Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Otolaryngol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Neurosci, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[6] San Diego VA Healthcare Syst, San Diego, CA USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Cochlear implant; Hearing loss; Innate immunity; Keyhole limpet hemocyanin; Systemic immune system; ROUND WINDOW DEXAMETHASONE; ELECTRODE INSERTION TRAUMA; RESIDUAL HEARING; IMPEDANCE; SURGERY; MECHANISMS; THERAPY; BRAIN; CELLS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824bac44
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: To determine whether a systemic immune response influences hearing thresholds and tissue response after cochlear implantation of hearing guinea pigs. Methods: Guinea pigs were inoculated with sterile antigen (Keyhole limpet hemocyanin) 3 weeks before cochlear implantation. Pure-tone auditory brainstem response thresholds were performed before implantation and 1 and 4 weeks later. Dexamethasone phosphate 20% was adsorbed onto a hyaluronic acid carboxymethylcellulose sponge and was applied to the round window for 30 minutes before electrode insertion. Normal saline was used for controls. Cochlear histology was performed at 4 weeks after implantation to assess the tissue response to implantation. To control for the effect of keyhole limpet hemocyanin priming, a group of unprimed animals underwent cochlear implantation with a saline-soaked pledget applied to the round window. Results: Keyhole limpet hemocyanin priming had no significant detrimental effect on thresholds without implantation. Thresholds were elevated after implantation across all frequencies tested (2-Y32 kHz) in primed animals but only at higher frequencies (4-32 kHz) in unprimed controls. In primed animals, dexamethasone treatment significantly reduced threshold shifts at 2 and 8 kHz. Keyhole limpet hemocyanin led to the more frequent observation of lymphocytes in the tissue response to the implant. Conclusion: Systemic immune activation at the time of cochlear implantation broadened the range of frequencies experiencing elevated thresholds after implantation. Local dexamethasone provides partial protection against this hearing loss, but the degree and extent of protection are less compared to previous studies with unprimed animals.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hearing Preservation Outcomes With a Mid-Scala Electrode in Cochlear Implantation
    Hunter, Jacob B.
    Gifford, Rene H.
    Wanna, George B.
    Labadie, Robert F.
    Bennett, Marc L.
    Haynes, David S.
    Rivas, Alejandro
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2016, 37 (03) : 235 - 240
  • [32] Sialyllactose preserves residual hearing after cochlear implantation
    Lee, Min Young
    Jung, Seo-Kyung
    Jang, Jongmoon
    Choi, Hongsoo
    Choung, Yun-Hoon
    Jang, Jeong Hun
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [33] Individual Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation Using the Concept of Partial Insertion
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Timm, Max Eike
    Salcher, Rolf
    Buechner, Andreas
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2019, 40 (03) : E326 - E335
  • [34] Systemic methylprednisolone for hearing preservation during cochlear implant surgery: A double blinded placebo-controlled trial
    O'Leary, Stephen J.
    Choi, June
    Brady, Karina
    Matthews, Sheila
    Ozdowska, Katie Boncza
    Payne, Matthew
    McLean, Tim
    Rousset, Alex
    Lo, Jonathon
    Creber, Nathan
    Tari, Sylvia
    Dowell, Richard
    Briggs, Robert
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2021, 404
  • [35] Preimplant Hearing Threshold: An Important Predictor of Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation With Lateral Wall Electrodes
    Lee, Geonho
    Lee, Seulgi
    Chung, Jee-Hye
    Choi, Jin Woong
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (02) : E145 - E152
  • [36] Hearing Preservation Surgery for Cochlear Implantation-Hearing and Quality of Life After 2 Years
    Maria, Peter L. Santa
    Domville-Lewis, Chloe
    Sucher, Catherine M.
    Chester-Browne, Ronel
    Atlas, Marcus D.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2013, 34 (03) : 526 - 531
  • [37] Cochlear Microphonics in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantees
    Lorens, Artur
    Walkowiak, Adam
    Polak, Marek
    Kowalczuk, Aleksandra
    Furmanek, Mariusz
    Skarzynski, Henryk
    Obrycka, Anita
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED OTOLOGY, 2019, 15 (03) : 345 - 351
  • [38] Air-Bone Gaps Contribute to Functional Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation
    Mattingly, Jameson K.
    Uhler, Kristin M.
    Cass, Stephen P.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2016, 37 (09) : 1255 - 1262
  • [39] Variability in Perioperative Steroid Therapy Regimen for Cochlear Implantation as It Relates to Hearing Preservation
    Derdzakyan, Nicole A.
    Lava, Christian X.
    Hakimi, Amir A.
    Johns, J. Dixon
    Kim, H. Jeffrey
    Hoa, Michael
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2024, 45 (01) : E28 - E35
  • [40] National study of hearing preservation rates and outcomes after cochlear implantation in Ireland
    Gendre, Adrien
    Quinn, Sarah
    Jones, Holly
    Hintze, Justin
    Simoes-Franklin, Cristina
    Walshe, Peter
    Viani, Laura
    Glynn, Fergal
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 23 (05) : 241 - 248