Systemic Immunity Influences Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation

被引:22
|
作者
Souter, Melanie [1 ,2 ]
Eastwood, Hayden [1 ]
Marovic, Paul [1 ,3 ]
Kel, Gordana [1 ]
Wongprasartsuk, Sarin [1 ,3 ]
Ryan, Allen F. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
O'Leary, Stephen John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Otolaryngol, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hosp, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
[2] Christchurch Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Otolaryngol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Neurosci, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[6] San Diego VA Healthcare Syst, San Diego, CA USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Cochlear implant; Hearing loss; Innate immunity; Keyhole limpet hemocyanin; Systemic immune system; ROUND WINDOW DEXAMETHASONE; ELECTRODE INSERTION TRAUMA; RESIDUAL HEARING; IMPEDANCE; SURGERY; MECHANISMS; THERAPY; BRAIN; CELLS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824bac44
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: To determine whether a systemic immune response influences hearing thresholds and tissue response after cochlear implantation of hearing guinea pigs. Methods: Guinea pigs were inoculated with sterile antigen (Keyhole limpet hemocyanin) 3 weeks before cochlear implantation. Pure-tone auditory brainstem response thresholds were performed before implantation and 1 and 4 weeks later. Dexamethasone phosphate 20% was adsorbed onto a hyaluronic acid carboxymethylcellulose sponge and was applied to the round window for 30 minutes before electrode insertion. Normal saline was used for controls. Cochlear histology was performed at 4 weeks after implantation to assess the tissue response to implantation. To control for the effect of keyhole limpet hemocyanin priming, a group of unprimed animals underwent cochlear implantation with a saline-soaked pledget applied to the round window. Results: Keyhole limpet hemocyanin priming had no significant detrimental effect on thresholds without implantation. Thresholds were elevated after implantation across all frequencies tested (2-Y32 kHz) in primed animals but only at higher frequencies (4-32 kHz) in unprimed controls. In primed animals, dexamethasone treatment significantly reduced threshold shifts at 2 and 8 kHz. Keyhole limpet hemocyanin led to the more frequent observation of lymphocytes in the tissue response to the implant. Conclusion: Systemic immune activation at the time of cochlear implantation broadened the range of frequencies experiencing elevated thresholds after implantation. Local dexamethasone provides partial protection against this hearing loss, but the degree and extent of protection are less compared to previous studies with unprimed animals.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genetic testing has the potential to impact hearing preservation following cochlear implantation
    Yoshimura, Hidekane
    Moteki, Hideaki
    Nishio, Shin-ya
    Miyajima, Hiroki
    Miyagawa, Maiko
    Usami, Shin-ichi
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2020, 140 (06) : 438 - 444
  • [22] Advances in hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery
    Tarabichi, Osama
    Jensen, Megan
    Hansen, Marlan R.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2021, 29 (05) : 385 - 390
  • [23] Evolution of electrode array diameter for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation
    Yann Nguyen
    Mosnier, Isabelle
    Borel, Stephanie
    Ambert-Dahan, Emmanuelle
    Bouccara, Didier
    Bozorg-Grayeli, Alexis
    Ferrary, Evelyne
    Sterkers, Olivier
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2013, 133 (02) : 116 - 122
  • [24] Hearing Preservation With Standard Length Electrodes in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation
    Manjaly, Joseph G.
    Nash, Robert
    Ellis, Wayne
    Britz, Anzel
    Lavy, Jeremy A.
    Shaida, Azhar
    Saeed, Shakeel R.
    Khalil, Sherif S.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2018, 39 (09) : 1109 - 1114
  • [25] The Role of Preoperative Steroids for Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kuthubutheen, Jafri
    Joglekar, Samidha
    Smith, Leah
    Friesen, Lendra
    Smilsky, Kari
    Millman, Tara
    Ng, Amy
    Shipp, David
    Coates, Harvey
    Arnoldner, Christoph
    Nedzelski, Julian
    Chen, Joseph
    Lin, Vincent
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2017, 22 (4-5) : 292 - 302
  • [26] Hearing Preservation Techniques in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Madgar, Ory
    Shaffer, Amber D.
    Gerges, Daniel
    Kitsko, Dennis J.
    Chi, David H.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2025, : 1539 - 1547
  • [27] Clinical perspective on hearing preservation in cochlear implantation, the University of Iowa experience
    Gantz, Bruce J.
    Hansen, Marlan
    Dunn, Camille C.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2022, 426
  • [28] Adaptation of the Standardized Hearing Outcomes Scattergram to Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation
    Perkins, Elizabeth L.
    Manzoor, Nauman F.
    Haynes, David S.
    O'Malley, Matthew
    Gifford, Rene
    Rivas, Alejandro
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (06) : 838 - 843
  • [29] Hearing Preservation Among Patients Undergoing Cochlear Implantation
    Van Abel, Kathryn M.
    Dunn, Camille C.
    Sladen, Douglas P.
    Oleson, Jacob J.
    Beatty, Charles W.
    Neff, Brian A.
    Hansen, Marlan
    Gantz, Bruce J.
    Driscoll, Colin L. W.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (03) : 416 - 421
  • [30] Cochlear Implantation: Is Hearing Preservation Necessary in Severe to Profound Hearing Loss?
    Derinsu, Ufuk
    Serin, Gediz Murat
    Akdas, Ferda
    Batman, Caglar
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 22 (02) : 520 - 522