Systemic Immunity Influences Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation

被引:22
|
作者
Souter, Melanie [1 ,2 ]
Eastwood, Hayden [1 ]
Marovic, Paul [1 ,3 ]
Kel, Gordana [1 ]
Wongprasartsuk, Sarin [1 ,3 ]
Ryan, Allen F. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
O'Leary, Stephen John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Otolaryngol, Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hosp, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
[2] Christchurch Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Otolaryngol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Neurosci, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[6] San Diego VA Healthcare Syst, San Diego, CA USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Cochlear implant; Hearing loss; Innate immunity; Keyhole limpet hemocyanin; Systemic immune system; ROUND WINDOW DEXAMETHASONE; ELECTRODE INSERTION TRAUMA; RESIDUAL HEARING; IMPEDANCE; SURGERY; MECHANISMS; THERAPY; BRAIN; CELLS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824bac44
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: To determine whether a systemic immune response influences hearing thresholds and tissue response after cochlear implantation of hearing guinea pigs. Methods: Guinea pigs were inoculated with sterile antigen (Keyhole limpet hemocyanin) 3 weeks before cochlear implantation. Pure-tone auditory brainstem response thresholds were performed before implantation and 1 and 4 weeks later. Dexamethasone phosphate 20% was adsorbed onto a hyaluronic acid carboxymethylcellulose sponge and was applied to the round window for 30 minutes before electrode insertion. Normal saline was used for controls. Cochlear histology was performed at 4 weeks after implantation to assess the tissue response to implantation. To control for the effect of keyhole limpet hemocyanin priming, a group of unprimed animals underwent cochlear implantation with a saline-soaked pledget applied to the round window. Results: Keyhole limpet hemocyanin priming had no significant detrimental effect on thresholds without implantation. Thresholds were elevated after implantation across all frequencies tested (2-Y32 kHz) in primed animals but only at higher frequencies (4-32 kHz) in unprimed controls. In primed animals, dexamethasone treatment significantly reduced threshold shifts at 2 and 8 kHz. Keyhole limpet hemocyanin led to the more frequent observation of lymphocytes in the tissue response to the implant. Conclusion: Systemic immune activation at the time of cochlear implantation broadened the range of frequencies experiencing elevated thresholds after implantation. Local dexamethasone provides partial protection against this hearing loss, but the degree and extent of protection are less compared to previous studies with unprimed animals.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 538
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hearing preservation in pediatric cochlear implantation
    Marinelli, John P.
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2024, 32 (06) : 410 - 415
  • [2] Functional Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: The Miami Cocktail Effect
    Angeli, Simon Ignacio
    Brown, C. Scott
    Holcomb, Meredith A.
    Velandia, Sandra L.
    Eshraghi, Adrien A.
    Chiossone-Kerdel, Juan Armando
    Hoffer, Michael E.
    Sanchez, Chrisanda
    Telischi, Fred F.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2024, 45 (04) : 376 - 385
  • [3] Hearing Preservation in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    Patel, Neil S.
    Tombers, Nicole M.
    DeJong, Melissa D.
    Breneman, Alyce I.
    Neff, Brian A.
    Driscoll, Colin L. W.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2017, 38 (06) : E128 - E133
  • [4] Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation in Adolescents
    Bruce, Iain A.
    Felton, Mark
    Lockley, Morag
    Melling, Christine
    Lloyd, Simon K.
    Freeman, Simon R.
    Green, Kevin M. J.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (09) : 1552 - 1559
  • [5] Hearing preservation using topical dexamethasone alone and associated with hyaluronic acid in cochlear implantation
    Ramos, Bernardo Faria
    Tsuji, Robinson Koji
    Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
    Schmidt Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valeria
    Ramos, Henrique Faria
    Samuel, Paola Angelica
    Brito, Rubens
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2015, 135 (05) : 473 - 477
  • [6] Residual Hearing Preservation After Pediatric Cochlear Implantation
    Brown, Ryan F.
    Hullar, Timothy E.
    Cadieux, Jamie H.
    Chole, Richard A.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (08) : 1221 - 1226
  • [7] Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation
    Shepherd, Robert
    Gantz, Bruce
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2023, 434
  • [8] Hearing Preservation and Speech Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation in Meniere's Disease
    Masood, Maheer M.
    Farquhar, Douglas R.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    Pillsbury, Harold C.
    King, English R.
    O'Connell, Brendan P.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2020, 130 (12) : 2874 - 2878
  • [9] Electrocochleography during Cochlear Implantation for Hearing Preservation
    Mandala, Marco
    Colletti, Liliana
    Tonoli, Giovanni
    Colletti, Vittorio
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2012, 146 (05) : 774 - 781
  • [10] Factors affecting residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation
    Zanetti, D.
    Nassif, N.
    Redaelli De Zinis, L. O.
    ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA, 2015, 35 (06) : 433 - 441