Intrapartum antibiotics for known maternal Group B streptococcal colonization

被引:22
|
作者
Ohlsson, Arne [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shah, Vibhuti S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2013年 / 01期
关键词
Labor; Obstetric; Streptococcus agalactiae; Ampicillin [therapeutic use; Anti-Bacterial Agents [therapeutic use; Carrier State [drug therapy; Infant; Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission; Vertical; prevention; control; Penicillin G [therapeutic use; Penicillins [therapeutic use; Streptococcal Infections [prevention & control; transmission; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; SEROLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION; INTRAMUSCULAR PENICILLIN; NEONATAL SEPTICEMIA; RISK-FACTORS; DISEASE; CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS; PROPHYLAXIS; INFECTIONS; PREVENTION; TRANSMISSION;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD007467.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Maternal colonization with group B streptococcus (GBS) during pregnancy increases the risk of neonatal infection by vertical transmission. Administration of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) during labor has been associated with a reduction in early onset GBS disease (EOGBSD). However, treating all colonized women during labor exposes a large number of women and infants to possible adverse effects without benefit. Objectives To assess the effect of IAP for maternal GBS colonization on neonatal: 1) all cause mortality and 2) morbidity from proven and probable EOGBSD, late onset GBS disease (LOD), maternal infectious outcomes and allergic reactions to antibiotics. Search methods We updated the search of the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register on 10 November 2012. Selection criteria Randomized trials assessing the impact of maternal IAP on neonatal GBS infections were included. Data collection and analysis We independently assessed eligibility and quality of the studies. Main results We did not identify any new trials from the updated search so the results remain unchanged as follows. Three trials (involving 852 women) evaluating the effects of IAP versus no treatment were included. The risk of bias was high. The use of IAP did not significantly reduce the incidence of all cause mortality, mortality from GBS infection or from infections caused by bacteria other than GBS. The incidence of early GBS infection was reduced with IAP compared to no treatment (risk ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.74, three trials, 488 infants; risk difference -0.04, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.01; number needed to treat to benefit 25, 95% CI 14 to 100, I-2 0%). The incidence of LOD or sepsis from organisms other than GBS and puerperal infection was not significantly different between groups. One trial (involving 352 women) compared intrapartum ampicillin versus penicillin and reported no significant difference in neonatal or maternal outcomes. Authors' conclusions Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis appeared to reduce EOGBSD, but this result may well be a result of bias as we found a high risk of bias for one or more key domains in the study methodology and execution. There is lack of evidence from well designed and conducted trials to recommend IAP to reduce neonatal EOGBSD. Ideally the effectiveness of IAP to reduce neonatal GBS infections should be studied in adequately sized double-blind controlled trials. The opportunity to conduct such trials has likely been lost, as practice guidelines (albeit without good evidence) have been introduced in many jurisdictions.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Colonization, serotypes and transmission rates of group B streptococci in pregnant women and their infants born at a single University Center in Germany
    Kunze, Mirjam
    Ziegler, Anna
    Fluegge, Kirsten
    Hentschel, Roland
    Proempeler, Heinrich
    Berner, Reinhard
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (04) : 417 - 422
  • [42] INTRAPARTUM PREVENTION OF EARLY ONSET GROUP B STREPTOCOCCAL INFECTION
    Barbieri, Francesca
    Mastrogiacomo, Annunziata
    Cobellis, Luigi
    GAZZETTA MEDICA ITALIANA ARCHIVIO PER LE SCIENZE MEDICHE, 2021, 180 (1-2) : 54 - 58
  • [43] Maternal and neonatal outcomes of Group B Streptococcus colonization: a retrospective study
    Jin, Guixiu
    Liu, Lanhua
    Wang, Xiaolong
    Fei, Junling
    Zhu, Zhenling
    Jiang, Ziyan
    Liu, Min
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [44] The effect of group B streptococcus on maternal and infants' prognosis in Guizhou, China
    Dai, Wei
    Zhang, Youcheng
    Xu, Yin
    Zhu, Mingjuan
    Rong, Xiaotin
    Zhong, Qing
    BIOSCIENCE REPORTS, 2019, 39
  • [45] Maternal age and body mass index as risk factors for rectovaginal colonization with group B streptococci
    Khalil, Mohammed R.
    Hartvigsen, Camilla M.
    Thorsen, Poul B.
    Moller, Jens K.
    Uldbjerg, Niels
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 161 (01) : 303 - 307
  • [46] Determinants of group B streptococcus maternal colonization and factors related to its vertical perinatal transmission: Case-control study
    Dahan-Saal, J.
    Gerardin, P.
    Robillard, P. -Y.
    Barau, G.
    Bouveret, A.
    Picot, S.
    Fianu, A.
    Boukerrou, M.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2011, 39 (05): : 281 - 288
  • [47] Group B Streptococcal Disease in Infants: Progress in Prevention and Continued Challenges
    Verani, Jennifer R.
    Schrag, Stephanie J.
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2010, 37 (02) : 375 - +
  • [48] Neonatal group B streptococcal disease: from pathogenesis to preventive strategies
    Melin, P.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2011, 17 (09) : 1294 - 1303
  • [49] Group B Streptococcal Colonization, Molecular Characteristics, and Epidemiology
    Shabayek, Sarah
    Spellerberg, Barbara
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [50] Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for women who are screened positive for group B streptococcal colonisation: Clinical compliance with the guideline
    Braye, Kathryn
    Ferguson, John
    Ball, Jean
    Foureur, Maralyn
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 61 (06) : 870 - 875