Intrapartum antibiotics for known maternal Group B streptococcal colonization

被引:22
|
作者
Ohlsson, Arne [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shah, Vibhuti S. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2013年 / 01期
关键词
Labor; Obstetric; Streptococcus agalactiae; Ampicillin [therapeutic use; Anti-Bacterial Agents [therapeutic use; Carrier State [drug therapy; Infant; Newborn; Infectious Disease Transmission; Vertical; prevention; control; Penicillin G [therapeutic use; Penicillins [therapeutic use; Streptococcal Infections [prevention & control; transmission; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; SEROLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION; INTRAMUSCULAR PENICILLIN; NEONATAL SEPTICEMIA; RISK-FACTORS; DISEASE; CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS; PROPHYLAXIS; INFECTIONS; PREVENTION; TRANSMISSION;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD007467.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Maternal colonization with group B streptococcus (GBS) during pregnancy increases the risk of neonatal infection by vertical transmission. Administration of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) during labor has been associated with a reduction in early onset GBS disease (EOGBSD). However, treating all colonized women during labor exposes a large number of women and infants to possible adverse effects without benefit. Objectives To assess the effect of IAP for maternal GBS colonization on neonatal: 1) all cause mortality and 2) morbidity from proven and probable EOGBSD, late onset GBS disease (LOD), maternal infectious outcomes and allergic reactions to antibiotics. Search methods We updated the search of the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register on 10 November 2012. Selection criteria Randomized trials assessing the impact of maternal IAP on neonatal GBS infections were included. Data collection and analysis We independently assessed eligibility and quality of the studies. Main results We did not identify any new trials from the updated search so the results remain unchanged as follows. Three trials (involving 852 women) evaluating the effects of IAP versus no treatment were included. The risk of bias was high. The use of IAP did not significantly reduce the incidence of all cause mortality, mortality from GBS infection or from infections caused by bacteria other than GBS. The incidence of early GBS infection was reduced with IAP compared to no treatment (risk ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.74, three trials, 488 infants; risk difference -0.04, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.01; number needed to treat to benefit 25, 95% CI 14 to 100, I-2 0%). The incidence of LOD or sepsis from organisms other than GBS and puerperal infection was not significantly different between groups. One trial (involving 352 women) compared intrapartum ampicillin versus penicillin and reported no significant difference in neonatal or maternal outcomes. Authors' conclusions Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis appeared to reduce EOGBSD, but this result may well be a result of bias as we found a high risk of bias for one or more key domains in the study methodology and execution. There is lack of evidence from well designed and conducted trials to recommend IAP to reduce neonatal EOGBSD. Ideally the effectiveness of IAP to reduce neonatal GBS infections should be studied in adequately sized double-blind controlled trials. The opportunity to conduct such trials has likely been lost, as practice guidelines (albeit without good evidence) have been introduced in many jurisdictions.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antibiotic Prevention for Maternal Group B Streptococcal Colonization on Neonatal GBS-Related Adverse Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis
    Li, Shunming
    Huang, Jingya
    Chen, Zhiyao
    Guo, Dan
    Yao, Zhenjiang
    Ye, Xiaohua
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [32] Group B streptococcal disease and genotypes in Australian infants
    Ko, Danny Wh
    Zurynski, Yvonne
    Gilbert, Gwendolyn L.
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2015, 51 (08) : 808 - 814
  • [33] Early Onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Sepsis
    Oh, William
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2013, 30 (02) : 143 - 147
  • [34] Group B Streptococcal Infection in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: Maternal Colonization and Neonatal Infection
    Almaghrabi, Safa Yousef
    ARCHIVES OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2022, 13 (04) : 52 - 56
  • [35] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INTRAPARTUM SCREENING AND TREATMENT FOR MATERNAL GROUP-B STREPTOCOCCI COLONIZATION
    STRICKLAND, DM
    YEOMANS, ER
    HANKINS, GDV
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 163 (01) : 4 - 8
  • [36] Changing epidemiology of group B streptococcal colonization
    Hickman, ME
    Rench, MA
    Ferrieri, P
    Baker, CJ
    PEDIATRICS, 1999, 104 (02) : 203 - 209
  • [37] Obesity as an independent risk factor for group B streptococcal colonization
    Alvareza, Mitchell D.
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Tang, Ying
    Edwards, Rodney K.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (23) : 2876 - 2879
  • [38] Association Between Maternal Obesity and Group B Streptococcus Colonization in a National US Cohort
    Venkatesh, Kartik K.
    Vladutiu, Catherine J.
    Strauss, Robert A.
    Thorp, John M.
    Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.
    Stamilio, David M.
    Hughes, Brenna L.
    Dotters-Katz, Sarah
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 29 (12) : 1507 - 1512
  • [39] Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: Experience in the United States and implications for a potential group B streptococcal vaccine
    Schrag, Stephanie J.
    Verani, Jennifer R.
    VACCINE, 2013, 31 : D20 - D26
  • [40] Genital tract group B streptococcal colonization in pregnant women: a South Indian perspective
    Sharmila, Vijayan
    Joseph, Noyal Mariya
    Babu, Thirunavukkarasu Arun
    Chaturvedula, Latha
    Sistla, Sujatha
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2011, 5 (08): : 592 - 595