Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: audit study

被引:285
作者
Semigran, Hannah L. [1 ]
Linder, Jeffrey A. [2 ,3 ]
Gidengil, Courtney [4 ,5 ]
Mehrotra, Ateev [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[4] Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Boston, MA USA
[5] RAND Corp, Boston, MA USA
[6] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Gen Internal Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2015年 / 351卷
关键词
TELEPHONE TRIAGE; GENERAL-PRACTICE; UNITED-STATES; CARE; ACCURACY; INTERNET; CONSULTATION; INFORMATION; PHYSICIAN; RESOURCE;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.h3480
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To determine the diagnostic and triage accuracy of online symptom checkers (tools that use computer algorithms to help patients with self diagnosis or self triage). DESIGN Audit study. SETTING Publicly available, free symptom checkers. PARTICIPANTS 23 symptom checkers that were in English and provided advice across a range of conditions. 45 standardized patient vignettes were compiled and equally divided into three categories of triage urgency: emergent care required (for example, pulmonary embolism), non-emergent care reasonable (for example, otitis media), and self care reasonable (for example, viral upper respiratory tract infection). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES For symptom checkers that provided a diagnosis, our main outcomes were whether the symptom checker listed the correct diagnosis first or within the first 20 potential diagnoses (n= 770 standardized patient evaluations). For symptom checkers that provided a triage recommendation, our main outcomes were whether the symptom checker correctly recommended emergent care, non-emergent care, or self care (n= 532 standardized patient evaluations). RESULTS The 23 symptom checkers provided the correct diagnosis first in 34% (95% confidence interval 31% to 37%) of standardized patient evaluations, listed the correct diagnosis within the top 20 diagnoses given in 58% (55% to 62%) of standardized patient evaluations, and provided the appropriate triage advice in 57% (52% to 61%) of standardized patient evaluations. Triage performance varied by urgency of condition, with appropriate triage advice provided in 80% (95% confidence interval 75% to 86%) of emergent cases, 55% (47% to 63%) of non-emergent cases, and 33% (26% to 40%) of self care cases (P<0.001). Performance on appropriate triage advice across the 23 individual symptom checkers ranged from 33% (95% confidence interval 19% to 48%) to 78% (64% to 91%) of standardized patient evaluations. CONCLUSIONS Symptom checkers had deficits in both triage and diagnosis. Triage advice from symptom checkers is generally risk averse, encouraging users to seek care for conditions where self care is reasonable.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, ENG MED BIOL SOC EMB
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, Reuters
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, TELEGRAPH
  • [4] Antibiotic Prescribing for Adults With Acute Bronchitis in the United States, 1996-2010
    Barnett, Michael L.
    Linder, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (19): : 2020 - 2022
  • [5] Antibiotic Prescribing to Adults With Sore Throat in the United States, 1997-2010
    Barnett, Michael L.
    Linder, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (01) : 138 - 140
  • [6] Evaluation of the Accuracy of Smartphone Medical Calculation Apps
    Bierbrier, Rachel
    Lo, Vivian
    Wu, Robert C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (02)
  • [7] Accuracy of a Computer-Based Diagnostic Program for Ambulatory Patients With Knee Pain
    Bisson, Leslie J.
    Komm, Jorden T.
    Bernas, Geoffrey A.
    Fineberg, Marc S.
    Marzo, John M.
    Rauh, Michael A.
    Smolinski, Robert J.
    Wind, William M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (10) : 2371 - 2376
  • [8] Black Peter, 2009, Br J Nurs, V18, P1157
  • [9] Why do people Google epilepsy? An infodemiological study of online behavior for epilepsy-related search terms
    Brigo, Francesco
    Igwe, Stanley C.
    Ausserer, Harald
    Nardone, Raffaele
    Tezzon, Frediano
    Bongiovanni, Luigi Giuseppe
    Trinka, Eugen
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2014, 31 : 67 - 70
  • [10] Bunn F, 2005, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V55, P956