Structure Design and Optimization of the C5-C6 Cervical Intervertebral Fusion Cage Using the Anterior Cervical Plate and Cage Fixation System

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Jiajia [1 ,2 ]
Qian, Zhihui [2 ]
Cui, Changlei [3 ]
Guo, Zhijun [4 ]
Ren, Luquan [2 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Agr Equipment Engn, Luoyang, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Bion Engn, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[3] First Hosp Jilin Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[4] Henan Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Vehicle & Transportat Engn, Luoyang, Henan, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2020年 / 26卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Finite Element Analysis; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Implantation; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; INTERBODY FUSION; NECK MOVEMENTS; MODEL; LOAD; VALIDATION; SUBSIDENCE; DISKECTOMY; STABILITY;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.924236
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The fifth and sixth cervical vertebra (C5-C6) is the most easily injured segment encountered in clinical practice. The anterior cervical plate and cage (ACPC) fixation system is always used to reconstruct the intervertebral height and maintain the segmental stability. The postoperative effect, such as subsidence, neck pain, and non-fusion, is greatly affected by the cervical cage structure design. This study determined reasonable structure size parameters that present optimized biomechanical properties related to the postoperative subsidence often accompanied with ACPC. Material/Methods: Twenty bionic cages with different structural sizes (distance between the center of the cage and groove, groove depth, and groove width) were designed and analyzed based on the regression optimization design and analysis method combined with FE analysis. Because a previous study showed that greater stresses on the endplate are associated with higher risk of subsidence, the optimization object was selected as the stresses on endplate to lower it. Results: The postoperative stresses on the endplate of all cages with bionic structure design were proved to be low- er than with the original one. The optimal structure size was the distance between the center of the cage and groove=0 mm, groove depth=3 mm, and groove width=4 mm. Regression analysis found the cage with optimized bionic structural parameters resulted in a 22.58% reduction of endplate stress response compared with the original one. Conclusions: The bionic cage with optimized structural sizes can reduce the subsidence risk, suggesting that the optimization method has great potential applications in the biomechanical engineering field.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long term results of simultaneous cornerstone carbon cage fusion and anterior cervical plate fixation in cervical degenerative disc disease with ligament instability
    Kowalczyk, P
    Zakrzewska, A
    Marchel, A
    Proceedings of the 13th World Congress of Neurological Surgery, Vols 1 and 2, 2005, : 109 - 112
  • [22] Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Double Cylindrical Cage versus an Anterior Cervical Plating System with Iliac Crest Autografts for the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
    Kim, Seong Joon
    Kim, Sang Don
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 55 (01) : 12 - 17
  • [23] Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer-ROI-C-Fixation and Combined Intervertebral Cage and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Study from a Single Center
    He, Shuangjun
    Zhou, Zhangzhe
    Lv, Nanning
    Shao, Xiaofeng
    Zhou, Xinfeng
    Wang, Yaowei
    Wu, Shuhua
    Chen, Kangwu
    Zhou, Lijian
    Qian, Zhonglai
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2021, 27
  • [24] Three- and four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a PEEK cage and plate construct
    Song, Kyung-Jin
    Yoon, Sun-Jung
    Lee, Kwang-Bok
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (12) : 2492 - 2497
  • [25] Biomechanical Effect of C5/C6 Intervertebral Reconstructive Height on Adjacent Segments in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - A Finite Element Analysis
    Zhou, Jia-ming
    Guo, Xing
    Kang, Liang
    Zhao, Rui
    Yang, Xiao-tian
    Fu, Yi-bin
    Xue, Yuan
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1408 - 1416
  • [26] Comparative Analysis of Cage Subsidence in Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: Zero Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C) vs. Conventional Cage and Plate Construct
    Jin, Zhe-yu
    Teng, Yun
    Wang, Hua-zheng
    Yang, Hui-lin
    Lu, Ying-jie
    Gan, Min-feng
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [27] Clinical and radiological comparison of the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Zhang, Jun
    Wang, Shanxi
    Tang, Xiangyu
    Xiong, Wei
    Wu, Hua
    Liu, Chaoxu
    Li, Feng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 27 (01)
  • [28] Comparison of the Postoperative Motion Stabilization Between Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion with a Zero-Profile Implant System and a Plate-Cage Construct
    Abudouaini, Haimiti
    Wu, Tingkui
    Liu, Hao
    Wang, Beiyu
    Chen, Hua
    Li, Lijun
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 166 : E484 - E494
  • [29] Efficacy of combined anteroposterior fusion with no plate versus anterior fusion alone with cage and plate for multilevel degenerative cervical disease
    Song, Kyung-Jin
    Song, Ji-Soo
    Kim, Do-Yeon
    Shim, Dong Gun
    Lee, Kwang-Bok
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (04) : 598 - 603
  • [30] Usefulness of anterior cervical fusion using titanium interbody cage for treatment of cervical degenerative disease with preoperative segmental kyphosis
    Hosoi, Kunihiko
    Tonomura, Hitoshi
    Takatori, Ryota
    Nagae, Masateru
    Mikami, Yasuo
    Osawa, Toru
    Arai, Yuji
    Fujiwara, Hiroyoshi
    Kubo, Toshikazu
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (32)