Decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses

被引:42
|
作者
Bucher, Hans Ulrich [1 ]
Klein, Sabine D. [1 ]
Hendriks, Manya J. [1 ,2 ]
Baumann-Hoelzle, Ruth [3 ]
Berger, Thomas M. [4 ]
Streuli, Jurg C. [2 ]
Fauchere, Jean-Claude [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Neonatol, Frauenklin Str 10, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Inst Biomed Eth & Hist Med, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Dialogue Eth Fdn, Interdisciplinary Inst Eth Hlth Care, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Childrens Hosp Lucerne, Neonatal & Paediat Intens Care Unit, Luzern, Switzerland
来源
BMC PEDIATRICS | 2018年 / 18卷
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Extremely preterm infants; Neonatal intensive care; End-of-life decisions; Shared decision-making; Health care professionals; Previable period; OF-LIFE DECISIONS; EXTREMELY PRETERM INFANTS; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE; PARENTS; ATTITUDES; RESUSCITATION; NATIONWIDE; GUIDELINE; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1186/s12887-018-1040-z
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: In the last 20 years, the chances for intact survival for extremely preterm infants have increased in high income countries. Decisions about withholding or withdrawing intensive care remain a major challenge in infants born at the limits of viability. Shared decision-making regarding these fragile infants between health care professionals and parents has become the preferred model today. However, there is an ongoing ethical debate on how decisions regarding life-sustaining treatment should be reached and who should have the final word when health care professionals and parents do not agree. We designed a survey among neonatologists and neonatal nurses to analyze practices, difficulties and parental involvement in end-of-life decisions for extremely preterm infants. Methods: All 552 physicians and nurses with at least 12 months work experience in level III neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Switzerland were invited to participate in an online survey with 50 questions. Differences between neonatologists and NICU nurses and between language regions were explored. Results: Ninety six of 121 (79%) physicians and 302 of 431(70%) nurses completed the online questionnaire. The following difficulties with end-of-life decision-making were reported more frequently by nurses than physicians: insufficient time for decision-making, legal constraints and lack of consistent unit policies. Nurses also mentioned a lack of solidarity in our society and shortage of services for disabled more often than physicians. In the context of limiting intensive care in selected circumstances, nurses considered withholding tube feedings and respiratory support less acceptable than physicians. Nurses were more reluctant to give parents full authority to decide on the course of action for their infant. In contrast to professional category (nurse or physician), language region, professional experience and religion had little influence if any on the answers given. Conclusions: Physicians and nurses differ in many aspects of how and by whom end-of-life decisions should be made in extremely preterm infants. The divergencies between nurses and physicians may be due to differences in ethics education, varying focus in patient care and direct exposure to the patients. Acknowledging these differences is important to avoid potential conflicts within the neonatal team but also with parents in the process of end-of-life decision-making in preterm infants born at the limits of viability.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decision-making in childhood cancer: parents' and adolescents' views and perceptions
    Robertson, Eden G.
    Wakefield, Claire E.
    Shaw, Joanne
    Darlington, Anne-Sophie
    McGill, Brittany C.
    Cohn, Richard J.
    Fardell, Joanna E.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2019, 27 (11) : 4331 - 4340
  • [32] THE IMPACT OF ETHICAL AND LEGAL DECISION-MAKING IN NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE ON PSYCHO SOCIAL WELLBEING OF THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS The Overview of the HUNIC Project Study Design
    Feith, Helga Judit
    Kiss, Zsuzsanna Soosne
    Pilling, Janos
    Kovacs, Aranka
    Szabo, Miklo
    Cuttini, Marina
    Berbik, Istvan
    Gezsi, Andras
    Gradvohl, Edina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 14 (02) : 311 - 323
  • [33] Ethical decision-making regarding infant viability: A discussion
    Kelly, Janet
    Welch, Emma
    NURSING ETHICS, 2018, 25 (07) : 897 - 905
  • [34] Postponed Withholding: Balanced Decision-Making at the Margins of Viability
    Syltern, Janicke
    Ursin, Lars
    Solberg, Berge
    Stoen, Ragnhild
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2022, 22 (11) : 15 - 26
  • [35] Nurses' decision-making in cases of physical restraint: a synthesis of qualitative evidence
    Goethals, Sabine
    de Casterle, Bernadette Dierckx
    Gastmans, Chris
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2012, 68 (06) : 1198 - 1210
  • [36] Do neonatologists limit parental decision-making authority? A Canadian perspective
    Albersheim, Susan G.
    Lavoie, Pascal M.
    Keidar, Yaron D.
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 86 (12) : 801 - 805
  • [37] The perceptions and experiences of community nurses and patients towards shared decision-making in the home setting: An integrative review
    Mills, Katie
    McGeagh, Lucy
    Waite, Marion
    Aveyard, Helen
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2025, 81 (02) : 679 - 700
  • [38] Critical care nurses, ethical decision-making and stress
    Erlen, JA
    Sereika, SM
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1997, 26 (05) : 953 - 961
  • [39] Relationship between physicians' death anxiety and medical communication and decision-making: A systematic review
    Draper, Emma J.
    Hillen, Marij A.
    Moors, Marleen
    Ket, Johannes C. F.
    van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
    Henselmans, Inge
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (02) : 266 - 274
  • [40] Shared decision-making in an intercultural context - Barriers in the interaction between physicians and immigrant patients
    Suurmond, J
    Seeleman, C
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 60 (02) : 253 - 259