Decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses

被引:42
|
作者
Bucher, Hans Ulrich [1 ]
Klein, Sabine D. [1 ]
Hendriks, Manya J. [1 ,2 ]
Baumann-Hoelzle, Ruth [3 ]
Berger, Thomas M. [4 ]
Streuli, Jurg C. [2 ]
Fauchere, Jean-Claude [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Neonatol, Frauenklin Str 10, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Inst Biomed Eth & Hist Med, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Dialogue Eth Fdn, Interdisciplinary Inst Eth Hlth Care, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Childrens Hosp Lucerne, Neonatal & Paediat Intens Care Unit, Luzern, Switzerland
来源
BMC PEDIATRICS | 2018年 / 18卷
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Extremely preterm infants; Neonatal intensive care; End-of-life decisions; Shared decision-making; Health care professionals; Previable period; OF-LIFE DECISIONS; EXTREMELY PRETERM INFANTS; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE; PARENTS; ATTITUDES; RESUSCITATION; NATIONWIDE; GUIDELINE; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1186/s12887-018-1040-z
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: In the last 20 years, the chances for intact survival for extremely preterm infants have increased in high income countries. Decisions about withholding or withdrawing intensive care remain a major challenge in infants born at the limits of viability. Shared decision-making regarding these fragile infants between health care professionals and parents has become the preferred model today. However, there is an ongoing ethical debate on how decisions regarding life-sustaining treatment should be reached and who should have the final word when health care professionals and parents do not agree. We designed a survey among neonatologists and neonatal nurses to analyze practices, difficulties and parental involvement in end-of-life decisions for extremely preterm infants. Methods: All 552 physicians and nurses with at least 12 months work experience in level III neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Switzerland were invited to participate in an online survey with 50 questions. Differences between neonatologists and NICU nurses and between language regions were explored. Results: Ninety six of 121 (79%) physicians and 302 of 431(70%) nurses completed the online questionnaire. The following difficulties with end-of-life decision-making were reported more frequently by nurses than physicians: insufficient time for decision-making, legal constraints and lack of consistent unit policies. Nurses also mentioned a lack of solidarity in our society and shortage of services for disabled more often than physicians. In the context of limiting intensive care in selected circumstances, nurses considered withholding tube feedings and respiratory support less acceptable than physicians. Nurses were more reluctant to give parents full authority to decide on the course of action for their infant. In contrast to professional category (nurse or physician), language region, professional experience and religion had little influence if any on the answers given. Conclusions: Physicians and nurses differ in many aspects of how and by whom end-of-life decisions should be made in extremely preterm infants. The divergencies between nurses and physicians may be due to differences in ethics education, varying focus in patient care and direct exposure to the patients. Acknowledging these differences is important to avoid potential conflicts within the neonatal team but also with parents in the process of end-of-life decision-making in preterm infants born at the limits of viability.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Perceptions of physicians, medical and nursing students concerning shared decision-making: a cross-sectional study
    Cantaert, Gabriel Rafael
    Van Hecke, Ann
    Smolderen, Kim
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2021, 76 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [22] Patient Involvement in Shared Decision-Making: Do Patients Rate Physicians and Nurses Differently?
    Galletta, Maura
    Piazza, Maria Francesca
    Meloni, Stefania Luisa
    Chessa, Elsa
    Piras, Ilenia
    Arnetz, Judith E.
    D'Aloja, Ernesto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)
  • [23] Physicians Disclosing Religion in Online Biographies: Patient Perceptions and Decision-Making in the United States
    Perrault, Evan K.
    McPhail, Brian L.
    JOURNAL OF RELIGION & HEALTH, 2023, 62 (04) : 2452 - 2473
  • [24] Depressed patients' perceptions of depression treatment decision-making
    Simon, Daniela
    Loh, Andreas
    Wills, Celia E.
    Haerter, Martin
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2007, 10 (01) : 62 - 74
  • [25] Physicians' perceptions of shared decision-making behaviours: a qualitative study demonstrating the continued chasm between aspirations and clinical practice
    Zeuner, Rachel
    Frosch, Dominick L.
    Kuzemchak, Marie D.
    Politi, Mary C.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (06) : 2465 - 2476
  • [26] Shared decision-making in the ICU from the perspective of physicians, nurses and patients: a qualitative interview study
    Wubben, Nina
    van den Boogaard, Mark
    van der Hoeven, J. G.
    Zegers, Marieke
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [27] End-of-Life Decision-Making in Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Croatia-A Focus Group Study among Nurses and Physicians
    Rubic, Filip
    Curkovic, Marko
    Brajkovic, Lovorka
    Nevajdic, Bojana
    Novak, Milivoj
    Filipovic-Grcic, Boris
    Mestrovic, Julije
    Lah Tomulic, Kristina
    Peter, Branimir
    Borovecki, Ana
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (02):
  • [28] An integrated ethical decision-making model for nurses
    Park, Eun-Jun
    NURSING ETHICS, 2012, 19 (01) : 139 - 159
  • [29] Physicians' perceptions of shared decision-making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Results of a physician survey
    Ali-Ahmed, Fatima
    Matlock, Daniel
    Zeitler, Emily P.
    Thomas, Kevin L.
    Haines, David E.
    Al-Khatib, Sana M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 30 (11) : 2420 - 2426
  • [30] Decision-making at the borderline of viability: Who should decide and on what basis?
    Gillam, Lynn
    Wilkinson, Dominic
    Xafis, Vicki
    Isaacs, David
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2017, 53 (02) : 105 - 111