Decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses

被引:43
|
作者
Bucher, Hans Ulrich [1 ]
Klein, Sabine D. [1 ]
Hendriks, Manya J. [1 ,2 ]
Baumann-Hoelzle, Ruth [3 ]
Berger, Thomas M. [4 ]
Streuli, Jurg C. [2 ]
Fauchere, Jean-Claude [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Neonatol, Frauenklin Str 10, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Inst Biomed Eth & Hist Med, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Dialogue Eth Fdn, Interdisciplinary Inst Eth Hlth Care, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Childrens Hosp Lucerne, Neonatal & Paediat Intens Care Unit, Luzern, Switzerland
来源
BMC PEDIATRICS | 2018年 / 18卷
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Extremely preterm infants; Neonatal intensive care; End-of-life decisions; Shared decision-making; Health care professionals; Previable period; OF-LIFE DECISIONS; EXTREMELY PRETERM INFANTS; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE; PARENTS; ATTITUDES; RESUSCITATION; NATIONWIDE; GUIDELINE; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1186/s12887-018-1040-z
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: In the last 20 years, the chances for intact survival for extremely preterm infants have increased in high income countries. Decisions about withholding or withdrawing intensive care remain a major challenge in infants born at the limits of viability. Shared decision-making regarding these fragile infants between health care professionals and parents has become the preferred model today. However, there is an ongoing ethical debate on how decisions regarding life-sustaining treatment should be reached and who should have the final word when health care professionals and parents do not agree. We designed a survey among neonatologists and neonatal nurses to analyze practices, difficulties and parental involvement in end-of-life decisions for extremely preterm infants. Methods: All 552 physicians and nurses with at least 12 months work experience in level III neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Switzerland were invited to participate in an online survey with 50 questions. Differences between neonatologists and NICU nurses and between language regions were explored. Results: Ninety six of 121 (79%) physicians and 302 of 431(70%) nurses completed the online questionnaire. The following difficulties with end-of-life decision-making were reported more frequently by nurses than physicians: insufficient time for decision-making, legal constraints and lack of consistent unit policies. Nurses also mentioned a lack of solidarity in our society and shortage of services for disabled more often than physicians. In the context of limiting intensive care in selected circumstances, nurses considered withholding tube feedings and respiratory support less acceptable than physicians. Nurses were more reluctant to give parents full authority to decide on the course of action for their infant. In contrast to professional category (nurse or physician), language region, professional experience and religion had little influence if any on the answers given. Conclusions: Physicians and nurses differ in many aspects of how and by whom end-of-life decisions should be made in extremely preterm infants. The divergencies between nurses and physicians may be due to differences in ethics education, varying focus in patient care and direct exposure to the patients. Acknowledging these differences is important to avoid potential conflicts within the neonatal team but also with parents in the process of end-of-life decision-making in preterm infants born at the limits of viability.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THERAPEUTIC DECISION-MAKING OF PHYSICIANS
    DENIG, P
    HAAIJER-RUSKAMP, FM
    PHARMACEUTISCH WEEKBLAD-SCIENTIFIC EDITION, 1992, 14 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [22] Attitudinal patterns determining decision-making in the treatment of the elderly: a comparison between physicians and nurses in Germany and Sweden
    J. Richter
    M.R. Eisemann
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2000, 26 : 1326 - 1333
  • [23] Cognitive Decision-making and Public Opinions
    Mo, Wang
    NEUROQUANTOLOGY, 2018, 16 (05) : 553 - 560
  • [24] Nurses' clinical decision-making
    Currey, Judy
    WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2007, 4 (04) : 226 - 226
  • [25] Physicians’ and nurses’ experiences of end-of-life decision-making in geriatric settings
    Valter Giantin
    Paola Siviero
    Matteo Simonato
    Mario Iasevoli
    Valentina Pengo
    Margherita Andrigo
    Matteo Storti
    Elisabetta Valentini
    Renzo Pegoraro
    Stefania Maggi
    Gaetano Crepaldi
    Enzo Manzato
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2012, 24 : 537 - 547
  • [26] Physicians' and nurses' experiences of end-of-life decision-making in geriatric settings
    Giantin, Valter
    Siviero, Paola
    Simonato, Matteo
    Iasevoli, Mario
    Pengo, Valentina
    Andrigo, Margherita
    Storti, Matteo
    Valentini, Elisabetta
    Pegoraro, Renzo
    Maggi, Stefania
    Crepaldi, Gaetano
    Manzato, Enzo
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2012, 24 (05) : 537 - 547
  • [27] Decision-making in cardiac arrest: physicians' and nurses' knowledge and views on terminating resuscitation
    Hansen, Camilla
    Lauridsen, Kasper G.
    Schmidt, Anders S.
    Lofgren, Bo
    OPEN ACCESS EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 11 : 1 - 8
  • [28] Physicians’ and nurses’ experiences of end-of-life decision-making in geriatric settings
    Valter Giantin
    Paola Siviero
    Matteo Simonato
    Mario Iasevoli
    Valentina Pengo
    Margherita Andrigo
    Matteo Storti
    Elisabetta Valentini
    Renzo Pegoraro
    Stefania Maggi
    Gaetano Crepaldi
    Enzo Manzato
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2012, 24 (5) : 537 - 547
  • [29] The Relationship Between the Emotional Intelligence and Clinical Decision-Making Among Nurses in Neonatal Intensive Care Units
    Ayed, Ahmad
    SAGE OPEN NURSING, 2025, 11
  • [30] EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS' PERCEPTIONS AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES REGARDING PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH PALPITATIONS
    Probst, Marc A.
    Kanzaria, Hemal K.
    Hoffman, Jerome R.
    Mower, William R.
    Moheimani, Roya S.
    Sun, Benjamin C.
    Quigley, Denise D.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 49 (02): : 236 - +