Decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses

被引:42
|
作者
Bucher, Hans Ulrich [1 ]
Klein, Sabine D. [1 ]
Hendriks, Manya J. [1 ,2 ]
Baumann-Hoelzle, Ruth [3 ]
Berger, Thomas M. [4 ]
Streuli, Jurg C. [2 ]
Fauchere, Jean-Claude [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Neonatol, Frauenklin Str 10, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Inst Biomed Eth & Hist Med, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Dialogue Eth Fdn, Interdisciplinary Inst Eth Hlth Care, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Childrens Hosp Lucerne, Neonatal & Paediat Intens Care Unit, Luzern, Switzerland
来源
BMC PEDIATRICS | 2018年 / 18卷
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Extremely preterm infants; Neonatal intensive care; End-of-life decisions; Shared decision-making; Health care professionals; Previable period; OF-LIFE DECISIONS; EXTREMELY PRETERM INFANTS; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE; PARENTS; ATTITUDES; RESUSCITATION; NATIONWIDE; GUIDELINE; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1186/s12887-018-1040-z
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: In the last 20 years, the chances for intact survival for extremely preterm infants have increased in high income countries. Decisions about withholding or withdrawing intensive care remain a major challenge in infants born at the limits of viability. Shared decision-making regarding these fragile infants between health care professionals and parents has become the preferred model today. However, there is an ongoing ethical debate on how decisions regarding life-sustaining treatment should be reached and who should have the final word when health care professionals and parents do not agree. We designed a survey among neonatologists and neonatal nurses to analyze practices, difficulties and parental involvement in end-of-life decisions for extremely preterm infants. Methods: All 552 physicians and nurses with at least 12 months work experience in level III neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Switzerland were invited to participate in an online survey with 50 questions. Differences between neonatologists and NICU nurses and between language regions were explored. Results: Ninety six of 121 (79%) physicians and 302 of 431(70%) nurses completed the online questionnaire. The following difficulties with end-of-life decision-making were reported more frequently by nurses than physicians: insufficient time for decision-making, legal constraints and lack of consistent unit policies. Nurses also mentioned a lack of solidarity in our society and shortage of services for disabled more often than physicians. In the context of limiting intensive care in selected circumstances, nurses considered withholding tube feedings and respiratory support less acceptable than physicians. Nurses were more reluctant to give parents full authority to decide on the course of action for their infant. In contrast to professional category (nurse or physician), language region, professional experience and religion had little influence if any on the answers given. Conclusions: Physicians and nurses differ in many aspects of how and by whom end-of-life decisions should be made in extremely preterm infants. The divergencies between nurses and physicians may be due to differences in ethics education, varying focus in patient care and direct exposure to the patients. Acknowledging these differences is important to avoid potential conflicts within the neonatal team but also with parents in the process of end-of-life decision-making in preterm infants born at the limits of viability.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses
    Hans Ulrich Bucher
    Sabine D. Klein
    Manya J. Hendriks
    Ruth Baumann-Hölzle
    Thomas M. Berger
    Jürg C. Streuli
    Jean-Claude Fauchère
    BMC Pediatrics, 18
  • [2] Decision-making at the limit of viability
    Lemos, Ana
    Soares, Henrique
    Guimaraes, Hercilia
    MINERVA PEDIATRICS, 2021, 73 (04): : 348 - 362
  • [3] Decision-making at the limit of viability: the Austrian neonatal choice context
    Stanak, Michal
    Hawlik, Katharina
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [4] Physicians Perceptions of Shared Decision-Making in Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care
    Richards, Claire A.
    Starks, Helene
    O'Connor, M. Rebecca
    Bourget, Erica
    Hays, Ross M.
    Doorenbos, Ardith Z.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 35 (04) : 669 - 676
  • [5] Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making: The Possible Behavior of Greek Physicians, Midwives, and Nurses in Clinical Scenarios
    Dagla, Maria
    Petousi, Vasiliki
    Poulios, Antonios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (08)
  • [6] Shared decision-making, quality of life, and the child's best interest: ethical challenges in decision-making in preterm infants at the limit of viability
    Carvalho, Diana
    Primc, Nadia
    ETHIK IN DER MEDIZIN, 2023, 35 (04) : 487 - 506
  • [7] Perceptions of Ethical Decision-Making Climate Among Clinicians Working in European and US ICUs: Differences Between Nurses and Physicians*
    Jensen, Hanne Irene
    Hebsgaard, Stine
    Hansen, Tina Charlotte Bitsch
    Johnsen, Rikke Frank Aagaard
    Hartog, Christiane S.
    Soultati, Ioanna
    Szucs, Orsolya
    Wilson, Michael E.
    van den Bulcke, Bo
    Benoit, Dominique D.
    Piers, Ruth
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (12) : 1716 - 1723
  • [8] Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in neonatal medicine: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of parental perceptions
    Parish, Olivia
    Williams, Denitza
    Odd, David
    Joseph-Williams, Natalie
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (05) : 1101 - 1114
  • [9] A qualitative study of factors in nurses' and physicians' decision-making related to family presence during resuscitation
    Twibell, Renee
    Siela, Debra
    Riwitis, Cheryl
    Neal, Alexis
    Waters, Nicole
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (1-2) : E320 - E334
  • [10] Decision-making in cardiac arrest: physicians' and nurses' knowledge and views on terminating resuscitation
    Hansen, Camilla
    Lauridsen, Kasper G.
    Schmidt, Anders S.
    Lofgren, Bo
    OPEN ACCESS EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 11 : 1 - 8