Commentary to the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 17 December 2020, Centraal Israelitisch Consistorie van Belgie and Others, Case C-336/19

被引:0
作者
Jaroszynski, Tomasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Polska Warsaw Univ Technol, Politech Warszawska, Wydzial Administracji & Nauk Spolecznych, Fac Adm & Social Sci, Warsaw, Poland
来源
PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY | 2022年 / 04期
关键词
animal welfare; ritual slaughter; freedom of religion; the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU;
D O I
10.31268/PS.2022.131
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
A decree of the Flemish Region provided for the use of reversible stunning as regards ritual slaughter. The decree was challenged by several Jewish and Muslim associations, claiming that it breached the Council Regulation No 1099/2009. In this framework, the Belgian court made a reference to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling regarding the interpretation of this regulation. In the commented case the CJEU sought a balance between the protection of animal welfare, as set out in Article 13 TFEU and freedom of religion, as guaranteed by Article 10 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. It ruled that Regulation No 1099/2009 does not preclude legis-lation of a Member State which requires, in the context of ritual slaughter, a reversible stunning procedure. The commentary discusses doubts about the motives of the CJEU's ruling, in particu-lar relating to unjustified prioritisation of animal welfare over freedom of religion, and concludes that the decree violates the right to freedom of religion protected by the Charter.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 202
页数:14
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WYROK TSUE DNIA 23 K
[2]  
[Anonymous], WYROK TSUE DNIA 29 M
[3]  
[Anonymous], WYROK TSUE DNIA 21 M
[4]  
[Anonymous], OPINIA RZECZNIKA GEN
[5]  
[Anonymous], WYROK TSUE DNIA 10 W
[6]  
[Anonymous], WYROK TSUE DNIA 26 L
[7]  
[Anonymous], WYROK ETPC DNIA 7 LI
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ROZPORZADZENIE RADY
[9]  
[Anonymous], WYROK TSUE DNIA 17 G
[10]  
[Anonymous], OPINIA RZECZNIKA GEN