Reconsidering Virtue: Differences of Perspective in Virtue Ethics and the Positive Social Sciences

被引:94
|
作者
Bright, David S. [1 ]
Winn, Bradley A. [2 ]
Kanov, Jason [3 ]
机构
[1] Wright State Univ, Raj Soin Coll Business, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Jon M Huntsman Sch Business, Mt Green, UT 84050 USA
[3] Western Washington Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Bellingham, WA 98225 USA
关键词
Positive organizational ethics; Positive psychology; Positive organizational scholarship; Organizational virtuousness; Positive social science; Virtue; Virtues; Virtue ethics; Organizational virtue; Virtue theory; DARK SIDE; VIRTUOUSNESS; PERSONALITY; FORGIVENESS; PSYCHOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; COMPASSION; CHARACTER; BUSINESS; GOODS;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-013-1832-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper describes differences in two perspectives on the idea of virtue as a theoretical foundation for positive organizational ethics (POE). The virtue ethics perspective is grounded in the philosophical tradition, has classical roots, and focuses attention on virtue as a property of character. The positive social science perspective is a recent movement (e.g., positive psychology and positive organizational scholarship) that has implications for POE. The positive social science movement operationalizes virtue through an empirical lens that emphasizes virtuous behaviors. From a virtue ethics perspective, a behaviorally based account of virtue is a weak theory of virtue. Observations are suggested for integrating the two perspectives. First, virtue should always be understood as an excellence and is often an optimal point between extreme dysfunctions on continuum of potential states. Second, an empirical exploration of virtue needs to account for character and context. Finally, the properties of organization-level virtue need to be further specified and explored. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 460
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE VIRTUE ETHICS
    Vaccarezza, Maria Silvia
    ACTA PHILOSOPHICA, 2015, 24 (02): : 399 - 412
  • [42] On virtue ethics
    Driver, J
    PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 2002, 111 (01): : 122 - 127
  • [43] Virtue Ethics
    Duffy, John
    Gallagher, John
    Holmes, Steve
    RHETORIC REVIEW, 2018, 37 (04) : 321 - 327
  • [44] Virtue ethics
    Vernon, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2003, 53 (486): : 60 - 61
  • [45] On virtue ethics
    Harrison-Carter, V
    HEYTHROP JOURNAL-A QUARTERLY REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY, 2003, 44 (03): : 392 - 393
  • [46] Virtue Ethics
    Zagzebski, Linda
    THINK-PHILOSOPHY FOR EVERYONE, 2023, 22 (63): : 15 - 21
  • [47] On virtue ethics
    Harman, G
    TLS-THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, 2001, (5104): : 26 - 26
  • [48] On virtue ethics
    Centore, FF
    REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS, 2002, 56 (01): : 178 - 179
  • [49] On virtue ethics
    Athanassoulis, N
    RATIO-NEW SERIES, 2001, 14 (01): : 86 - 90
  • [50] On Virtue Ethics
    Slote, Michael
    FRONTIERS OF PHILOSOPHY IN CHINA, 2013, 8 (01) : 22 - 30