Reconsidering Virtue: Differences of Perspective in Virtue Ethics and the Positive Social Sciences

被引:96
作者
Bright, David S. [1 ]
Winn, Bradley A. [2 ]
Kanov, Jason [3 ]
机构
[1] Wright State Univ, Raj Soin Coll Business, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Jon M Huntsman Sch Business, Mt Green, UT 84050 USA
[3] Western Washington Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Bellingham, WA 98225 USA
关键词
Positive organizational ethics; Positive psychology; Positive organizational scholarship; Organizational virtuousness; Positive social science; Virtue; Virtues; Virtue ethics; Organizational virtue; Virtue theory; DARK SIDE; VIRTUOUSNESS; PERSONALITY; FORGIVENESS; PSYCHOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; COMPASSION; CHARACTER; BUSINESS; GOODS;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-013-1832-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper describes differences in two perspectives on the idea of virtue as a theoretical foundation for positive organizational ethics (POE). The virtue ethics perspective is grounded in the philosophical tradition, has classical roots, and focuses attention on virtue as a property of character. The positive social science perspective is a recent movement (e.g., positive psychology and positive organizational scholarship) that has implications for POE. The positive social science movement operationalizes virtue through an empirical lens that emphasizes virtuous behaviors. From a virtue ethics perspective, a behaviorally based account of virtue is a weak theory of virtue. Observations are suggested for integrating the two perspectives. First, virtue should always be understood as an excellence and is often an optimal point between extreme dysfunctions on continuum of potential states. Second, an empirical exploration of virtue needs to account for character and context. Finally, the properties of organization-level virtue need to be further specified and explored. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 460
页数:16
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Character and environment: The status of virtues in organizations [J].
Alzola, Miguel .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2008, 78 (03) :343-357
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, NEW
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, VIRTUES MIND INQUIRY, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174763
[4]  
Aquinas Thomas., 1984, TREATISE VIRTUES
[5]   Virtue theory as a dynamic theory of business [J].
Arjoon, S .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2000, 28 (02) :159-178
[6]   Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle [J].
Baumeister, RF ;
Exline, JJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1999, 67 (06) :1165-1194
[7]  
Bosk CL., 1979, Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure, DOI 10.7208/chicago/9780226924687.001.0001
[8]  
Bright D. S., 2010, PRACTICING ORG DEV G, P395
[9]  
Bright D.S., 2012, The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship, P244
[10]   Forgiveness from the Perspectives of Three Response Modes: Begrudgement, Pragmatism, and Transcendence [J].
Bright, David S. ;
Fry, Ronald E. ;
Cooperrider, David L. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SPIRITUALITY & RELIGION, 2006, 3 (1-2) :78-103