A commitment to change: Revision of HCFA's RAI

被引:188
作者
Morris, JN
Nonemaker, S
Murphy, K
Hawes, C
Fries, BE
Mor, V
Phillips, C
机构
[1] US HLTH CARE FINANCING ADM,NURSING HOME BRANCH,BALTIMORE,MD 21207
[2] RES TRIANGLE INST,RES TRIANGLE PK,NC 27709
[3] UNIV MICHIGAN,INST GERONTOL,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
[4] UNIV MICHIGAN,SCH PUBL HLTH,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
[5] VET ADM MED CTR,ANN ARBOR,MI
[6] BROWN UNIV,CTR GERONTOL & HLTH CARE RES,PROVIDENCE,RI 02912
[7] MENORAH PK CTR AGING,MYERS RES INST,BEACHWOOD,OH
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02974.x
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To describe the reliability of new assessment items and their clinical utility as judged by experienced nurse assessors, based on the results from the field test of Version 2.0 of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI). DESIGN: Independent dual assessment of residents of nursing facilities by staff nurses using a draft of Version 2.0 of the minimum data set (MDS). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 187 randomly selected residents from 21 nursing homes in seven states volunteered to test Version 2.0 of the MDS. MEASUREMENT: The full array of MDS assessment items included measures in the following areas: Background information, cognitive patterns, communication/hearing, vision, mood and behavior, psychosocial well-being, physical functioning and structural problems, continence, disease diagnoses, health condition, oral/nutritional status, dental status, skin condition, activity pursuit patterns, medications, special treatments and procedures, and discharge potential and overall status. RESULTS: Evaluative data address issues of MDS item utility and reliability. For new items, almost all achieved a reasonably high-weighted Kappa interrater reliability; revised items also surpassed earlier items, and with the updated training materials, even the non-changed items had higher average reliability levels. Based on the success of the field test and the positive response of the industry, Version 2.0 of the RAI has been adopted, and HCFA has initiated a more long-range process to update further the RAI when necessary. CONCLUSION: Findings support the reliability and clinical utility of the new and revised assessment items incorporated by HCFA in Version 2.0 of the MDS.
引用
收藏
页码:1011 / 1016
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1991, Resident assessment instrument training manual and resource guide
  • [2] Brandeis G H, 1995, Adv Wound Care, V8, P18
  • [3] The prevalence of potentially remediable urinary incontinence in frail older people: A study using the minimum data set
    Brandeis, GH
    Baumann, MM
    Hossain, M
    Morris, JN
    Resnick, NM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1997, 45 (02) : 179 - 184
  • [4] Fleiss JL., 1981, MEASUREMENT INTERRAT
  • [5] RELIABILITY ESTIMATES FOR THE MINIMUM DATA SET FOR NURSING-HOME RESIDENT ASSESSMENT AND CARE SCREENING (MDS)
    HAWES, C
    MORRIS, JN
    PHILLIPS, CD
    MOR, V
    FRIES, BE
    NONEMAKER, S
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 1995, 35 (02) : 172 - 178
  • [6] The OBRA-87 nursing home regulations and implementation of the resident assessment instrument: Effects on process quality
    Hawes, C
    Mor, V
    Phillips, CD
    Fries, BE
    Morris, JN
    SteeleFriedlob, E
    Greene, AM
    Nennstiel, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1997, 45 (08) : 977 - 985
  • [7] THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT AMONG NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS
    MOR, V
    BRANCO, K
    FLEISHMAN, J
    HAWES, C
    PHILLIPS, C
    MORRIS, J
    FRIES, B
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1995, 50 (01): : P1 - P8
  • [8] DESIGNING THE NATIONAL RESIDENT ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT FOR NURSING-HOMES
    MORRIS, JN
    HAWES, C
    FRIES, BE
    PHILLIPS, CD
    MOR, V
    KATZ, S
    MURPHY, K
    DRUGOVICH, ML
    FRIEDLOB, AS
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 1990, 30 (03) : 293 - 307
  • [9] MDS COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE SCALE(C)
    MORRIS, JN
    FRIES, BE
    MEHR, DR
    HAWES, C
    PHILLIPS, C
    MOR, V
    LIPSITZ, LA
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1994, 49 (04): : M174 - M182
  • [10] MORRIS JN, 1995, LONG TERM CARE RESID