An ambulatory blood pressure monitoring study of the comparative anti hypertensive efficacy of two angiotensin II receptor antagonists, irbesartan and valsartan

被引:50
作者
Mancia, G
Korlipara, K
van Rossum, P
Villa, G
Silvert, B
机构
[1] Univ Milano Bicocca, Osped S Gerardo, Dept Med, I-20052 Monza, Italy
[2] Pike View Med Ctr, Bolton, England
[3] Beatrix Ziekenhuis, Gorinchem, Netherlands
[4] Fdn S Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
[5] Stonehill Med Ctr, Bolton, England
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; angiotensin II receptor antagonists; irbesartan; valsartan;
D O I
10.1097/00126097-200204000-00008
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background The primary objective of this study was to compare the change from baseline in mean diastolic ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) at 24 h post dose (trough measurement) after 8 weeks of treatment with irbesartan or valsartan in subjects with mild-to-mode rate hypertension. Secondary objectives included comparing the mean changes from baseline in systolic ABP at trough; 24-h ABP; morning and night-time ABP; self-measured systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP); and office-measured SBP and DBP at trough. Design After a 3-week, single blind, placebo lead-in period, 426 subjects were randomized to receive either irbesartan 150 mg or valsartan 80 mg for 8 weeks. Methods Ambulatory blood pressure measurements were obtained at baseline and at week 8. Self-measured morning and evening DBP and SBP readings were obtained at home over a 7-day period at baseline and at week 8. Office-measured seated DBP and SBP measurements were obtained at trough, at baseline, and at week 8. Results Irbesartan demonstrated significantly greater reductions than valsartan for mean change from baseline in diastolic ABP at trough (-6.73 versus -4.84 mmHg, respectively; P=0.035). Irbesartan produced significantly greater reductions than valsartan for mean systolic ABP at trough (-11.62 versus -7.5 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01) and for mean 24-h diastolic ABP (-6.38 versus -4.82 mmHg, respectively; P=0.023) and systolic ABP (-10.24 versus -7.76 mmHg; P < 0.01). Irbesartan also produced significantly greater reductions than valsartan for office-measured seated DBP (-10.46 versus 7.28 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01) and SBP (-16.23 versus -9.96 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01) and for self-measured morning DBP (-6.28 versus -3.75 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01) and SBP (-10.21 versus -6.97 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01). Both drugs were well tolerated. Conclusion Irbesartan was more effective than valsartan in reducing DBP and SBP at trough and in providing greater overall 24-h blood pressure-lowering efficacy. (C) 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 142
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of olmesartan relative to other angiotensin II receptor antagonists: an overview of randomized controlled studies
    Zannad, Faiez
    Fay, Renaud
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, (04): : 106 - +
  • [32] Methodological considerations in the evaluation of the duration of action of anti hypertensive therapy using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
    Aboy, M
    Fernández, JR
    Hermida, RC
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2005, 10 (03) : 111 - 115
  • [33] Efficacy of isolated home blood pressure monitoring for blood pressure control: randomized controlled trial with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring - MONITOR study
    Fuchs, Sandra C.
    Ferreira-da-Silva, Andre L.
    Moreira, Leila B.
    Neyeloff, Jeruza L.
    Fuchs, Felipe C.
    Gus, Miguel
    Wiehe, Mario
    Fuchs, Flavio D.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2012, 30 (01) : 75 - 80
  • [34] A multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of irbesartan and enalapril in adults with mild to moderate essential hypertension, as assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring:: The MAPAVEL study
    Coca, A
    Calvo, C
    García-Puig, J
    Gil-Extremera, B
    Aguilera, M
    de la Sierra, A
    Martín-Hidalgo, A
    Marín, R
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (01) : 126 - 138
  • [35] Efficacy of losartan, valsartan, and telmisartan in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
    Fogari, R
    Mugellini, A
    Zoppi, A
    Derosa, G
    Rinaldi, A
    Fogari, E
    Vanasia, A
    Preti, P
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2002, 63 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [36] A Randomized Trial of the Effect of an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker SR47436 (Irbesartan) on 24-Hour Blood Pressure in Patients with Essential Hypertension
    Yuhei Kawano
    Yoichi Sato
    Kaoru Yoshinaga
    Hypertension Research, 2008, 31 : 1753 - 1763
  • [37] A Randomized Trial of the Effect of an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker SR47436 (Irbesartan) on 24-Hour Blood Pressure in Patients with Essential Hypertension
    Kawano, Yuhei
    Sato, Yoichi
    Yoshinaga, Kaoru
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2008, 31 (09) : 1753 - 1763
  • [38] Effects of the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Azilsartan Medoxomil Versus Olmesartan and Valsartan on Ambulatory and Clinic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stages 1 and 2 Hypertension
    White, William B.
    Weber, Michael A.
    Sica, Domenic
    Bakris, George L.
    Perez, Alfonso
    Cao, Charlie
    Kupfer, Stuart
    HYPERTENSION, 2011, 57 (03) : 413 - U150
  • [39] A double-blind, crossover study of the antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin II-receptor antagonists and their activation of the renin-angiotensin system
    Fogari, R
    Mugellini, A
    Zoppi, A
    Fogari, E
    Marasi, G
    Pesce, RM
    Banderali, A
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2000, 61 (10): : 669 - 679
  • [40] Antihypertensive Efficacy of AmlodipineResults of a Multicentre Study Based on 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
    A. C. Pessina
    Massimo Gallucci
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 1997, 13 : 143 - 148