An ambulatory blood pressure monitoring study of the comparative anti hypertensive efficacy of two angiotensin II receptor antagonists, irbesartan and valsartan

被引:50
作者
Mancia, G
Korlipara, K
van Rossum, P
Villa, G
Silvert, B
机构
[1] Univ Milano Bicocca, Osped S Gerardo, Dept Med, I-20052 Monza, Italy
[2] Pike View Med Ctr, Bolton, England
[3] Beatrix Ziekenhuis, Gorinchem, Netherlands
[4] Fdn S Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
[5] Stonehill Med Ctr, Bolton, England
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; angiotensin II receptor antagonists; irbesartan; valsartan;
D O I
10.1097/00126097-200204000-00008
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background The primary objective of this study was to compare the change from baseline in mean diastolic ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) at 24 h post dose (trough measurement) after 8 weeks of treatment with irbesartan or valsartan in subjects with mild-to-mode rate hypertension. Secondary objectives included comparing the mean changes from baseline in systolic ABP at trough; 24-h ABP; morning and night-time ABP; self-measured systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP); and office-measured SBP and DBP at trough. Design After a 3-week, single blind, placebo lead-in period, 426 subjects were randomized to receive either irbesartan 150 mg or valsartan 80 mg for 8 weeks. Methods Ambulatory blood pressure measurements were obtained at baseline and at week 8. Self-measured morning and evening DBP and SBP readings were obtained at home over a 7-day period at baseline and at week 8. Office-measured seated DBP and SBP measurements were obtained at trough, at baseline, and at week 8. Results Irbesartan demonstrated significantly greater reductions than valsartan for mean change from baseline in diastolic ABP at trough (-6.73 versus -4.84 mmHg, respectively; P=0.035). Irbesartan produced significantly greater reductions than valsartan for mean systolic ABP at trough (-11.62 versus -7.5 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01) and for mean 24-h diastolic ABP (-6.38 versus -4.82 mmHg, respectively; P=0.023) and systolic ABP (-10.24 versus -7.76 mmHg; P < 0.01). Irbesartan also produced significantly greater reductions than valsartan for office-measured seated DBP (-10.46 versus 7.28 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01) and SBP (-16.23 versus -9.96 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01) and for self-measured morning DBP (-6.28 versus -3.75 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01) and SBP (-10.21 versus -6.97 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01). Both drugs were well tolerated. Conclusion Irbesartan was more effective than valsartan in reducing DBP and SBP at trough and in providing greater overall 24-h blood pressure-lowering efficacy. (C) 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 142
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring compared with clinic and home blood pressure measures in evaluating moderate versus intensive treatment of hypertension with amlodipine/valsartan for patients uncontrolled on angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy
    Giles, Thomas D.
    Oparil, Suzanne
    Ofili, Elizabeth O.
    Pitt, Bertram
    Purkayastha, Das
    Hilkert, Robert
    Samuel, Rita
    Sowers, James R.
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2011, 16 (02) : 87 - 95
  • [22] Ambulatory blood pressure comparison of the anti-hypertensive efficacy of fixed combinations of irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide and losartan/hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension
    Neutel, JM
    Smith, D
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 33 (06) : 620 - 631
  • [23] A comparison of home measurement and ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure in the adjustment of anti hypertensive treatment
    Niiranen, TJ
    Kantola, IM
    Vesalainen, R
    Johansson, J
    Ruuska, MJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2006, 19 (05) : 468 - 474
  • [24] Effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker on ambulatory blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients with overt diabetic nephropathy
    Shin-ichiro Masuda
    Kouichi Tamura
    Hiromichi Wakui
    Tomohiko Kanaoka
    Masato Ohsawa
    Akinobu Maeda
    Toru Dejima
    Mai Yanagi
    Koichi Azuma
    Satoshi Umemura
    Hypertension Research, 2009, 32 : 950 - 955
  • [25] Effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker on ambulatory blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients with overt diabetic nephropathy
    Masuda, Shin-ichiro
    Tamura, Kouichi
    Wakui, Hiromichi
    Kanaoka, Tomohiko
    Ohsawa, Masato
    Maeda, Akinobu
    Dejima, Toru
    Yanagi, Mai
    Azuma, Koichi
    Umemura, Satoshi
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2009, 32 (11) : 950 - 955
  • [26] Use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to evaluate the selective angiotensin II receptor antagonist, telmisartan, and other antihypertensive drugs
    Neutel, JM
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2000, 5 : S35 - S40
  • [27] Chronotherapy of Hypertension with Angiotensin Receptor Blockers-A Meta-Analysis of Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Randomized Trials
    Zhao, Di
    Liu, Hui
    Dong, Pingshuan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 361 (01) : 36 - 42
  • [28] Endothelial functional activity and circadian blood pressure dynamics in hypertensive patients treated with angiotensin receptor antagonists
    Poteshkina, N. G.
    Selivanova, G. B.
    Zhalsaraev, T. Zh.
    CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY AND PREVENTION, 2011, 10 (05): : 20 - 25
  • [29] Effects of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on the Relationships Between Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Anti-Hypertensive Effects, Autonomic Function, and Health-Related Quality of Life
    Okano, Yasuko
    Tamura, Kouichi
    Masuda, Shinitirou
    Ozawa, Motoko
    Tochikubo, Osamu
    Umemura, Satoshi
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 2009, 31 (08) : 680 - 689
  • [30] A large-scale ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) trial in the practice setting: Efficacy of the angiotensin receptor blocker, telmisartan
    White, WB
    Bakris, GL
    Giles, TD
    Davidai, G
    Weber, MA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 17 (05) : 59A - 59A